Is urethral mobility really being assessed by the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system?

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 99, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 473-476

  Cogan, Stephanie L ^a   Weber, Anne M ^a   Hammel, Jeffrey P ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; PARITY; PELVIC DISEASE; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; URETHRA; URINE INCONTINENCE; VAGINA;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PELVIC FLOOR; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; URETHRA; URINARY INCONTINENCE; UTERINE PROLAPSE;

EID: 0036191701     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01741-0     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Q-tip test in stress urinary incontinence
2. Q-tip test: A study of continent and incontinent women
3. The Q-tip test: Standardization of the technique and its interpretation in women with urinary incontinence
4. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction
5. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system
6. The Q-tip test and urethrovesical junction mobility
7. Visual assessment of urethrovesical junction mobility