ALOCOM: A generic content model for learning objects

International Journal on Digital Libraries

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 41-63

  Verbert, Katrien ^a   Duval, Erik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Content models; Interoperability; Ontologies; Reusability

Indexed keywords

EID: 48449093230     PISSN: 14325012     EISSN: 14321300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00799-008-0039-8     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL). http://www.adlnet.org (2007). Accessed 30 September 2007
2. Ballstaedt, S.-P.: Wissensvermittlung die Gestaltung von Lernmaterial. Weinheim, Beltz PsychologieVerslagsUnion (1997)
3. Barrit, C., Lewis, D., Wieseler, W.: CISCO Systems Reusable Information Object Strategy Version 3.0. Cisco Whitepaper. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/ 779/ibs/solutions/learning/whitepapers/el_cisco_rio.pdf (1999). Accessed 30 September 2007
4. Bechhofer, S., van Harmelen, F., Hendler, J.A., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D.L., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Stein, L.A., Dean, M., Schreiber, G. (eds.): OWL Web Ontology Language Reference, World Wide Web Consortium, Recommendation REC-owl-ref-20040210, February 2004
5. Brooks, J., Jesukiewicz, P.: SCORM reuse: current reality, challenges, and best practices. In: Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC), Florida, 4-7 December 2006
6. Buccella A., Cechic A., Brisaboa N.R.: An ontology approach to data integration. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 3(2), 62-68 (2003)
7. Cardinaels, K.: A dynamic learning object life and its implications for automatic metadata generation, xvi + 163 pp. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computer Science, K.U.Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, June 2007
8. Ceusters W., Bouquet L.: Language engineering and information mapping in pharmaceutical medicine. J. Belg. Med. Inform. Assoc. 7(1), 26-34 (2000)
9. Clark R.: Developing technical training: a structured approach for the development of classroom and computer-based instructional materials. Performance Technology Press, New York (1989)
10. Dick W., Cary L.: The systematic design of instruction, 3rd edn. Harper Collins, New York (1990)
11. Downes, S.: Learning objects: resources for distance education worldwide. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 2(1) (2001)
12. 1484.12.1 IEEE LTSC Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files/LOM_1484_12_1_v1_Final_Draft.pdf (2002)
13. Duval, E., Hodgins, W.: A LOM research agenda. In: Hencsey, G., White, B., Chen, Y., Kovacs, L., Lawrence, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 659-667 (2003)
14. ELI. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. http://www.educause.edu/eli (2007). Accessed 30 September 2007
15. Fernandes, E., Madhour, H., Miniaoui, S., Forte, M.W.: Phoenix Tool: A Support to Semantic Learning Model. Workshop on Applications of Semantic Web Technologies for e-Learning (SW-EL@ICALT'05), Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 5-8 July 2005
16. Gagne R.: The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. CBS College, New York (1985)
17. Horn R.: Structured writing at Twenty-five. Perform. Instr. 32, 11-17 (1993)
18. Horn R.E. (1998) Structured writing as a paradigm. In: Romiszowski A., Dills C. (eds). Instructional development: state of the art. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs
19. IMS-CP. IMS Content Packaging. Information Model, Best Practice and Implementation Guide, XML Binding Schemas, Version 1.1.4 Final Specification, IMS Global Consortium Inc. http://www.imsglobal.org/content/packaging (2007). Accessed 30 September 2007
20. IMS Learning Design (IMS LD) Specification. http://www.imsglobal.org/ learningdesign/ (2003)
21. ISO/IEC 21000-2:2005. Information technology: multimedia framework (MPEG-21) Part 2: Digital Item Declaration. http://standards.iso.org/ittf/ PubliclyAvailableStandards/c041112_ISO_IEC_21000-2_2005(E ).zip (2007). Accessed 30 September 2007
22. L'Allier, J.J.: Frame of reference: NETg's map to the products, their structure and core beliefs. NetG whitepaper. Cited in Polsani, Pithamber R. (2003) The Use and Abuse of Reusable Learning Objects. J. Digit. Inf. 3(4)
