Carotid stenosis in high risk patients. The SAPPHIRE study versus a decision analysis. Which is the best therapeutic option?;Estenosis carotídea en enfermos de alto riesgo. Estudio SAPPHIRE frente a un análisis de decisión. ¿Cuál es la mejor opción terapéutica?

Revista de Neurologia

Volumn 40, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 449-452

  Arrebola Lopez M ^a   Hernandez Osma E ^a   Gomez Moya B ^a   Rodriguez Espinosa N ^a   Panella Agusti F ^a   Admetller Castiglione, X ^a   Garcia Vidal R ^a   Martin Paredero V ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARI JOAN XXIII   (Spain)

Author keywords

Carotid endarterectomy; Carotid stent; High risk patient; SAPPHIRE study

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CAROTID ARTERY SURGERY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUALITY OF LIFE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; ANGIOPLASTY; CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; STENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOPLASTY; CAROTID STENOSIS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; ENDARTERECTOMY, CAROTID; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 24644482722     PISSN: 02100010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.33588/rn.4008.2004493     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 445-53.
2. European Carotid Surgery Trialist' Collaborative Group: MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe carotid stenosis. Lancet 1991; 337: 1235-43.
3. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 1995; 273: 1421-8.
4. Diethrich EB, Ndiaye M, Reid DB. Stenting in the carotid artery: initial experience in 110 patients. J Endovasc Surg 1996; 3: 42-62.
5. Wholey MH, Jarmolowski CR, Eles G, Levy D, Buecthel J. Endovascular stents for carotid artery occlusive disease. J Endovasc Surg 1997; 4: 326-38.
6. Roubin GS, New G, Iyer SS, Vitek JJ, Al-Mubarak N, Liu MW, et al. Immediate and late clinical outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a 5-year prospective analysis. Circulation 2001; 103: 532-7.
7. Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial. Lancet 2001; 357: 1729-37.
8. Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, Fayad P, Katzen BT, Mishkel GJ, et al. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 1493-501.
9. Ouriel K, Hertzer NR, Beven EG, O'hara PJ, Krajewski LP, Clair DG, et al. Preprocedural risk stratification: identifying an appropriate population for carotid stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2001; 33: 728-32.
10. Gasparis AP, Ricotta L, Cuadra SA, Char DJ, Purtill WA, Van Bemmelen PS, et al. High-risk carotid endarterectomy: fact or fiction. J Vasc Surg. 2003; 37: 40-6.
11. Martín-Conejero A, Reina-Gutiérrez T, Serrano-Hernando FJ, Ponce-Cano A, Vega de Céniga M, Blanco-Cañibano E, et al. Cirugía carotídea en pacientes de alto riesgo (no NASCET). ¿Está justificado un tratamiento alternativo? Angiología 2004; 56: 87-95.
12. Reina-Gutiérrez T, Arribas-Díaz A, Masegosa-Medina A, Porto-Rodríguez J, Serrano-Hernando FJ. Control de calidad en cirugía carotídea. Resultados del registro de cirugía carotídea en Región Centro de España (1999-2000). Rev Neurol 2003; 36: 9-14.