Three-dimensional lower extremity alignment assessment system: Application to evaluation of component position after total knee arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 620-628

  Sato, Takashi ^a   Koga, Yoshio ^a   Omori, Go ^b  

^a Niigata Kobari Hospital   (Japan)

^b NIIGATA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

biplanar radiography; component alignment; computed radiography; lower limb alignment; total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; KNEE; KNEE FUNCTION; RELIABILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VALGUS DEFORMITY; VARUS DEFORMITY;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE MALALIGNMENT; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KNEE JOINT; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 3342971028     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2003.12.063     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Figgie H.E. 3rd, Goldberg V.M., Figgie M.P., et al. The effect of alignment of the implant on fractures of the patella after condylar total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 71:1989;1031
2. Windsor R.E., Scuderi G.R., Moran M.C., et al. Mechanisms of failure of the femoral and tibial components in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 248:1989;15
3. Liau J.J., Cheng C.K., Huang C.H., et al. The effect of malalignment on stresses in polyethylene component of total knee prostheses-a finite element analysis. Clin Biomech. 17:2002;140
4. Matsuda S., Miura H., Nagamine R., et al. Effect of femoral and tibial component position on patellar tracking following total knee arthroplasty 10-year follow-up of Miller-Galante I knees. Am J Knee Surg. 14:2001;152
5. Singerman R., Pagan H.D., Peyser A.B., et al. Effect of femoral component rotation and patellar design on patellar forces. Clin Orthop. 334:1997;345
6. Singerman R., Heiple K.G., Davy D.T., et al. Effect of tibial component position on patellar strain following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 10:1995;651
7. Nagamine R., White S.E., McCarthy D.S., et al. Effect of rotational malposition of the femoral component on knee stability kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 10:1995;265
8. Ranawat C.S., Boachie-Adjei O. Survivorship analysis and results of total condylar knee arthroplasty 8- to 11-year follow-up period. Clin Orthop. 226:1988;6
9. Schneider R., Abenavoli A.M., Soudry M., Insall J. Failure of total condylar knee replacement correlation of radiographic, clinical, and surgical findings. Radiology. 152:1984;309
10. Ritter M.A., Faris P.M., Keating E.M., Meding J.B. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop. 299:1994;153
11. Ewald F.C. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop. 248:1989;9
12. Kelly M.A., Clarke H.D. Long-term results of posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 404:2002;51
13. Keating E.M., Meding J.B., Faris P.M., et al. Long-term followup of nonmodular total knee replacements. Clin Orthop. 404:2002;34
14. Indelli P.F., Aglietti P., Buzzi R., et al. The Insall-Burstein II prosthesis a 5- to 9-year follow-up study in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty. 17:2002;544
15. Laskin R.S. The Genesis total knee prosthesis a 10-year followup study. Clin Orthop. 388:2001;95
16. Pavone V., Boettner F., Fickert S., et al. Total condylar knee arthroplasty a long-term followup. Clin Orthop. 388:2001;18
17. Gill G.S., Joshi A.B., Mills D.M. Total condylar knee arthroplasty 16- to 21-year results. Clin Orthop. 367:1999;210
18. Weber A.B., Worland R.L., Keenan J., et al. A study of polyethylene and modularity issues in >1,000 posterior cruciate-retaining knees at 5 to 11 years. J Arthroplasty. 17:2002;987
19. Kelly M.A. Patellofemoral complications following total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 50:2001;403
20. Schneider R., Abenavoli A.M., Soudry M., et al. Failure of total condylar knee replacement Correlation of radiographic, clinical, and surgical findings. Radiology. 152:1984;309
21. Lonner J.H., Laird M.T., Stuchin S.A. Effect of rotation and knee flexion on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop. 331:1996;102
22. Petersen T.L., Engh G.A. Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 3:1988;67
23. Rhoads D.D., Nobles P.C., Reuben J.D., et al. The effect of femoral component position on patellar tracking after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 260:1990;43
24. Burr D.B., Cook L.T., Cilento E.V., et al. A method for radiographically measuring true femoral rotation. Clin Orthop. 167:1982;139
25. Berger R.A., Rubash H.R., Seel M.J., et al. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using thet epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop. 286:1993;40
26. Olcott C.W., Scott R.D. Femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 367:1999;39
27. Arima J., Whiteside L.A., McCarthy D.S., et al. Femoral rotational alignment, based on the anteroposterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee A technical note. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 77:1995;1331
28. DiGioia A.M. III, Jaramaz B. Computer-assisted tools and interventional technologies. Lancet. 354:1999;SIV46
29. DiGioia A.M. 3rd, Jaramaz B., Colgan B.D. Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery. Image guided and robotic assistive technologies. Clin Orthop. 354:1998;8