Visibility-guided simplification

Proceedings of the IEEE Visualization Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 267-274

  Zhang, Eugene ^a   Turk, Greg ^a  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Mesh Simplification; Rendering; Visibility; Visualization

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CAMERAS; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; ERROR ANALYSIS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; VISIBILITY; VISUALIZATION;

MESH SURFACES;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 0036453206     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Appel, A., Some Techniques for Shading Machine Renderings of Solids, SJCC, 1968, pp. 37-45.
2. Bouknight, W.J., A procedure for Generation of ThreeDimensional Half-toned Computer Graphics Representations, Corem, ACM 13, 9, September 1969.
3. Catmull, E., A Subdivision Algorithm for Computer Display of Curved Surfaces, Ph.D Thesis, Report UTEC-CSc-74-133, Computer Science Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, December 1974.
4. Cignoni, P., Rocchini, C., and Scopigno, R., Metro: measuring error on simplified surfaces, Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 167-174, June 1998.
5. Cohen, M.F., and Greenberg, D.P., The Hemi-Cube: A Radiosity Solution for Complex Environments, Computer Graphics Proceedings, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 31-40, 1985.
6. Fekete, G., and Davis, L.S., Property spheres: a new representation for 3-D object recognition, Proceedings of the Workshop on Computer Vision: Representation and Control, Annapolis, MD, April 30-May 2, 1984, pp. 192-201.
7. Fuchs, H., Kedem, Z.M., and Naylor, B.F., On Visible Surface Generation by A Priori Tree Structures, S1GGRAPH 80, 1980, pp. 124-133.
8. Garland, M. and Heckbert, P.S., Surface Simplification using Quadric Error Metrics, Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series (SIGGRAPH 97), pp. 209-216.
9. Gigus, Z., and Malik, J., Computing the aspect graph for the line drawings of polyhedral objects, IEEE Trans. on Pat. Matching & Mach. Intelligence, February 1990, 12(2).
10. Hebert, M., and Kanade, T., The 3-D profile method for object recognition, Proceedings, CVPR '85 (IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), San Francisco, CA, June 1985, pp. 458-463.
11. Hoppe, H., Progressive Meshes, Computer Graphics, (SIGGRAPH 1996 Proceedings), pages 99-108.
12. Hoppe, H., New quadric metric for simplifying meshes with appearance attributes, IEEE Visualization 1999, October 1999, pp. 59-66.
13. Koenderink, J.J., and Vandoorn, A.J., The singularities of the visual mapping, BioCyber, 1976, 24(1), pp. 51-59.
14. Levoy, M., Pulei, K., Curless, B., Ruskinkiewicz, S., Koller, D., Pereira, L., Ginzton, M., Anderson, S., Davis, J., Ginsberg, J., Shade, J., and Fuek, D., The Digital Michelangelo Project: 3D Scanning of Large Statues, SIGGRAPH Proceedings 2000, 2000, pp. 131-144.
15. Lindstrom, P. and Turk, G., Image-Driven Simplification, ACM Transcation on Graphics, 19(3), July 2000, pp. 204-241.
16. Myers, A.J., An Efficient Visible Surface Program, Report to National Science Foundation, Computer Graphics Research Group, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, July 1975.
17. Nooruddin, F.S, and Turk, G., Interior/Exterior Classification of Polygonal Models, Visualization 2000 Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, Oct. 8-13, 2000, pp. 415-422.
18. Plantinga, W.H., and Dyer, C.R., An algorithm for constructing the aspect graph, 27th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Los Angeles, Ca., USA, October 1986, pp. 123-131.
19. Ronfard, R., and Rossignac, J., Full-range approximations of triangulated polyhedra, Proceedings of Eurographics96, Computer Graphics Forum, pp. C-67, Vol. 15, No. 3, August 1996.
20. Schumacker, R.A., Brand, B., Gilliland, M., and Sharp, W., Study for Applying Computer Generated Images to Visual Simulation, AFHRL-TR-69-14, US Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, September 1969.
21. Stewman, J.,and Bowyer, K., Direct construction of the perspective projection aspect graph of convex polyhedra, Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, July 1990, 51(1), pp. 20-37.
22. Sutherland, I.E., Sproull, R.F. and Schumacker, R.A., A characterization of ten hidden-surface algorithms, ACM Computing Survey, 6(1), March 1974, pp. 1-55.
23. Taubin, G., A signal Processing Approach to Fail Surface Design, Computer Graphics Proceedings, (SIGGRAPH 1995 Proceedings) August 1995, pp. 351-358.
24. Warnock, J.E., A Hidden-Surface Algorithm for Computer-Generated Halftone Pictures, Computer Science Department, University of Utah, TR 4-15, June 1969.
25. Watkins, G.S., A Real-Time Visible Surface Algorithm, Computer Science Department, University of Utah, UTECH-CSC-70-101, June 1970.
26. Watts, N.A., Calculating the principle views of polyhedron, Ninth International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Rome, Italy, November 1988, pp. 316-322.
27. Weiler, K., and Atherton, P., Hidden Surface Removal Using Polygon Area Sorting, SIGGRAPH 77, pp. 214-222.
28. Whitted, T., An Improved Illumination Model for Shaded Display, ACAM, 23(6), June 1980, pp. 343-349.