Parametric subject-specific model for in vivo 3D reconstruction using bi-planar X-rays: Application to the upper femoral extremity

Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing

Volumn 46, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 799-805

  Baudoin, Aurelien ^a   Skalli, W ^a   de Guise, J A ^b   Mitton, David ^a  

^a LABORATOIRE DE BIOMÉCANIQUE   (France)

^b CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

3D reconstruction; Biplanar X rays; Femur; Low dose X ray; Model customization

Indexed keywords

CARTILAGE; ERROR ANALYSIS; FINANCIAL DATA PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; REPAIR; RESTORATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

3-D RECONSTRUCTIONS; BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL (CI); CT SCANNING; GEOMETRIC MODELLING; IN-VITRO; IN-VIVO; INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION; LOW DOSE; MEAN ERROR (ME); OBSERVER (OBS); PRIORI KNOWLEDGE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SUBJECT SPECIFIC;

THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIPLANAR X RAY; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR EPIPHYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PARAMETRIC TEST; RADIATION DOSE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; X RAY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALGORITHMS; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 48749111607     PISSN: 01400118     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-008-0353-8     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Mahfouz MR et al (2003) A robust method for registration of three-dimensional knee implant models to two-dimensional fluoroscopy images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22(12):1561-1574
2. Sato T, Koga Y, Omori G. (2004) Three-dimensional lower extremity alignment assessment system: Application to evaluation of component position after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19(5):620-628
3. Hagio K et al (2004) A novel system of four-dimensional motion analysis after total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 22(3):665-670
4. Otake Y et al (2005) Four-dimensional model of the lower extremity after total hip arthroplasty. J Biomech 38(12):2397-2405
5. Bousson V et al (2006) Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: Relationships linking geometric and densitometric variables to bone strength. Role for compact bone. Osteoporos Int 17(6):855-864
6. Van Sint Jan S et al (2006) Low-dose computed tomography: A solution for in vivo medical imaging and accurate patient-specific 3D bone modeling? Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 21(9):992-998
7. Gautsch TL, Johnson EE, Seeger LL (1994) True three dimensional stereographic display of 3D reconstructed CT scans of the pelvis and acetabulum. Clin Orthop Relat Res 305:138-151
8. Mortele KJ, McTavish J, Ros PR (2002) Current techniques of computed tomography. Helical CT, multidetector CT, and 3D reconstruction. Clin Liver Dis 6(1):29-52
9. Kalifa G et al (1998) Evaluation of a new low-dose digital x-ray device: first dosimetric and clinical results in children. Pediatr Radiol 28(7):557-561
10. Dubousset J et al (2005) A new 2D and 3D imaging approach to musculoskeletal physiology and pathology with low-dose radiation and the standing position: The EOS system. Bull Acad Natl Med 189(2):287-297 (discussion 297-300)
11. Fleute M, Lavallee S, Julliard R (1999) Incorporating a statistically based shape model into a system for computer-assisted anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Med Image Anal 3(3):209-222
12. Laporte S et al (2003) A biplanar reconstruction method based on 2D and 3D contours: Application to the distal femur. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 6(1):1-6
13. Pomero V et al (2004) Fast accurate stereoradiographic 3D-reconstruction of the spine using a combined geometric and statistic model. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 19(3):240-247
14. Benameur S et al (2003) 3D/2D registration and segmentation of scoliotic vertebrae using statistical models. Comput Med Imaging Graph 27(5):321-337
15. Benameur S et al (2002) 3D biplanar statistical reconstruction of scoliotic vertebrae. Stud Health Technol Inform 91:281-285
16. Mitton D et al (2006) 3D reconstruction of the pelvis from bi-planar radiography. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 9(1):1-5
17. Le Bras A et al (2004) 3D reconstruction of the proximal femur with low-dose digital stereoradiography. Comput Aided Surg 9(3):51-57
18. Pomero V et al. (2003) Procede d'imagerie radiographique pour la reconstruction tridimensionnelle, dispositif et programme d'ordinateur pour mettre en œuvre ce procede Radiographic imaging method for three-dimensional reconstruction, device and computer software for carrying out said method
19. Mitton D et al (2000) 3D reconstruction method from biplanar radiography using non-stereocorresponding points and elastic deformable meshes. Med Biol Eng Comput 38(2):133-139
20. Mitulescu A et al (2001) Validation of the non-stereo corresponding points stereoradiographic 3D reconstruction technique. Med Biol Eng Comput 39(2):152-158