The diagnostic value of chosen questionnaires (UDI 6SF, Gaudenz, MESA, ICIQ-SF and King's Health Questionnaire) in diagnosis of different types of women's urinary incontinence;Wartość diagnostyczna wybranych kwestionariuszy (UDI 6SF, Gaudenza, MESA, ICIQ-SF, oraz King's health Questionnaire) w rozpoznawaniu różnych postaci klinicznych nietrzymania moczu u kobiet

Ginekologia Polska

Volumn 79, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 338-341

  Pawel, Kieres ^a   Wojciech, Rokita ^a   Marta, Stanisławska ^a   Tomasz, Rechberger ^b   Mieczysław, Gałezia ^a  

^a Sw Rafała Wojewodzki Specjalistyczny Zespol Opieki Zdrowotnej Gruzlicy i Chorob Pluc ^*  (Poland)

^b Akademii Medycznej   (Poland)

Author keywords

Diagnostic procedures; Examination; Questionnaires; Urinary incontinence; Urodynamics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STRESS INCONTINENCE; URINE INCONTINENCE; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

ADULT; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MEDICAL HISTORY TAKING; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; URINARY INCONTINENCE; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 48549087004     PISSN: 00170011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Rechberger T, Skorupski P. Wprowadzenie. W: Nietrzymanie moczu u kobiet. Patologia, diagnostyka, leczenie. Pod red. Rechberger T, Jackowicki J. Lublin: Bifolium, 2005, 13-21
2. Espuma Pons M, Castro Diaz D, Carbonell C, [et al.] Comparison between the "ICIQ-UI Short Form" Questionnaire and the "King's Health Questionnaire" as assessment tools of urinary incontinence among women. Acts Urol Esp. 2007, 31, 502-510.
3. Cogan S, Weber A, Hammel J. Is urethral mobility really being assessed by the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system? Obstet Gynecol. 2002, 99, 479-476.
4. Corcos J, Gajewski J, Heritz D, [et al.]. Canadian Urological Association guidelines on urinary incontinence. Can J Urol. 2006, 13, 3127-3138.
5. Fauconnier A, Zareski E, Abichedid J, [et al.]. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging for grading pelvic organ prolapse according to the International Continence Society Classification: Which line should be used? Neurourol Urodyn. 2008, 27, 191-197.
6. Bengtson J, Versi E. Urogynecolgoy. In: Gynecology: principles and practice. Ed. Ryan K, Berkowitz R, Barbieri R. Mosby, St. Louis: Kistner's, 1995, 412-436.
7. Korda A, Krieger M, Hunter P, [et al.]. The value of clinical symptoms in the diagnosis of urinary incontinence in the female. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol. 1987, 27, 149-151.
8. Góes V, Sartori M, Baracat E, [et al.]. Urodynamic and clinical evaluation of post-menopausal women with stress urinary incontinence before and after cyclic estrogen therapy. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2003, 30, 103-106.
9. Klijer R, Spruch T. Przydatność wywiadu zbieranego za pomoca kwestionariusza dolegliwości urologicznych w ocenie zaburzeń dolnych dróg moczowych u kobiet. Ginekol Pol. 2001, 72, 127-133.
10. Fitzgerald M, Jaffar J, Brubaker L. Risk factors for an elevated postvoid residual urine volume in women with symptoms of urinary urgency, frequency and urge incontience. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001, 12, 237-239.
11. Spaczyński M, Radowicki S, Rechberger T [i wsp.]. Rekomendacje Polskiego Towarzystwa Ginekologicznego w sprawie diagnostyki i leczenia nietrzymania moczu u kobiet. Ginekol Pol. 2005, 76, 848-854.
12. Tamanini J, Dambros M, D;Ancona C, [et al.]. Concurrent validity, internal consistency and responsiveness of the Portuguese version of the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) in women after stress urinary incontinence surgery. Int Braz J Urol. 2004, 30, 479-486.
13. Contreras Ortiz O. Stress urinary incontinence in the gynecological practice. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004, 86, 6-16.