First- and second-order sensitivity equation methods for value and shape parameters

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 57, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1349-1370

  Ilinca, Florin ^a   Pelletier, D ^b   Hay, A ^c  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

^b ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Incompressible flows; Second order sensitivity; Sensitivity equations; Shape sensitivity; Three dimensional finite elements; Time dependent flows

Indexed keywords

AMPLIFICATION; CYLINDERS (SHAPES); FLUID DYNAMICS; FLUID MECHANICS; GALLIUM ALLOYS; SECONDARY EMISSION; THREE DIMENSIONAL; VORTEX SHEDDING;

FAST EVALUATION; FLOW PAST A CYLINDER; FLOW RESPONSES; GAP SIZE; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOWS; PARAMETER SPACES; SECOND ORDERS; SECOND-ORDER SENSITIVITY; SENSITIVITY EQUATION METHOD; SENSITIVITY EQUATIONS; SHAPE PARAMETERS; SHAPE SENSITIVITY; SMALL PERTURBATIONS; SOLUTION ALGORITHMS; THREE-DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENTS; TIME-DEPENDENT FLOWS; TRANSIENT FLOWS;

SOLUTIONS;

EID: 48549100285     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1744     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Yang RJ, Choi KK, Haug EJ. Numerical considerations in structural component shape optimization. Journal of Mechanisms Transmissions and Automation in Design 1985; 107(3):334-339.
2. Yang RJ, Choi KK. Accuracy of finite element based shape design sensitivity analysis. Journal of Structural Mechanics 1985; 13(2):223-239.
3. Ilinca F, Hay A, Pelletier D. Shape sensitivity analysis of unsteady laminar flow past a cylinder in ground proximity. Thirty-sixth AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, San Francisco, CA, June 2006; AIAA Paper 2006-3880.
4. Haug EJ, Choi K, Komkov V. Design Sensitivity Analysis of Structural Systems. Mathematics in Science and Engineering, vol. 177. Academic Press: Orlando, 1986.
5. Kleiber M, Antúnez H, Hien TD. Parametric Sensitivity in Nonlinear Mechanics. Wiley: New York, 1997.
6. Stanley LG, Stewart DL. Design Sensitivity Analysis: Computational Issues of Sensitivity Equation Methods. Frontiers in Applied Mathematics, vol. 25. SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, 2001.
7. Gunzburger MD. Perspectives in Flow Control and Optimization. SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, 2002.
8. Martins JRRA, Stradza P, Alonso JJ. The complex-step derivative approximation. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software - TOMS 2003; 29(3):245-262.
9. Lu S-Y, Sagaut P. Direct sensitivity analysis for smooth unsteady compressible flows using complex differentiation design. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2007; 53(12):1863-1886.
10. Putko M, Newman P, Taylor A, Green L. Approach for uncertainty propagation and robust design in CFD using sensitivity derivatives. Fifteenth AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Anaheim, CA, June 2001; AIAA Paper 2001-2528.
11. Borggaard J, Burns J. A PDE sensitivity equation method for optimal aerodynamic design. Journal of Computational Physics 1997; 136(2):366-384.
12. Turgeon É, Pelletier D, Borggaard J. A general continuous sensitivity equation formulation for complex flows. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B 2002; 42:485-498.
13. Lyness J-N, Moler CB. Numerical differentiation of analytic functions. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 1967; 4(2):202-210.
14. Griewank A. Evaluating Derivatives. SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, 2000.
15. Sherman LL, Taylor III AC, Green L, Newman PA, Hou GW, Korivi VM. First- and second-order aerodynamic sensitivity derivatives via automatic differentiation. Journal of Computational Physics 1996; 129(2):307-331.
16. Godfrey AG, Cliff EM. Direct calculation of aerodynamic force derivatives: A sensitivity-equation approach. Thirty-sixth AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 1998; AIAA Paper 98-0393.
17. Godfrey AG, Cliff EM. Sensitivity equations for turbulent flows. Thirty-ninth AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 2001; AIAA Paper 2001-1060.
18. Limache A. Aerodynamic modeling using computational fluid dynamics and sensitivity equations. Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 2000.
19. Turgeon É, Pelletier D, Borggaard J. Computation of airfoil flow derivatives using a continuous sensitivity equation method. Eighth CASI Aerodynamics Symposium, Toronto, Canada, April 2001.
20. Blackwell BF, Dowding KJ, Cochran RJ, Dobranich D. Utilization of sensitivity coefficients to guide the design of a thermal battery. Proceedings of the 1998 ASME/IMECE. ASME: Anaheim, CA, 1998; 73-82, HTD-Vol. 561-5.
21. Turgeon É, Borggaard J, Pelletier D. A continuous sensitivity equation approach to optimal design in mixed convection. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A 2000; 38:869-885.
22. Turgeon É, Pelletier D, Borggaard J. Applications of continuous sensitivity equations to flows with temperature-dependent properties. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications 2003; 44:611-624.
23. Turgeon É, Pelletier D, Borggaard J. A general continuous sensitivity equation formulation for the κ-ε model of turbulence. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics 2004; 18:29-46.
24. Ilinca F, Hétu J-F, Pelletier D. Three-dimensional simulation and design sensitivity analysis of the injection molding process. International Polymer Processing 2005; 20:86-92.
25. Hristova H, Étienne S, Pelletier D, Borggaard J. A continuous sensitivity equation method for time-dependent incompressible laminar flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2006; 50:817-844.
26. Ilinca F, Pelletier D, Borggaard J. A continuous second-order sensitivity equation method for time-dependent incompressible laminar flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2007; 55:565-587.
27. Ilinca F, Pelletier D. A continuous shape sensitivity equation method for unsteady laminar flows. ECCOMAS CFD 2006, European Congress on Computational Fluid Dynamics, Egmond aan Zee, The Netherlands, September 2006.
28. Roache PJ. Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering. Hermosa Publishers: Albuquerque, NM, 1998.
29. Sohankar A, Norberg C, Davidson L. Low-Reynolds-number flow around a square cylinder at incidence: study of blockage, onset of vortex shedding and outlet boundary condition. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1998; 26:39-56.
30. Williamson CHK. Defining a universal and continuous Strouhal-Reynolds number relationship for the laminar vortex shedding of a circular cylinder. Physics of Fluids 1988; 31:2742-2744.
31. Behr M, Hastreiter S, Mittal S, Tezduyar TE. Incompressible flow past a circular cylinder: dependence of the computed field on the location of the lateral boundaries. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1995; 123:309-316.