Viewpoint-driven simplification using mutual information

Computers and Graphics (Pergamon)

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 451-463

  Castello P ^a   Sbert, M ^b   Chover, M ^a   Feixas, M ^b  

^a Universitat Jaume I   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GIRONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Level of detail; Mutual information; Simplification; Viewpoint selection

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION THEORY;

GEOMETRIC SIMPLIFICATION; INFORMATION THEORETIC MEASURE; LEVEL OF DETAIL; MUTUAL INFORMATIONS; POLYGONAL MESHES; SIMPLIFICATION; VIEWPOINT SELECTION; VISUAL SIMILARITY;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN;

EID: 49149095504     PISSN: 00978493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2008.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Garland M. Multiresolution modeling: survey and future opportunities. State of the Art Reports of EUROGRAPHICS '99, vol. 14 (4), 1999. p. 111-31.
2. Viola I., Feixas M., Sbert M., and Gröller E. Importance-driven focus of attention. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12 5 (2006) 933-940
3. Feixas M, Sbert M, González F. A unified information-theoretic framework for viewpoint selection and mesh saliency. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 2008, to appear.
4. Castelló P, Sbert M, Chover M, Feixas M. Viewpoint entropy-driven simplification. In: Proceedings of the WSCG 2007, Plzen, Czech Republic, p. 249-56.
5. Garland M, Heckbert PS. Simplification using quadric error metrics. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH '97, vol. 31, 1997. p. 209-16.
6. Hoppe H. Progressive meshes. SIGGRAPH '96: proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques, New York, USA, 1996. p. 99-108.
7. Hoppe H. New quadric metric for simplifying meshes with appearance attributes. VIS '99: proceedings of the conference on visualization '99, Alamitos, CA, USA. Silver Spring, MD: IEEE Computer Society Press; 1999. p. 59-66.
8. Garland M, Heckbert PS. Simplifying surfaces with color and texture using quadric error metrics. In: VIS '98: proceedings of the conference on visualization '98, Los Alamitos, CA, USA. Silver Spring, MD: IEEE Computer Society Press; 1998. p. 263-9.
9. Cohen J, Olano M, Manocha D. Appearance preserving simplification. In: Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH '98, vol. 32, 1998. p. 115-22.
10. Lindstrom P., and Turk G. Image-driven simplification. ACM Transactions on Graphics 19 3 (2000) 204-241
11. Luebke D, Hallen B. Perceptually-driven simplification for interactive rendering. In: Proceedings of the 12th eurographics workshop on rendering techniques, London, UK, 2001. p. 223-34.
12. Williams N, Luebke D, Cohen JD, Kelley M, Schubert B. Perceptually guided simplification of lit, textured meshes. In: Proceedings of the 2003 symposium on interactive 3D graphics, New York, NY, USA. New York: ACM Press; 2003. p. 113-21.
13. Zhang E, Turk G. Visibility-guided simplification. In: Proceedings of IEEE visualization 2002, vol. 31, November 2002. p. 267-74.
14. Lee C.H., Varshney A., and Jacobs D.W. Mesh saliency. ACM Transactions on Graphics 24 3 (2005) 659-666
15. Cover T.M., and Thomas J.A. Elements of information theory. Wiley series in telecommunications (1991)
16. Vázquez PP, Feixas M, Sbert M, Heidrich W. Viewpoint selection using viewpoint entropy. In: Proceedings of vision, modeling, and visualization 2001, Stuttgart, Germany, 2001. p. 273-80.
17. Vázquez PP, Feixas M, Sbert M, Heidrich W. Automatic view selection using viewpoint entropy and its application to image-based modeling. Computer Graphics Forum, December 2003. p. 689-700.
18. Sbert M, Plemenos D, Feixas M, González F. Viewpoint quality: measures and applications. In: Computational aesthetics in graphics, visualization and imaging 2005, Girona, May 2005. p. 1-8.
19. Bordoloi U, Shen HW. View selection for volume rendering. In: Proceedings of IEEE visualization 2005, Minneapolis, USA, May 2005. p. 62.
20. Takahashi S, Fujishiro I, Takeshima Y, Nishita T. A feature-driven approach to locating optimal viewpoints for volume visualization. In: Proceedings of IEEE visualization 2005, Minneapolis, USA, 2005. p. 495-502.
21. Rigau J., Feixas M., and Sbert M. Shape complexity based on mutual information. IEEE international conference on shape modeling and applications (2005) 357-362
22. Cheng I, Boulanger P. Scale-space 3D TexMesh simplification, ICME '04. In: 2004 IEEE international conference on multimedia and expo 2004, vol. 1, June 2004. p. 141-44.
23. Castelló P, Sbert M, Chover M, Feixas M. Techniques for computing viewpoint entropy of a 3D scene. In: Proceedings of the ICCS 2006, Reading, UK. p. 263-70.
24. Staadt GO, Gross HM. Progressive tetrahedralizations. In: VIS '98: proceedings of the conference on IEEE visualization '98, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 1998. p. 397-402.
25. Melax S. A simple, fast, and effective polygon reduction algorithm. Game Developer, November 1998. p. 44-8.
26. Castelló P, Ramos JF, Chover M. A comparative study of acceleration techniques for geometric visualization. In: Proceedings of the ICCS 2005, Atlanta, USA. p. 240-7.
27. Watson B, Friedman A, McGaffey A. Measuring and predicting visual fidelity. In: IGGRAPH '01: proceedings of the 28th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques, 2001. p. 213-20.
28. Cheng I., and Boulanger P. A 3d perceptual metric using just-noticeable-difference. Eurographics short presentations (2005) 97-100
29. Howlett S., Hamill J., and O'Sullivan C. Predicting and evaluating saliency for simplified polygonal models. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 2 3 (2005) 286-308
30. Cignoni P., Rocchini C., and Scopigno R. Metro: measuring error on simplified surfaces. Computer Graphics Forum 17 2 (1998) 267-274
31. Tsallis C. Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics. Journal of Statistical Physics 52 (1988) 479-487