Towards a common processing architecture underlying Simon and SNARC effects

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 659-673

  Gevers, Wim ^a   Caessens, Bernie ^a   Fias, Wim ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONFLICT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 26244461686     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: 14640635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440540000112     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ansorge, U. (2003). Influences of response-activating stimuli and passage of time on the Simon effect. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 67(3), 174-183.
2. Ansorge, U., & Wühr, P. (2004). A response discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(2), 365-377.
3. Beringer, J. (1995). Experimental Run Time System (Version 3.11). Frankfurt, Germany: Berisoft Corporation.
4. Caessens, B., Hommel, B., Reynvoet, B., & van der Goten, K. (2004). Backward compatibility with irrelevant SR-mappings: The case of the SNARC-effect. Journal of General Psychology, 131(4), 411-425.
5. Dehaene, S. (1996). The organisation of brain activations in number comparison: Event-related potentials and the additive-factors method. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(1), 47-68.
6. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396.
7. Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(3), 626-641.
8. De Jong, R., Liang, C. C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
9. Eimer, M. (1999). Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioral performance. Acta Psychologica, 101, 293-314.
10. Fias, W., Brysbaert, M., Geypens, F., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 95-110.
11. Fias, W., & Fischer, M. H. (2005). Spatial representation of numbers. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 43-54). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
12. Fias, W., Lauwereyns, J., & Lammertyn, J. (2001). Irrelevant digits affect feature-based attention depending on the overlap of neural circuits. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 415-423.
13. Fischer, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6(6), 555-556.
14. Gevers, W., & Lammertyn, J. (2005). The hunt for SNARC. Psychology Science, 47, 10-21.
15. Gevers, W., Ratinckx, E., De Baene, W., & Fias, W. (2005). Implicit number-space links activate spatial responses: Evidence from the LRP. Manuscript submitted for publication.
16. Hommel, B. (1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 55, 280-290.
17. Hommel, B. (1997). Interactions between stimulus-stimulus congruence and stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Research, 59, 248-260.
18. Keus, I. M., & Schwarz, W. (in press). Searching for the functional locus of the SNARC effect: Evidence for a response related origin. Memory and Cognition.
19. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
20. Kornblum, S., Stevens, G., Whipple, A., & Requin, J. (1999). The effects of irrelevant stimuli: 1. The time-course of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(3), 688-714.
21. Lammertyn, J., Fias, W., & Lauwereyns, J. (2002). Semantic influences on feature-based attention due to overlap of neural circuits. Cortex, 38, 878-882.
22. Lu, C. H., & Proctor, R. W. (1994). Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 286-298.
23. Mapelli, D., Rusconi, E., & Umiltà, C. (2003). The SNARC effect: An instance of the Simon effect? Cognition, 88(3), B1-B10.
24. Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (Eds.). (1990). Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
25. Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446-461.
26. Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002). Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Attention and performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action (pp. 494-519). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27. Ridderinkhof, K. R., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Wijnen, J., & Burle, B. (2004). Response inhibition in conflict tasks is revealed in delta plots. In M. Posner (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of attention. New York: Guilford Press.
28. Ridderinkhof, K. R., van der Molen, M. W., & Bashore, T. R. (1995). Limits on the application of additive factors logic: Violations of stage robustness suggest a dual-process architecture to explain flanker effects on target processing. Acta Psychologica, 89, 315-334.
29. Sanders, A. F. (1990). Stage analysis of reaction processes. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behaviour (pp. 331-354). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
30. Simon, J. R. (1969). Reaction toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 1974-1976.
31. Simon, J. R., Acosta, E., Medwaldt, S. P., & Speidel, C. R. (1976). The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on choice reaction time: Duration of the phenomenon and its relation to stages of processing. Perception and Psychophysics, 19, 16-22.
32. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extension on Donder's method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
33. Also available in Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
34. Stürmer, B., Seiss, E., & Leuthold, H. (2005). Executive control in the Simon task: A dual-task examination of response priming and its suppression. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17(5), 590-618.
35. Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., Umiltà, C., & Bassignani, F. (2000). The role of long-term and short-term memory links in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(2), 648-670.
36. Tlauka, M. (2002). The processing of numbers in choice-reaction tasks. Australian Journal of Psychology, 54(2), 94-98.