Are moral reasons morally overriding?

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 369-388

  Portmore, Douglas W ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agent centered options; Imperfect reasons; Moral reasons; Morality; Nonmoral reasons; Overridingness; Rational options; Rationality; Supererogation

Indexed keywords

EID: 48449087715     PISSN: 13862820     EISSN: 15728447     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10677-008-9110-1     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bratman ME (1994) Kagan on 'The appeal to cost'. Ethics 104:325-332
2. Byron M (2005, April) Alternative consequentialisms. (Paper presented at Lingnan University, Hong Kong)
3. Chang R (2002) The possibility of parity. Ethics 112:659-688
4. Chang R (2004) Putting together morality and well-being. In: Baumann P, Betzler M (eds) Practical conflicts: new philosophical essays. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 118-158
5. Dreier J (2004) Why ethical satisficing makes sense and rational satisficing doesn't. In: Byron M (ed) Satisficing and maximizing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 131-154
6. Gert J (2003) Requiring and justifying: two dimensions of normative strength. Erkenntnis 59:5-36
7. Gert J (2004) Brute rationality: normativity and human action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
8. Gert J (2007) Normative strength and the balance of reasons. Philos Rev 116:533-562
9. Gert J (2008) Michael Smith and the rationality of immoral action. J Ethics 12:1-23
10. Hardwood S (1998) Eleven objections to utilitarianism. In: Pojman L (ed) Moral philosophy: a reader. Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis, pp 179-192
11. Kagan S (1989) The limits of morality. Clarendon Press, Oxford
12. Kagan S (1991) Replies to my critics. Philos Phenomenol Res 54:919-928
13. Kagan S (1994) Defending options. Ethics 104:348-351
14. Kawall J (2003) Self-regarding supererogatory actions. J Soc Philos 34:487-498
15. McLeod O (2001) Just plain 'ought'. J Ethics 5:269-291
16. Parfit D (2008) Climbing the mountain. Retrieved January 29, 2008, from http://individual.utoronto.ca/stafforini/parfit/parfit_-_climbing_the_mountain. pdf
17. Portmore DW (2003) Position-relative consequentialism, agent-centered options, and supererogation. Ethics 113:303-332
18. Portmore DW (2007) Consequentializing moral theories. Pac Philos Q 88:39-73
19. Portmore DW (2008a) Imperfect reasons. Retrieved January 24, 2008, from http://www.public.asu.edu/~dportmor/Imperfect_Reasons_and_Rational_Options.pdf
20. Portmore DW (2008b) Dual-ranking act-consequentialism. Philosophical Studies. DOI 10.1007/s11098-006-9059-7 (in press)
21. Postow B (2005) Supererogation again. J Value Inq 39:245-253
22. Raz J (1999) Engaging reason. Oxford University Press, Oxford
23. Sidgwick HE (1907) The method of ethics. Macmillan and Company, London
24. Slote M (1991) Shelly Kagan's the limits of morality. Philos Phenomenol Res 54:915-917
25. Sumner LW (1996) Welfare, happiness, and ethics. Oxford University, Oxford
26. Stroud S (1998) Moral overridingness and moral theory. Pac Philos Q 79:170-189
27. Taurek J (1977) Should the numbers count? Philos Public Aff 6:293-316
28. Vessel J-P (2008, March) Supererogation for utilitarianism. (Paper presented at the Pacific Division Meeting of the American Philosophical Association, Pasadena, CA)
29. Zimmerman MJ (1993) Supererogation and doing the best one can. Am Philos Q 30:373-80