A case study of evolutionary computation of biochemical adaptation

Physical Biology

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2008, Pages

  François, Paul ^a   Siggia, Eric D ^a  

^a ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; BIOCHEMICAL ADAPTATION; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; GENE NETWORK; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MUTATION; PHOSPHORYLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; ALGORITHM; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BIOCHEMISTRY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; GENETICS;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ALGORITHMS; BIOCHEMISTRY; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER);

EID: 48949119102     PISSN: 14783967     EISSN: 14783975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/5/2/026009     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Nilsson D E and Pelger S 1994 A pessimistic estimate of the time required for an eye to evolve Proc. Biol. Sci. 256 53-8
2. François P, Hakim V and Siggia E D 2007 Deriving structure from evolution: metazoan segmentation Mol. Syst. Biol. 3 154
3. François P and Hakim V 2004 Design of genetic networks with specified functions by evolution in silico Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101 580-5
4. Soyer O S, Pfeiffer T and Bonhoeffer S 2006 Simulating the evolution of signal transduction pathways J. Theor. Biol. 241 223-32
5. Matthews H R, Murphy R L, Fain G L and Lamb T D 1988 Photoreceptor light adaptation is mediated by cytoplasmic calcium concentration Nature 334 67-9
6. Nakatani K and Yau K W 1988 Calcium and light adaptation in retinal rods and cones Nature 334 69-71
7. Marshall C J 1995 Specificity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: transient versus sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation Cell 80 179-85
8. Kholodenko B N 2006 Cell-signalling dynamics in time and space Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7 165-76
9. Block S M, Segall J E and Berg H C 1983 Adaptation kinetics in bacterial chemotaxis J. Bacteriol. 154 312-23
10. Behar M, Hao N, Dohlman H G and Elston T C 2007 Mathematical and computational analysis of adaptation via feedback inhibition in signal transduction pathways Biophys. J. 93 806-21
11. Lewis J 2003 Autoinhibition with transcriptional delay: a simple mechanism for the zebrafish somitogenesis oscillator Curr. Biol. 13 1398-408
12. Monk N A M 2003 Oscillatory expression of hes1, p53, and nf-kappab driven by transcriptional time delays Curr. Biol. 13 1409-13
13. Lenski R E, Ofria C, Collier T C and Adami C 1999 Genome complexity, robustness and genetic interactions in digital organisms Nature 400 661-4
14. Adami C 2006 Digital genetics: unravelling the genetic basis of evolution Nat. Rev. Genet. 7 109-18
15. Neyfakh A A, Baranova N N and Mizrokhi L J 2006 A system for studying evolution of life-like virtual organisms Biol. Direct. 1 23
16. Bergman A and Siegal M L 2003 Evolutionary capacitance as a general feature of complex gene networks Nature 424 549-52
17. Wagner A 2005 Robustness and Evolvability in Living Systems (Princeton Studies in Complexity) (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)
18. Ferguson S S and Caron M G 1998 G protein-coupled receptor adaptation mechanisms Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 9 119-27
19. Premont R T and Gainetdinov R R 2007 Physiological roles of g protein-coupled receptor kinases and arrestins Annu. Rev. Physiol. 69 511-34
20. Violin J D, DiPilato L M, Yildirim N, Elston T C, Zhang J and Lefkowitz R J 2008 Beta2-adrenergic receptor signaling and desensitization elucidated by quantitative modeling of real time camp dynamics J. Biol. Chem. 283 2949-61
21. Barkai N and Leibler S 1997 Robustness in simple biochemical networks Nature 387 913-7
22. Yi T M, Huang Y, Simon M I and Doyle J 2000 Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97 4649-53
23. Sourjik V and Berg H C 2002 Receptor sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99 123-7
24. Rao C V, Kirby J R and Arkin A P 2004 Design and diversity in bacterial chemotaxis: a comparative study in escherichia coli and bacillus subtilis PLoS Biol. 2 E49
25. Emonet T and Cluzel P 2008 Relationship between cellular response and behavioral variability in bacterial chemotaxis Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105 3304-9
26. Bray D, Levin M D and Morton-Firth C J 1998 Receptor clustering as a cellular mechanism to control sensitivity Nature 393 85-8
27. Levchenko A and Iglesias P A 2002 Models of eukaryotic gradient sensing: application to chemotaxis of amoebae and neutrophils Biophys. J. 82 50-63
28. Yang L and Iglesias P A 2006 Positive feedback may cause the biphasic response observed in the chemoattractant-induced response of dictyostelium cells Syst. Control Lett. 55 329-37
29. Ziv E, Nemenman I and Wiggins C H 2007 Optimal signal processing in small stochastic biochemical networks PLoS ONE 2 e1077