Conceptual PHES-system models of the Aysén watershed and fjord (Southern Chile): Testing a brainstorming strategy

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 88, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1109-1118

  Marín, Víctor H ^a   Delgado, Luisa E ^a   Bachmann, Pamela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Brainstorming; Conceptual models; Integrated management; Stakeholder's participation

Indexed keywords

BRAINSTORMING; CONCEPTUAL MODEL; INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT SCENARIOS; SOCIAL SYSTEMS; STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION; SYSTEM MODELS;

WATERSHEDS;

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; FJORD; FLOW MODELING; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; INTEGRATED APPROACH; STAKEHOLDER; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATERSHED;

ARTICLE; BRAINSTORMING; CHILE; CONCEPT ANALYSIS; CONCEPT FORMATION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ECOSYSTEM; EXPERT SYSTEM; PROBLEM SOLVING; STATISTICAL MODEL; WATERSHED MANAGEMENT;

AISEN; CHILE; SOUTH AMERICA;

EID: 48949118518     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.05.012     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Burt G., and van der Heijden K. First steps: towards purposeful activities in scenatio thinking and future studies. Futures 35 (2003) 1011-1026
2. Chermack Th. Improving decision-making with scenario planning. Futures 36 (2004) 295-309
3. Cundill G.N.R., Fabricius C., and Marti N. Foghorns to the future: using knowledge and transdisciplinarity to navigate complex systems. Ecology and Society 10 2 (2005) 8. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art8/ [online] URL: 〈http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art8/〉
4. Delgado L., and Marín V. Bahía Mejillones: un ecosistema para conservar. Chile Acuícola 4 (2001) 23-26
5. Freudenberg W.R., and Alario M. What ecologists can learn from nuclear scientists. Ecosystems 2 (1999) 286-291
6. Hartmann, P., 2003. Medio ambiente, comunidades, ecosistemas y salud humana y el caso del megaproyecto Alumysa en Aisén, Patagonia Chilena. URL 〈http://www.aisenreservadevida.cl〉 (last accessed: 10 November 2006).
7. Heemskerk M., Wilson K., and Pavao-Zuckerman M. Conceptual models as tools for communication across disciplines. Conservation Ecology 7 3 (2003) 8. http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss3/art8 [online] URL: 〈http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss3/art8〉
8. INE. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas (2002), National Population Census 2002 [CD-ROM], Santiago, Chile
9. Jones S. Social constructionism and the environment: through the quagmire. Global Environmental Change 12 (2002) 247-251
10. Kay J. Ecosystems, science and sustainability. In: Ulgiati S., Brown M.T., Giampietro M., Herendeen R., and Mayumi K. (Eds). Proceedings of the International Workshop: Advances in Energy Studies: Exploring Supplies, Constraints and Strategies (2001), Porto Venere, Italy 319-328
11. Lee K. Compass and Gyroscope. Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment (1993), Island Press, Washington, DC
12. Ludwig D. The era of management is over. Ecosystems 4 (2001) 758-764
13. Marín V., and Delgado L. El manejo ecosistémico de los recursos marinos vivos: Un desafío eco-social. In: Figueroa E. (Ed). Biodiversidad Marina: Valoración, usos y perspectivas. ¿Hacia dónde va Chile? (2005), Editorial Universitaria, Santiago 555-570
14. Marín V., and Olivares G. Estacionalidad de la productividad primaria en Bahía Mejillones del Sur: una aproximación proceso-funcional. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 72 (1999) 629-641
15. Mysiak J., Giupponi C., and Rosato P. Towards the development of s decision support system for water resource management. Environmental Modelling and Software 20 (2005) 203-214
16. Nicolson C.R., Starfield A.M., Kofinas G.P., and Kuse J.A. Ten heuristics for interdisciplinary modeling projects. Ecosystems 5 (2002) 376-384
17. O'Neill R. Is it time to bury the ecosystem concept? (With full military honours, of course!). Ecology 82 (2001) 3275-3284
18. Ortega, H., Brünning, A., 2000. Aisén. Panorama histórico y cultural. XI Región. 2004. 〈http://www.aisenpanorama.cl/libro.htm〉.
19. Theobald D.M., and Hobbs N.T. A framework for evaluating land use planning alternatives: protecting biodiversity on private land. Conservation Ecology 6 1 (2002) 5. http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art5 [online] URL: 〈http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art5〉