Shape optimization in fluid mechanics

Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics

Volumn 36, Issue , 2004, Pages 255-279

  Mohammadi, Bijan ^a   Pironneau, Olivier ^a  

^a INSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE DE FRANCE   (France)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Aerodynamics; Complexity; Sensitivity; Shape design

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; JETS; SHOCK WAVES;

ALGORITHMIC DIFFERENTIATION; OPTIMAL SHAPE DESIGN (OSD);

SUPERSONIC FLOW;

AERODYNAMICS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; FLUID MECHANICS; MATHEMATICAL METHOD; SHAPE;

EID: 1642307281     PISSN: 00664189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.36.050802.121926     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Allaire G, Jouve F, Toader AM. 2002. A level-set method for shape optimization. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 334:1125-30
2. Alonso JJ, Kroo IM, Jameson A. 2002. Advanced algoritms for design and optimization of QSP. AIAA Pap. 2002-0144. Reno, NV
3. Anagnostou G, Ronquist E, Patera A. 1992. A computational procedure for part design. Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 20:257-70
4. Arian E, Ta'asan S. 1995. Shape optimization in one-shot. In Optimal Design and Control, ed. J Boggaard, J Burkardt, M Gunzburger, J Peterson, pp. 273-94. Boston: Birkhauser
5. Bardos C, Pironneau O. 2002. A formalism for the differentiation of conservation laws. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, Ser. I. 335(10):839-45
6. Baron F, O Pironneau 1993. Multidisciplinary optimal design of a wing prole, in Structural Optimization 93, The World Congress on Optimal Design of Structural Systems, ed. J Herskovits, Vol. 2, pp. 61-68, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: UFRJ Press
7. Becache E, Chaigne A, Derveaux G, Joly P. 2001. Numerical simulation of a guitar. Proc. Eur. Conf. Comput. Mech. Krakow, Poland. In press
8. Beux F, Dervieux A. 1993. A Hierarchical Approach for Shape Optimization, Inria Rapports de Recherche 1868.
9. Bischof C, Carle A, Corliss G, Griewank A, Hovland P. 1992. ADIFOR: Generating derivative codes from Fortran programs. Sci. Progr. 1(1): 11-29
10. Borwall J, Petersson B. 2002. Topological optimization of fluids in stokes flow. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 42(9):224-65
11. Cea J. 1980. Numerical methods of shape optimal design. In Optimization of Distributed Parameter Structures, ed. EJ Haug, J Cea. Alphen dall den Rijn, Netherlands: Sijthoff & Noordholl
12. Chenais D. 1987. Shape optimization in shell theory. Eng. Optim. 11:289-303
13. Delfour M, Zolezio JP. 2001. Shapes and Geometries: Analysis, Differential Calculus and Optimization. Advances in Design and Control 4. Philadelphia: SIAM
14. Elliott J, Peraire J. 1996. Aerodynamic design using unstructured meshes. AIAA 96:1941
15. Farin G. 1987. Curves and Surfaces for Computer Aided Geometric Design. 2001. 5th ed. Boston: Academic Press
16. Faure C. 1996. Splitting of algebraic expressions for automatic differentiation. Proc. 2nd SIAM Workshop Comput. Differ. Santa Fe, NM
17. Garreau S, Guillaume P, Masmoudi M. 2001. The topological asymptotic for PDE systems: the elasticity case. SIAM J. Control Optim. 39(6):1756-78
18. George PL. 1991. Automatic Mesh Generation. Applications to Finite Element Method. New York: Wiley
19. Gilbert JC, Le Vey G, Masse J. 1991. La différentiation automatique de fonctions représentées par des programmes. INRIA Rapport de Recherche 1557.
20. Giles MA, Pierce NA. 2001. Analytic adjoint solutions for the quasi-one-dimensional euler equations. J. Fluid Mech. 426:327-45
21. Giunta A. 1997. Aircraft multidisciplinary design optimization using design of experiements theory and response surface modeling. M.A.D. center rep. 97-05-01. Virginia Tech.
22. Godlewski E, Olazabal M, Raviart PA. 1998. On the linearization of hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. Application to stability. In Equations aux Dérivées Partielles et Applications, ed. D Cioranescu, JL Lions, pp. 549-70. Gauthier-Villars, Paris: Elsevier
23. 0. Rapport de Recherche INRIA 1000
24. Griewank A. 2000. Evaluating Derivatives, Principles and Techniques of Algorithmic Differentiation. Number 19 in Frontiers in Appl. Math. SIAM, Philadelphia
25. Hamda H, Schoenauer M. 2000. Adaptive Techniques for Evolutionary Topological Optimum Design. In Evolutionary Design and Manufacture, ed. IC Parmee, pp. 250-65. Springer-Verlag
26. Hamalainen J, Malkamaki T, Toivanen J. 1999. Genetic algorithms in shape optimization of a paper machine headbox, in Evolutionary Algorithms in Engineering and Computer Science, ed. K Miettinen, M Makela, P Neittaanmaki, J Periaux, pp. 435-43. Wiley
27. Haslinger J, Makinen R. 2003. Introduction to Shape Optimization. SIAM Ser. Adv. Des. Control, Vol. 7
28. Hirsch C, Shun K. 2001. Numerical investigation of the 3D flow around NREL untwisted wind turbine blades. Proc. 4th Conf. Turbo-mach. Florence, Italy. In press
29. Jameson A. 1988. Aerodynamics design via control theory. J. Sci. Comp. 3:233-60
30. Jameson A. 2003. Aerodynamic Design and Optimization, Antony Jameson,.16th AIAA Comput. Fluid Dynamics Conf., AIAA Pap. A-2003-3438, Orlando, FL, June 23-26
