Continuous and discrete adjoint approaches for aerodynamic shape optimization with low Mach number preconditioning

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 57, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1485-1504

  Asouti, V G ^a   Zymaris, A S ^a   Papadimitriou, D I ^a   Giannakoglou, K C ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Adjoint approach; Aerodynamic shape optimization; Low Mach number preconditioning

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; AERODYNAMICS; AEROSPACE APPLICATIONS; AIR; COMPRESSIBILITY; FLUID DYNAMICS; FLUID MECHANICS; GAS DYNAMICS; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; MACH NUMBER; METAL WORKING SHAPERS; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; OPTIMIZATION; SPEED; STANDARDS; TURBOMACHINERY; VISCOUS FLOW;

ADJOINT; ADJOINT APPROACH; ADJOINT EQUATIONS; AERODYNAMIC SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; EXTERNAL-; FLOW CONDITIONING; FLOW EQUATIONS; FLOW SPEEDS; LOW MACH NUMBER PRECONDITIONING; LOW MACH NUMBERS; MACH NUMBERS; MATHEMATICAL DEVELOPMENT; OPTIMIZATION CYCLES; OPTIMIZATION METHODS; TURBOMACHINERY FLOWS;

SHAPE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 48749126129     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1667     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anderson WK, Newman JC, Whitfield DL, Nielsen EJ. Sensitivity analysis for the Navier-Stokes equations on unstructured meshes using complex variables. Fourteenth AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Norfolk, VA, AIAA Paper 1999-3294, June 1999.
2. Nadarajah S, Jameson A. A comparison of the continuous and discrete adjoint approach to automatic aerodynamic optimization. Thirty-eighth AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, AIAA Paper 2000-0667, January 2000.
3. Pironneau O. Optimal Shape Design for Elliptic Systems. Springer: New York, 1984.
4. Jameson A. Aerodynamic design via control theory. Journal of Scientific Computing 1998; 3:233-260.
5. Jameson A. Optimum aerodynamic design using CFD and control theory. Twelfth AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, CA, AIAA Paper 1995-1729, June 1995.
6. Jameson A, Pierce N, Martinelli L. Optimum aerodynamic design using the Navier-Stokes equations. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 1998; 10:213-237
7. Anderson WK, Venkatakrishnan V. Aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured grids with a continuous adjoint formulation. Thirty-fifth AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, AIAA Paper 1997-0643, January 1997.
8. Pierce NA, Giles MB. An introduction to the adjoint approach to design. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 2000; 65:393-415.
9. Nielsen EJ, Lu J, Park MA, Darmofal DL. An implicit, exact dual adjoint solution method for turbulent flows on unstructured grids. Computers and Fluids 2004; 33:1131-1155.
10. Reuther J, Rimlinger MJ, Alonso JJ, Jameson A. Aerodynamic shape optimization of supersonic aircraft configurations via an adjoint formulation on distributed memory parallel computers. Sixth AIAA/USAF/ NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Bellevue, WA, AIAA Paper 1996-4045, September 1996.
11. Jameson A, Shankaran S, Martinelli L, Haimes B. Aerodynamic shape optimization of complete aircraft configuration. Forty-second AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, AIAA Paper 2004-0533, January 2004.
12. Kim H, Sasaki D, Obayashi S, Nakahashi K. Aerodynamic optimization of supersonic transport wing using unstructured adjoint method. AIAA Journal 2001; 39:1011-1020.
13. Anderson WK, Bonhaus DL. Airfoil design on unstructured grids for turbulent flows. AIAA Journal 1999; 37:185-191.
14. Giles MB. Discrete adjoint approximations with shocks. Hyperbolic Problems: Theory, Numerics, Applications. Springer: Berlin, 2003.
15. Harbeck M, Jameson A. Exploring the limits of transonic shock-free airfoil design. Forty-third AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, AIAA Paper 2005-1041, January 2005.
16. Papadimitriou D, Giannakoglou K. Compressor blade optimization using a continuous adjoint formulation. ASME Gas Turbine & Aeroengine Technical Congress and Exposition, Barcelona, Spain, ASME Paper GT2006-90466, May 2006.
17. Nadarajah S, McMullen M, Jameson A. Non-linear frequency domain based optimum shape design for unsteady three-dimensional flow. Forty-fourth AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, AIAA Paper 2006-1052, January 2006.
18. Thomas JP, Hall KC, Dowell EH. A discrete adjoint approach for modeling unsteady aerodynamic design sensitivities. Forty-first AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, AIAA Paper 2003-0041, January 2003.
19. Kuruvila G, Taasan S, Salas MD. Airfoil design and optimization by the one-shot method. Thirty-third AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, AIAA Paper 1995-478, January 1995.
20. Hazra S, Schulz V, Brezillon J, Gauger N. Aerodynamic shape optimization using simultaneous pseudo-timestepping. Journal of Computational Physics 2005; 204:46-64.
21. Dadone A, Grossman B. Fast convergence of inviscid fluid dynamic design problems. Computers and Fluids 2003; 32:607-627.
22. Mohammadi B, Pironneau O. Shape optimization in fluid mechanics. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 2004; 36:255-279.
23. Soto O, Lohner R. On the computation of flow sensitivities from boundary integrals. Forty-second AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, AIAA Paper 2004-0112, January 2004.
24. Turkel E. Preconditioned methods for solving the incompressible and low speed compressible equations. Journal of Computational Physics 1987; 72:277-298.
25. Eriksson LE. A preconditioned Navier-Stokes solver for low mach number flows. Third ECCOMAS CFD Conference, Paris, September 1996.
26. Choi YH, Merkle CL. The application of preconditioning in viscous flows. Journal of Computational Physics 1993; 105:207-233.
27. Papadimitriou D, Giannakoglou K. A continuous adjoint method with objective function derivatives based on boundary integrals for inviscid and viscous flows. Computers and Fluids 2007; 36:325-341.
28. Roe PL. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1981; 43:357-372.
29. van Leer B, Lee WT, Roe PL. Characteristic time-stepping or local preconditioning of the Euler equations. Tenth AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Honolulu, HI, AIAA Paper 1991-1552, June 1991.
30. Spalart P, Allmaras S. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. La Recherche Aerospatiale 1994; 1:5-21.
31. Forest AR. Interactive interpolation and approximation by Bézier polynomials. The Computer Journal 1972; 15:71-79.