Communication through the Artefact by Means of Synchronous Co-construction

ICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings

Volumn 2, Issue , 2006, Pages 825-831

  Wichmann, Astrid ^a   Kuhn, Markus ^a   Hoppe, Ulrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CO-CONSTRUCTION; DOMAIN SPECIFIC; INFORMAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; LEARNING SCENARIOS; MODELLING ENVIRONMENT; MODELLING PROCESS; SUBJECT MATTERS; SYNCHRONOUS LEARNING;

CURRICULA; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; TOOLS; VISUAL LANGUAGES;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

EID: 48749105137     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Baber, C. (2005). Evaluation in Human Computer Interaction. Evaluation of Human Work: A Practical Ergonomics Methodology, 3rd Edition. London: Taylor and Francis
2. Dix, A. J., and Finaly., J. E., Abowd, G. D., & Beale, R. (1997). Human-computer interaction. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Grudin, J. (1988), Why CSCW Applications Fail: Problems in the Design and Evaluation of Organizational Interfaces, in Proceedings of ACM CSCW'88 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Perspectives on Evaluation, pp. 85-93.
4. Hoeksema, K., Jansen, M., Hoppe H. U (2004). Interactive Processing of Astronomical Observations In a Cooperative Modelling Environment. In: Kinshuk, Chee-Kit Looi, Erkki Sutinen e.a. (eds). Proceedings of the 4th EEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2004, Joensuu, Finland, pp. 888-889
5. Hoppe, H. U., Pinkwart, N., Oelinger, M., Zeini, S., Verdejo, F., Barros, B., & Mayorga, J. I. (2005). Building Bridges within Learning Communities through Ontologies and "Thematic Objects,". In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. Mahwah (NJ), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 211-220.
6. Hoppe, H.U. (2004). Collaborative mind tools. In Tokoro, M. & Steels, L. (eds.): The Future of Learning. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
7. Jonassen, D.H. (2000). Computers as Mindtools for Schools: Engaging Critical Thinking. Columbus, OH: Prentice-Hall.
8. Jong, T., de & Joolingen, W.R. van (1998). Discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68, 179-201
9. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P. and Sweller, J. (1998). Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human Factors, 40(1), 1-17.
10. Kuhn, M., Hoppe H. U., Lingnau A., Wichmann (2005): Computational Modelling and Simulation Fostering New Approaches in Learning Probability. Innovations in Education and Training International Journal (IETI)
11. Painter, S. (2001). Issues in the observation and evaluation of technology integration in K-12 classrooms. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21-25.
12. Pinkwart, N. (2003). A Plug-In Architecture for Graph Based Collaborative Modeling Systems. In U. Hoppe, F. Verdejo & J. Kay (eds.): Shaping the Future of Learning through Intelligent Technologies. Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 535-536. Amsterdam, IOS Press.
13. Pinkwart, N., Malzahn, N., Westheide, D., & Hoppe, H. U. (2005). Community Support Based on Thematic Objects and Similarity Search. In L. Aroyo & D. Dicheva (Eds.), Workshop proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia (p. 57-60). Amsterdam (The Netherlands), University of Amsterdam.
14. Project COLDEX (Collaborative Learning and Distributed Experimentation). Download from http://www.coldex.info
15. Reiser, B.J., Tabak, I., Sandoval, W.A., and Smith., B. K., Steinmuller, F., & Leone, A.J. (2001). BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry In biology classrooms In Carver, S.M. & Klahr, D. (Eds.), Cognition and Instruction: Twenty-five Years of Progress: 263-305. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load of a learners' mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 5-13.