31. Jameson A,, Martinelli L, Pierce NA. 1998. Optimum aerodynamic design using the Navier-Stokes equations. Theoret. Comp. Fluid Dynamics 10:213-37
32. Kim SK, Alonso J, Jameson A. 1999. A Gradient Accuracy Study for the Adjoint-Based Navier-Stokes Design Method, 37th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Mtg. & Exhibit, AIAA Pap. 99-0299, Reno, NV, January
33. Lemarchand G, Pironneau O, Polak E. 2002. Incomplete gradients. Proc. Domain Decompos. Methods Sci. Eng. Lyon, France. In press
34. Lions JL. 1968. Contrôle Optimal de systèmes gouvernés par des équations aux dérivées partielles. Dunod-Gauthier Villars
35. Lohner R. 2001. Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics Techniques: An Introduction Based on Finite Element Methods. Chichester: Wiley 376 pp.
36. Lorenz E. 1963. Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 20:130-41
37. Makinen R, Periaux J, Toivanen J. 1999. Multidisciplinary shape optimization in aerodynamics and electromagnetics using genetic algorithms. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 30:149-59
38. Marrocco A, Pironneau O. 1978. Optimum design of a magnet with lagrangian finite elements. Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 15(3):512-45
39. Marsden AL, Wang M, Mohammadi B, Moin P. 2001. Shape optimization for aerodynamic noise control. Annu. Res. Briefs, Cent. Turb. Res., pp. 241-47. NASA Ames/Stanford Univ.
40. Marsden AL, Wang M, Koumoutsakos P, Moin P. 2002. Optimal aeroacoustic shape design using approximation modeling. Cent. Turb. Res. Briefs 201:213
41. Mohammadi B. 1994. CFD with NSC2KE: user-guide. Note Technique INRIA 164
42. Mohammadi B. 2002. Optimization of aerodynamic and acoustic performances of supersonic civil transports. Proc. CTR Summer Program 2002, Stanford, CA. In press
43. Mohammadi B, Pironneau O. 2001. Applied Shape Optimization for Fluids. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
44. Mohammadi B, Saiac JH. 2002. Pratique de la Simulation Numérique. Paris: Dunod Publisher
45. Mohammadi B, Santiago JG. 2001. Simulation and design of extraction and separation fluidic devices. Esaim M2AN 35(3):513-23
46. Choi H, Moin P, Kim J. 1992. Turbulent drag reduction: studies of feedback control and flow over riblets. CTR Rep. TF-55. Stanford, CA
47. Murat F, Simon J. 1976. Etude de problémes d'optimum design. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 41:54-62
48. Murat F, Tartar L. 1987. On the control of coefficients in partial differential equations. Topics in the Mathematical Modelling of Composite Materials, ed. A Cherkaev, R Kohn. pp. 1-8. Boston: Birkhauser
49. Nadarajah S, Jameson A, Alonso J. 2002. Sonic boom reduction using an adjoint method for wing-body configurations in supersonic flow. AIAA-2002-5547, 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symp. Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conf., Atlanta, GA. September 4-6
50. Neittaanmaki P. 1991. Computer aided optimal structural design. Surv. Math. Ind. 1:173-215
51. Obayashi S. 1997. Pareto Genetic Algorithm for aerodynamic design using the Navier-Stokes equations. In Genetic Algorithms and Evolution Strategies in Engineering and Computer Science, ed. D Quagliarella et al., pp. 245-66. Chichester: Wiley
52. Peri D, Campana EF. 2003. High fidelity models in the multi-disciplinary optimization of a frigate ship Second M.I.T. Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics. Cambridge, MA, June
53. Periaux J, Mantel B, Sefrioui M, Stoufflet B, Desideri J, et al. 1998. Evolutionary computational methods for complex design in aerodynamics. AIAA Pap. 98-222
54. Pironneau O. 1973. On optimal shapes for Stokes flow. J. Fluid Mech. 70(2):331-40
55. Pironneau O. 1984. Optimal Shape Design for Elliptic Systems. Springer Series in Computational Physics. New York: Springer-Verlag
56. Quagliarella D, Vicini A. 1997. Coupling Genetic Algorithms and Gradient Based Optimization Techniques. In Genetic Algorithms and Evolution Strategies in Engineering and Computer Science, ed. D Quagliarella et al., pp. 289-309. Chichester: Wiley
57. Reuther J, Jameson A, Farmer J, Martinelli L, Saunders D. 1996. Aerodynamic shape optimization of complex aircraft congurations via an adjoint formulation AIAA Pap. 96:94
58. Rostaing N, Dalmas S, Galligo A. 1993. Automatic differentiation in Odyssee. Tellus 45a(5):558-68
59. Sokolowski J, Zolezio JP. 1991. Introduction to shape optimization. Shape sensitivity analysis. Springer Ser. Comput. Math. Vol. 16
60. Sverak A. 1992. On existence of solution for a class of optimal shape design problems. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. I. 315(5):545-49
61. Sverak V. 1993. On optimal design. J. Maths. Pures Appl. 72:537-51
62. Tartar L. 1974. Control problems in the coefficients of PDE. In Control Theory, Numerical Methods and Computer Systems Modelling (Internat. Sympos., IRIA LABORIA, Rocquencourt, 1974), pp. 420-426. Lecture Notes in Econom. and Math. Systems, 107. Berlin: Springer
63. Thomas Ch L. 1972. Extrapolation of sonic boom pressure signatures by the waveform parameter method. NASA TN. D-6832
64. Whitham GB. 1952. The flow pattern of a supersonic projectile. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 5(3):301-48