De Haas-van Alphen oscillations in the charge density wave compound lanthanum tritelluride LaTe3

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 2008, Pages

  Ru, N ^a   Borzi, R A ^b,d   Rost, A ^b   Mackenzie, A P ^b   Laverock, J ^c   Dugdale, S B ^c   Fisher, I R ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE LA PLATA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 49149100125     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.045123     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. E. DiMasi, M. C. Aronson, J. F. Mansfield, B. Foran, and S. Lee, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.14516 52, 14516 (1995).
2. C. D. Malliakas and M. G. Kanatzidis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. JACSAT 0002-7863 10.1021/ja0641608 128, 12612 (2006).
3. N. Ru, C. L. Condron, G. Y. Margulis, K. Y. Shin, J. Laverock, S. B. Dugdale, M. F. Toney, and I. R. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.035114 77, 035114 (2008).
4. V. Brouet, W. L. Yang, X. J. Zhou, Z. Hussain, R. G. Moore, R. He, D. H. Lu, Z. X. Shen, J. Laverock, S. B. Dugdale, N. Ru, and I. R. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.235104 77, 235104 (2008).
5. B. K. Norling and H. Steinfink, Inorg. Chem. INOCAJ 0020-1669 10.1021/ic50043a004 5, 1488 (1966).
6. J. Laverock, S. B. Dugdale, Z. Major, M. A. Alam, N. Ru, I. R. Fisher, G. Santi, and E. Bruno, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.085114 71, 085114 (2005).
7. H. Yao, J. A. Robertson, E. A. Kim, and S. A. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.245126 74, 245126 (2006).
8. M. D. Johannes and I. I. Mazin, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.165135 77, 165135 (2008).
9. V. Brouet, W. L. Yang, X. J. Zhou, Z. Hussain, N. Ru, K. Y. Shin, I. R. Fisher, and Z. X. Shen, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 93.126405 93, 126405 (2004).
10. Y. Iyeiri, T. Okumura, C. Michioka, and K. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.144417 67, 144417 (2003).
11. H. J. Kim, C. D. Malliakas, A. T. Tomić, S. H. Tessmer, M. G. Kanatzidis, and S. J. L. Billinge, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.226401 96, 226401 (2006).
12. A. Fang, N. Ru, I. R. Fisher, and A. Kapitulnik, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.046401 99, 046401 (2007).
13. G.-H. Gweon, J. D. Denlinger, J. A. Clack, J. W. Allen, C. G. Olson, E. DiMasi, M. C. Aronson, B. Foran, and S. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.886 81, 886 (1998).
14. H. Komoda, T. Sato, S. Souma, T. Takahashi, Y. Ito, and K. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.195101 70, 195101 (2004).
15. N. Ru and I. R. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.033101 73, 033101 (2006).
16. C. L. Condron, J. H. Chu, I. R. Fisher, and M. F. Toney (unpublished).
17. R. G. Moore, V. Brouet, R. He, D. H. Lu, N. Ru, J.-H. Chu, I. R. Fisher, and Z.-X. Shen (unpublished).
18. D. Shoenberg, Magnetic Oscillations in Metals (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1984).
19. B. Barbiellini, S. B. Dugdale, and T. Jarlborg, Comput. Mater. Sci. CMMSEM 0927-0256 10.1016/S0927-0256(03)00114-9 28, 287 (2003).
20. Note that an alternative maximal area of 3.97% might be expected from a slightly different connectivity of these Fermi surface sheets.
21. C. Bergemann, A. Mackenzie, S. Julian, D. Forsythe, and E. Ohmichi, Adv. Phys. ADPHAH 0001-8732 10.1080/00018730310001621737 52, 639 (2003).
22. K. Yamaji, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. JUPSAU 0031-9015 10.1143/JPSJ.58.1520 58, 1520 (1989).
23. A. Sacchetti, L. Degiorgi, T. Giamarchi, N. Ru, and I. R. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.125115 74, 125115 (2006).
24. Throughout the paper we have ignored the incommensurate nature of the gapping in discussing the dHvA oscillations. This incommensurability may be related to the presence of the extra frequencies marked with arrows in Fig. 2, but should not alter the basic conclusion that the FS volume in the CDW state is larger than that inferred from the optical conductivity.