Direct sensitivity analysis for smooth unsteady compressible flows using complex differentiation

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 53, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 1863-1886

  Lu, Shang Yi ^a   Sagaut, Pierre ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Compressible flows; Numerical method; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

COMPRESSIBLE FLOW; DIFFERENTIATION (CALCULUS); NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SUBSONIC FLOW; TWO DIMENSIONAL;

KOVASZNAY'S DECOMPOSITION; SUBSONIC MIXING LAYER;

UNSTEADY FLOW;

COMPRESSIBLE FLOW; DIFFERENTIATION (CALCULUS); NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SUBSONIC FLOW; TWO DIMENSIONAL; UNSTEADY FLOW;

EID: 34247339664     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1386     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Walters RW, Huyse L. Uncertainty analysis for fluid mechanics with applications. ICASE Technical Report 2002-1, 2002.
2. Huerre P, Rossi M. Hydrodynamic instabilities in open flows. In Hydrodynamics and Nonlinear Instabilities, Godreche C, Manneville P (eds). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1998; 81-294.
3. Schmid PJ, Henningson DS. Stability and Transition in Shear Flows. Springer: New York, 2001.
4. Borggaard J, Burns J. A PDE sensitivity equation method for optimal aerodynamic design. Journal of Computational Physics 1997; 136:366-384.
5. Hristova H, Etienne S, Pelletier D, Borggaard J. A continuous sensitivity equation method for time dependent incompressible laminar flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2006; 50(7):817-844.
6. Sherman L, Taylor III AC, Green LG, Newman PA, Hou GW, Korivi VM. First- and second-order aerodynamic sensitivity derivatives via automatic differentiation with incremental iterative methods. Journal of Computational Physics 1996; 129:307-331.
7. Lyness JN, Moler CB. Numerical differentiation of analytic functions. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 1967; 4(2):202-210.
8. Anderson WK, Newman JC, Whitfield DL, Nielsen EJ. Sensitivity analysis of Navier-Stokes equations on unstructured meshes using complex variables. AIAA Journal 2001; 39(1):56-63.
9. Leclerc E, Sagaut P, Mohammadi B. On the use of incomplete sensitivities for feedback control of laminar vortex shedding. Computers and Fluids 2006; 35(10):1432-1443.
10. Squire W, Trapp G. Using complex variables to estimate derivatives of real functions. SIAM Review 1998; 40(1):110-112.
11. Lu SY, Sagaut P. Pseudo-characteristic formulation and dynamic boundary conditions for computational aeroacoustics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, in press.
12. Sesterhenn J. A characteristic-type formulation of the Navier-Stokes equations for high order upwind schemes. Computers and Fluids 2001; 30:37-67.
13. Zhuang M, Chen RF. Applications of higher-order optimized upwind schemes for computational aeroacoustics. AIAA Journal 2002; 40(3):443-449.
14. Shu CW, Osher S. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock capturing schemes II. Journal of Computational Physics 1989; 83:32-78.
15. Kovasznay LSG. Turbulence in supersonic flow. Journal of the Aeronautical Society 1953; 20(10):657-682.