Automatic activation of spatial-numerical association in a primed parity judgement task: Evidence from the number-line congruency effect

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 847-866

  Tse, Chi Shing ^a,b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; PARITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 48749108247     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: 14640635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440701577426     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bodner, G. E., & Dypvik, A. T. (2005). Masked priming of number judgments depends on prime validity and task. Memory and Cognition, 33, 29-47.
2. Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. J. (2001). Prime validity affects masked repetition priming: Evidence for an episodic resource account of priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 616-647.
3. Caessens, B., Hommel, B., Reynvoet, B., & van der Goten, K. (2004). Backward-compatibility effects with irrelevant stimulus-response overlap: The case of the SNARC effect. Journal of General Psychology, 131, 411-425.
4. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396.
5. Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 626-641.
6. Fias, W. (2001). Two routes for the processing of verbal numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Psychological Research, 65, 250-259.
7. Fias, W., Brysbaert, M., Geypens, F., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 95-110.
8. Fias, W., Lauwereyns, J., & Lammertyn, J. (2001). Irrelevant digits affect feature-based attention depending on the overlap of neural circuits. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 415-423.
9. Fischer, M. H. (2003). Spatial representations in number processing: Evidence from a pointing task. Visual Cognition, 10, 493-508.
10. Fischer, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 555-556.
11. Gevers, W., Caessens, B., & Fias, W. (2005). Towards a common processing architecture underlying Simon and SNARC effects. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 659-673.
12. Gevers, W., Ratinckx, E., de Baene, W., & Fias, W. (2006). Further evidence that the SNARC effect is processed along a dual-route architecture: Evidence from the lateralised readiness potential. Experimental Psychology, 53, 58-68.
13. Gevers, W., Verguts, T., Reynovet, B., Caessens, B., & Fias, W. (2006). Numbers and space: A computational model of the SNARC effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 32-44.
14. Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (Eds.). (1997). Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
15. Ito, Y., & Hatta, T. (2004). Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Memory and Cognition, 32, 662-673.
16. Keus, I. M., Jenks, K. M., & Schwarz, W. (2005). Psychophysiological evidence that the SNARC effect has its functional locus in a response selection stage. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 48-56.
17. Keus, I. M., & Schwarz, W. (2005). Searching for the functional locus of the SNARC effect: Evidence for a response-related origin. Memory and Cognition, 33, 681-695.
18. Lorch, R. F., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 149-157.
19. Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgments of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519-1520.
20. Naccache, L., & Dehaene, S. (2001). Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli. Cognition, 80, 215-229.
21. Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
22. Nuerk, H.-C., Wood, G., & Willmes, K. (2005). The Universal SNARC effect: The association between number magnitude and space is amodal. Experimental Psychology, 52, 187-194.
23. Reynvoet, B., & Brysbaert, M. (1999). Single-digit and two-digit Arabic numerals address the same semantic number line. Cognition, 72, 191-201.
24. Reynvoet, B., Brysbaert, M., & Fias, W. (2002b). Semantic priming in number naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1127-1139.
25. Reynvoet, B., Caessens, B., & Brysbaert, M. (2002a). Automatic stimulus-response associations may be semantically mediated. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 107-112.
26. Zebian, S. (2005). Linkages between number concepts, spatial thinking, and directionality of writing: The SNARC effect and the REVERSE SNARC effect in English and Arabic monoliterates, biliterates, and illiterate Arabic speakers. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 5, 165-190.