The editorial gatekeepers of the accounting academy

Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 11-30

  Lee, Tom ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986139349     PISSN: 09513574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09513579710158694     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bamber, E.M. (1993), “Opportunities in behavioral accounting research”, Behavioral Research in Accounting, Vol. 5, pp. 1-29.
2. Bourdieu, P. (1988), Homo Academicus, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
3. Bricker, R. (1989), “An empirical investigation of the structure of accounting research”, Journal of Accounting Research, Autumn, pp. 246-262.
4. Brown, L.D. and Huefner, R.J. (1994), “The familiarity with and perceived quality of accounting journals: views of senior accounting faculty in leading US MBA programs”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Summer, pp. 223-250.
5. Campbell, T. L. and Hermanson, R. H. (1992), Doctoral progammes in Accounting, Irwin, Homewood, IL.
6. Crane, D. (1967), “The gatekeepers of science: some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journals, ” American Sociologist, November, pp. 195-201.
7. Cummings, L.L. and Frost, P.J. (1995), Publishing in the Organizational Sciences, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
8. Fogarty, T.J. and Saftner, D.V. (1993), “Academic department prestige: a new measure based on the doctoral student labor market”, Research in Higher Education, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 427-449.
9. Hagstrom, W.O. (1971), “Inputs, outputs, and the prestige of university science departments”, Sociology of Education, Fall, pp. 375-397.
10. Hasselback, J.R. (1995), Accounting Faculty Directory, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
11. Hasselback, J. R. and Reinstein, A. (1995a), “Assessing accounting doctoral programs by their graduates’ research productivity”, Advances in Accounting, Vol. 13, pp. 61-86.
12. Hasselback, J. R. and Reinstein, A. (1995b), “A proposal for measuring scholarly productivity of accounting faculty”, Issues in Accounting Education, Fall, pp. 269-306.
13. Heck, J.L., Derstine, R.P. and Huefer, R.J. (1992), Accounting Literature Index, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
14. Howard, T.P. and Nikolai, L.A. (1983), “Attitude measurement and perceptions of accounting faculty publication outlets”, The Accounting Review, October, pp. 765-776.
15. Hull, R. P. and Wright, G. B. (1990), “Faculty perceptions of journal quality: an update, ” Accounting Horizons, March, pp. 77-98.
16. Lafollette, M. C. (1992), Stealing into Print: Fraud, Plagiarism, and Misconduct in Scientific Publishing, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
17. Lee, T. A. (1995), “Shaping the US academic accounting research profession: the American Accounting Association and the social construction of a professional élite”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, June, pp. 241-261.
18. Moore, D. C. (1991), “Accounting on trial: the critical legal studies movement and its lessons for radical accounting”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 16 No. 8, pp. 763-792.
19. Mulkay, M. (1979), Science and the Sociology of Knowledge, George Allen & Unwin, London.
20. Neimark, M. K. (1994), “Regicide revisited: Marx, Foucault and accounting”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, March, pp. 87-108.
21. Puxty, A. G., Sikka, P. and Willmott, H. C. (1994), “Systems of surveillance and the silencing of UK academic accounting labour”, British Accounting Review, June, pp. 137-171.
22. Savan, B. (1988), Science under Siege: The Myth of Objectivity in Scientific Research, CBC Enterprises, Toronto.
23. Sikka, P., Willmott, H. and Puxty, T. (1995), “The mountains are still there: accounting academics and the bearings of intellectuals”, Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 113-140.
24. Sterling, R.R. (1990), “Positive accounting: an assessment”, Abacus, September, pp. 97-135.
25. Tinker, T. and Puxty, T. (1995), Policing Accounting Knowledge: The Market for Excuses Affair, Markus Weiner Publishers, Princeton, NJ.
26. Walker, M. (1987), “Positive accounting theory: a review”, British Accounting Review, December, pp. 305-312.
27. Whitley, R.D. (1984a), The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
28. Whitley, R.D. (1984b), “The scientific status of management research as a practically-orientated social science, ” Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 21 No. V, pp. 369-390.
29. Whitley, R.D. (1986), “The transformation of business finance into financial economics: the roles of academic expansion and changes in US capital markets”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 171-192.
30. Williams, P.F. and Rogers, J.L. (1995), “The Accounting Review and the production of accounting knowledge”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, June, pp. 263-287.
31. Zivney, T. L., Bertin, J. B. and Gavin, T. A. (1995), “A comprehensive examination of accounting faculty publishing, ” Issues in Accounting Education, Spring, pp. 1-25.