Fermi surface reconstruction in the CDW state of CeTe3 observed by photoemission

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 93, Issue 12, 2004, Pages

  Brouet, V ^a,b,c   Yang, W L ^a,b   Zhou, X J ^b   Hussain, Z ^a   Ru, N ^d   Shin, K Y ^d   Fisher, I R ^d   Shen, Z X ^b,d  

^a LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b SLAC NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHARGE CARRIERS; COOLING; ELECTRIC CHARGE; ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE; FERMI SURFACE; MAGNETISM; PHOTOEMISSION; SURFACE TREATMENT;

CHARGE DENSITY WAVES (CDW); ELECTRONIC INSTABILITES; FERMI SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION; SPIN DENSITY WAVES;

CERIUM COMPOUNDS;

EID: 19644384489     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.126405     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. J. Voit et al., Science 290, 501 (2000).
2. See, for example, in 2D transition-metal chalgogenides, Th. Pillo et al., Phys. Rev. B 64, 245105 (2001), or Th. Straub et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4504 (1999).
3. See, for example, in 2D transition-metal chalgogenides, Th. Pillo et al., Phys. Rev. B 64, 245105 (2001), or Th. Straub et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4504 (1999).
4. J. Schafer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 196403 (2001).
5. E. Fawcett, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 209 (1988).
6. N. P. Ong and P. Monceau, Phys. Rev. B 16, 3443 (1977).
7. N. Ru et al., (to be published).
8. X. Yan et al., Phys. Rev. B 36, 1799 (1987); S. Uji et al., Phys. Rev. B 53, 14399 (1996); A. Audouard et al., Phys. Rev. B 50, 12726 (1994).
9. X. Yan et al., Phys. Rev. B 36, 1799 (1987); S. Uji et al., Phys. Rev. B 53, 14399 (1996); A. Audouard et al., Phys. Rev. B 50, 12726 (1994).
10. X. Yan et al., Phys. Rev. B 36, 1799 (1987); S. Uji et al., Phys. Rev. B 53, 14399 (1996); A. Audouard et al., Phys. Rev. B 50, 12726 (1994).
11. B. K. Norling and H. Steinfik, Inorg. Chem. 5, 1488 (1966).
12. A. Kikuchi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67, 1308 (1998).
13. cdw) to make the nesting of the FS more apparent on Fig. 1.
14. G.R Gweon et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 886 (1998).
15. E. DiMasi, B. Foran, M. C. Aronson, and S. Lee, Chem. Mater. 6, 1867 (1994).
16. S. Dugdale et al., (to be published). Calculations predict a parallel bilayer splitting of at most 0.05 π/a.
17. y changes significantly but the folded FS is always significantly weaker.
18. A. Damascelli, Z. Hussain, and Z.-X. Shen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 473 (2003).
19. F. Piéchon, M. Benakli, and A. Jagannathan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 5248 (1995).