Questionnaires for 360-degree assessment of consultant psychiatrists: Development and psychometric properties

British Journal of Psychiatry

Volumn 193, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 156-160

  Lelliott, Paul ^a   Williams, Richard ^b   Mears, Alex ^a   Andiappan, Manoharan ^a   Owen, Helen ^c   Reading, Paul ^c   Coyle, Nick ^a   Hunter, Stephen ^d  

^a ROYAL COLLEGE OF PSYCHIATRISTS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLAMORGAN   (United Kingdom)

^c National Leadership and Innovation Agency for Healthcare

^d ANEURIN BEVAN UNIVERSITY HEALTH BOARD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACP 360 DEGREE QUESTIONNAIRE; ARTICLE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PSYCHIATRIST; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CONSULTANTS; HUMANS; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; PEER REVIEW, HEALTH CARE; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PSYCHIATRY; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 49149093991     PISSN: 00071250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.041681     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. GMC, 2006.
2. Ramsey PG, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Innu TS, Larson EB, LoGerfo JP. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. JAMA 1993; 269: 1655-60.
3. Violate C, Marini A, Towes J, Fidler H. Feasibility and psychometric properties of using peers, consulting physicians, co-workers, and patients to assess physicians. Acad Med 1997; 72 (suppl 1): S82-4.
4. Hall W, Violato C, Lewkonia R. Assessment of physician performance in Alberta: the Physician Achievement Review. CMAJ 1999; 161: 52-6.
5. Violato C, Lockyer J, Fidler H. Multisource feedback: a method of assessing surgical practice. BMJ 2003; 326: 546-8.
6. Archer JC, Norcini J, Davies A. Use of SPRAT for peer review of paediatricians in training. BMJ 2005; 308: 1251-3.
7. Antonioni, D. Designing an effective 360-degree appraisal feedback process. Organisational Dynamics 1996; 25: 24-38.
8. Flanagan JC. The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull 1954; 51: 327-58.
9. Dunn WR, Hamilton DD. The critical incident technique - a brief guide. Med Teach 1986; 8: 207-15.
10. Kelly GA. The Psychology of Personal Constructs. Norton, 1963.
11. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420-8.
12. Crocker L, Algina J. Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1986.
13. McDermott A, Hasler J. 360° feedback: how do perceptions of doctors' attributes compare? Clin Governance Bull 2004; 5: 3-4.
14. Royal College of Psychiatrists. Good Psychiatric Practice (2nd edn) (Council Report CR125). Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2004.
15. Evans R, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Review of instruments for peer assessment of physicians. BMJ 2004; 328: 1240.
16. Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA 2006; 296: 1094-102.
17. Davies H, Archer J, Heard S, Southgate L. Assessment tools for foundation programmes - a practical guide. BMJ 2005; 330: 195-6.
18. National Health Service. Modernising Medical Careers. NHS, 2006 (http://www.mmc.nhs.uk/pages/assessment/msf).
19. Department of Health. Trust, Assurance and Safety: The Regulation of Health Professionals. Cm 7013. TSO (The Stationery Office), 2007.
20. Baker R. Commentary: can poorly performing doctors blame their assessment tools? BMJ 2005; 330: 1254.
21. Donaldson L. Good Doctors, Safer Patients. Department of Health, 2006.
22. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta. Physician Achievement Review. 2006. (http://www.par-program.org/PAR-info.htm).