Extraperitoneal standard laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 18, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 605-609

  Rozet, François ^a,b   Arroyo, Carlos ^a   Cathelineau, Xavier ^a   Barret, Eric ^a   Prapotnich, Dominique ^a   Vallancien, Guy ^a  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b INSTITUT MUTUALISTE MONTSOURIS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CANCER STAGING; CATHETERIZATION; CONTINENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HERNIOPLASTY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSCLE HEMATOMA; OPERATION DURATION; PENIS ERECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SURGICAL APPROACH; URINE RETENTION;

HUMANS; IMPOTENCE; INCIDENCE; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 4844226181     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2004.18.605     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial short-term experience. Urology 1997;50:854.
2. Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Barret E, et al. Prostatectomie radicale coelioscopique: Première évaluation après 28 interventions. Presse Med 1998;27:1570.
3. Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M, Roumeguere T, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Results after 50 cases. Eur Urol 2001;40:65.
4. Cathelineau X, Cahill D, Widmer H, et al. Transperitoneal or extraperitoneal approach for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A false debate over a real challenge. J Urol 2004;171:714.
5. Vallancien G, Guillonneau B, Fournier G, et al. Incontinence In: Vallancien G, Khoury S (eds): Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Technical Manual, ed 21. European School of Surgery Collection, 2002.
6. Vallancien G, Cathelineau X, Baumert H, et al. Complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery in urology: Review of 1,311 procedures at a single center. J Urol 2002;168:23.
7. Guilloneau B, Rozet F, Cathelineau X, et al. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The Montsouris 3-year experience. J Urol 2002;167:51.
8. Stolzenburg JU, Truss MC, Bekos A, et al. Does the extraperitoneal laparoscopic approach improve the outcome of radical prostatectomy? Curr Urol Rep 2004;5:115.
9. Hoznek A, Antiphon P, Borkowski T, et al. Assessment of surgical technique andperioperative morbidity associated with extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2003;61:617.
10. Abreu SC, Gill IS, Kaouk JH, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Comparison of transperitoneal vs extraperitoneal approach [abstract 76]. J Urol 2002;167(suppl):19.
11. Dubernard P, Benchetrit S, Chaffange P, et al. Prostatectomie extra-péritonéale retrograde laparoscopique (P.E.R.L.) technique simplifiée (à propos d'une série de 143 cas). Prog Urol 2003;13:163.
12. Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O. Heilbronn laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2001;40:54.
13. Begg CB, Riedel ER, Bach PB, et al. Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1138.