A political base of a polyphonic debate

Critical Perspectives on Accounting

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 894-900

  Dillard, Jesse ^a  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic accounting research; Critical accounting; Polyphonic

Indexed keywords

EID: 48549106511     PISSN: 10452354     EISSN: 10959955     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2007.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ahern T, Becker A, Burns J, Chapman C, Granlund M, Habersam M, et al. The future of interpretive accounting research - a polyphonic debate. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. [in press].
2. Armstrong P. The influence of Michel Foucault on accounting research. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 5 1 (1994) 25-56
3. Bricker R. An empirical investigation of the structure of accounting research. Journal of Accounting Research 27 (1989) 246-262
4. Brown L.D. 1996. Influential Accounting Articles, Individuals, Ph.D. Granting institutions and faculties: a citation analysis, Accounting Organizations and Society, 21:723-754.
5. Bryer R. A Marxist critique of the FASBs conceptual framework. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 10 5 (1999) 551-590
6. Bryer R. Marx and accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 10 5 (1999) 683-709
7. Chua W. Teaching and learning only the language of monolingualism in a multilingual world. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 7 (1996) 129-156
8. Clarke F., Craig R., and Amernic J. Theatre and intolerance in financial accounting research. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 10 1 (1999) 65-88
9. Deegan C, Soltys S. Social accounting research: An Australasian perspective. Accounting Forum. [in press].
10. Demski JS., Dopuch N., Lev B., Ronen J., Searfoss G., Sunder S. 1991. A statement on the state of academic accounting. Statement to the Research Director of the American Accounting Association.
11. Everett J., and Neu D. Ecological modernization and the limits of environmental accounting. Accounting Forum 24 1 (2000) 5-30
12. Fogarty T. Sponsored academic positions by large public accounting firms: an investigation of Quid Pro Quo. Advances in Public Interest Accounting 6 (1996) 133-162
13. Fogarty T., and Ruhl J. The stratification of academic accounting in the US: the role of doctoral funding awards. Critical Perspective in Accounting 7 (1996) 509-528
14. Gray R. The social accounting project and Accounting, Organizations and Society: Privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique?. Accounting, Organizations and Society 27 (2002) 687-709
15. Grey C. Debating foucault: a critical reply to Neimark. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 5 1 (1994) 5-24
16. Heck J, Jensen B. 2006. An analysis of the contributions of the accounting review across 80 years: 1926-2005. Working paper, Villanova University available at: http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/395wpTAR/Web/TAR395wp.
17. Hoskin K. Boxing clever: For, against and beyond Foucault in the battle for accounting theory. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 5 1 (1994) 57-86
18. Lee T. Shaping the US Academic Accounting Research Profession: The American Accounting Association and the Social Construction of a Professional Elite. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 6 (1995) 241-261
19. Lee T. The editorial gatekeeper of the accounting academy. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal (1997) 11-30
20. Lee T. Anatomy of a professional elite: The Executive Committee of the American Accounting Association 1916-1996. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 10 (1999) 247-264
21. Lee T., and Williams P. Accounting from the inside: legitimating the accounting academic elite. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 10 (1999) 867-895
22. Lehman G. A legitimate concern for environmental accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 6 6 (1995) 393-412
23. Lehman G. Disclosing new worlds: a role for social and environmental accounting and auditing. Accounting, Organizations and Society 24 3 (1999) 217-242
24. Lehman G. Reclaiming the public sphere: problems and prospects for corporate social and environmental accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 12 (2001) 713-733
25. Lukka K., and Kasanen E. Is accounting a global or a local discipline? evidence from major research journals. Accounting, Organizations and Society 21 7/8 (1996) 755-773
26. Macve R. Capital and financial accounting: A commentary of Bryer's "A Marxist critique of the FASB's conceptual framework". Critical Perspectives on Accounting 10 5 (1999) 591-614
27. Neimark M. The king is dead. Long live the king!. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 1 1 (1990) 103-114
28. Neimark M. Regicide revisited: Marx, Foucault and accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 5 1 (1994) 87-108
29. Reiter S., and Williams P. The structure and progressivity of accounting research and the production of knowledge. Accounting, Organizations and Society 27 (2002) 575-607
30. Robson K. Social analyses of accounting institutions: Economic value, accounting representation and the conceptual framework. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 10 5 (1999) 615-630
31. Roslender R., and Dillard J. Reflections on the interdisciplinary perspectives on accounting project. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 14 3 (2003) 325-352
32. Schwartz B., Williams S., and Williams P. US doctoral students' familiarity with accounting journals: insights into the structure of the U.S. Academy. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 16 3 (2005) 327-348
33. Smith K., and Labrand D. The role of editors' professional connection in determining which paper gets published: evidence from accounting research journals. Accounting Perspectives 1 (1995) 21-30
34. Stone D. Researching the revolution: prospects and possibilities for the Journal of Information Systems. Journal of Information Systems 16 1 (2002) 1-6
35. Tinker T. Mickey Marxism rides again. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 10 5 (1999) 643-670
36. Tinker T., and Gray R. Beyond critique of pure reason: From policy to policies to praxis in environmental and social accounting. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal 16 5 (2003) 727-761
37. Tinker T., Lehman C., and Neimark M. Falling down the hole in the middle of the road: political quietism in corporate social accounting. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal 4 2 (1991) 28-54
38. Tucker R. (Ed.), 1978. The Marx-Engels Reader 2nd edition. NY.
39. Tuttle B. Editor's Comments. Journal of Information Systems 19 2 (2005) 1-6
40. Tuttle B, Dillard J. forthcoming. Beyond competition: Institutional isomorphism in U.S. accounting research. Accounting Horizons.
41. Williams P. A descriptive analysis of authorship in the accounting review. Accounting Review (1985) 300-313
42. Williams P. Who gets to speak and what must they say? A commentary on the Briloff Affair. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 12 (2001) 213-219
43. Williams P., Jenkins J., and Ingraham L. The winnowing away of behavioral accounting research in the U.S.: the process for anointing accounting elites. Accounting, Organizations and Society 31 8 (2006) 783-818