What ecologists can learn from nuclear scientists

Ecosystems

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 286-291

  Freudenburg, William R ^a   Alario, Margarita ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Chicago; Chicago wilderness; Controversy; Ecological restoration; Environmental policy; Scientific research; Social science; Sociology

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032875273     PISSN: 14329840     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s100219900077     Document Type: Note

References (18)

1. Coffey RR. 1998 Aug 13. Keep fires burning close to home. Chicago Sun-Times:27.
2. Cronon, W. 1991. Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. New York: W.W. Norton.
3. Erikson, KT, Colglazier EW, White GF. 1994. Nuclear waste's human dimension. Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy (Fall):91-7.
4. Freudenburg WR, Baxter RK. 1984. Host community attitudes toward nuclear power plants: a reassessment. Soc Sci Q 65: 1129-36.
5. Freudenburg WR, Baxter RK. 1985. Nuclear reactions: public attitudes and public policies toward nuclear power plants. Policy Stud Rev 5(August):96-110.
6. Freudenburg WR, Rosa EA, editors. 1984. Public reactions to nuclear power: are there critical masses? Boulder, CO: American Association for the Advancement of Science/Westview.
7. Freudenburg WR, Frickel S, Dwyer R. 1998. Diversity and diversion: higher superstition and the dangers of insularity in science and technology studies. Int J Soc Social Policy 18(5/6): 6-34.
8. Freudenburg WR, Pastor SK. 1992. Public responses to technological risks: Toward a sociological perspective. Sociological Qtrly 33:389-412.
9. [NAS/NRC] National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council. 1992. Assessment of the U.S. outer continental shelf environmental studies program: III. Social and economic studies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, National Academy of Sciences.
10. [NAS/NRC] National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council. 1996. Review of New York State low-level radioactive waste siting process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, National Academy of Sciences.
11. Park RE. 1936. Human ecology. Am J Soc 42(July):1-15.
12. Popper FJ. 1981. Siting LULUs. J Amer Planning Assn 47:12-15.
13. Public Opinion. 1979. Opinion roundup. Public Opin 2(3, June/July):21-40.
14. Rosa EA, Freudenburg WR. 1993. The historical development of public reactions to nuclear power: implication for nuclear waste policy. In: Dunlap RE, Kraft ME, Rosa EA, editors. Public reactions to nuclear waste: citizens' views of repository siting. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, p 32-63.
15. Slovic, P. 1987. Perception of Risk. Science 236:280-85.
16. Strauss L. 1954. Remarks prepared for delivery at Founders' Day Dinner, National Association of Science Writers. New York City, September 16.
17. US [AEC] Atomic Energy Commission. 1968. Annual report to congress of the atomic energy commission for 1967. Washington, DC: U.S. Atomic Energy Commission.
18. US [AEC] Atomic Energy Commission. 1970. Press release S-18-170. Washington, DC: U.S. Atomic Energy Commission.