23. Lenski, W., Wette-Roch, E.: The TRIAL-SOLUTION approach to document re-use principles and realization. In: Proceedings of Electronic Media in Mathematics, Coimbra, 13-15 September 2001
24. Löser, A., Grune, C., Hoffmann, M.: A didactic model, definition of learning objects and selection of metadata for an online curriculum. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop of Interactive Computer Aided Learning (ICL), Villach, Austria 2002
25. Mager R.F.: Preparing instructional objectives, 2nd edn. David S. Lake, Belmont (1984)
26. Merrill, M.D.: Component display theory. In: Reigeluth, C.M. (eds.) Instructional design theories and models. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ (1983)
27. Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS). http://www.loc.gov/ standards/mets/mets-home.html (2007). Accessed 30 September 2007
28. Navy Integrated Learning Environment (Navy ILE) Introduction. https://ile-help.nko.navy.mil/ile/ (2007). Accessed 30 September 2007
29. Pazandak P., Srivastava J.: Evaluating object DBMSs for multimedia. IEEE Multimed. 4(3), 34-49 (1997)
30. ProLearn: Prolearn Network of Excellence on professional learning. http://www.prolearn-project.org/ (2007). Accessed 30 September 2007
31. Resource Aggregation Model for Learning, Education and Training (RAMLET). http://www.ieeeltsc.org/wg11CMI/ramlet/Pub/. Accessed 30 September 2007
32. Reusable Learning. http://www.reusablelearning.org (2007). Accessed 30 September 2007
33. Rey-López, M., Fernández-Vilas, A., Díaz-Redondo, R., Pazos-Arias, J.: Providing SCORM with adaptivity. In: Carr L, De Roure D, Arun Iyengar, Goble CA, Dahlin M (eds.) Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 981-982. ACM Press, New York (2006)
34. Robson, R.: Context and the role of standards in increasing the value of learning objects. In: McGreal R. (eds.) Online Education Using Learning Objects edited. University of Athabasca, Canada
35. Schluep S.: Modularization and Structured Markup for Web-based Learning Content in an Academic Environment. Shaker, Aachen (2005)
36. Schulmeister R.: Lernplattformen für das virtuelle Lernen. Evaluation und Didaktik, München (2003)
37. Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM): 2nd edn. http://www.adlnet.org (2004). Accessed 30 September 2007
38. Su X., Gulla J.A.: An information retrieval approach to ontology mapping. Data Knowl. Eng. 58(1), 47-69 (2006)
39. Süß, C., Kammerl, R., Freitag, B.: A teachware management framework for multiple teaching strategies. In: Bourdeau, J., Heller, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 12th ED-MEDIA 2000 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Montreal, QC, Canada, pp. 1101-1106, 26 June-1 July 2000
40. Tan, G.H.: Getting Started with Learning Objects. Publication incorporated into SeLF (Singapore e-Learning Framework). http://ole.tp.edu.sg/ courseware/teaching_guide/resources/article/gekhua/ Getting%20Started%20with%20LO.pdf (2002). Accessed 30 September 2007
41. Ullrich C.: The learning-resource-type is dead, long live the learning-resource-type!. Learn. Objects Learn. Des. 1(1), 7-15 (2005)
42. Verbert, K., Duval, E.: Towards a global architecture for learning objects: a comparative analysis of learning object content models. In: Cantoni, L., McLoughlin, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 16th ED-MEDIA 2004 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Lugano, Switzerland, pp. 202-209 (2004)
43. Verbert, K., Jovanovic, J., Gasevic, D., Duval, E.: Repurposing Learning object Components. In: Spyns, P., Duval, E., de Moor, A., Aroyo, L. (eds.) Proceedings of WOSE05: OTM 2005 Workshop on Ontologies, Semantics and E-Learning, Agia Napa, Cyprus, November 3 2005, pp. 1169-1178. Springer, Berlin (2005)
44. Wagner, E.D.: Steps to creating a content strategy for your organization. e-Learn. Dev. J. (2002)
45. Wiley, D.A.: Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: a definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. The instructional use of learning objects, Bloomington (2002)
46. Wiley, D.A.: The learning objects literature. http://opencontent.org/ blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/wiley-lo-review-final.pdf. Accessed 10 September 2007