Does the extraperitoneal laparoscopic approach improve the outcome of radical prostatectomy?

Current Urology Reports

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 115-122

  Stolzenburg, Jens Uwe ^a   Truss, Michael C ^b   Bekos, Athanasios ^b   Do, Minh ^b   Rabenalt, Robert ^b   Stief, Christian G ^b   Hoznek, Andras ^b   Abbou, Clément Claude ^b   Neuhaus, Jochen ^b   Dorschner, Wolfgang ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy; Minimal Invasive Surgery; Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection; Radical Prostatectomy; Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PERITONEUM; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTATE TUMOR; PROSTATECTOMY; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; PERITONEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 4544228832     PISSN: 15272737     EISSN: 15346285     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11934-004-0023-9     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Dayman RV, Kavoussi LR: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology 1997, 50:854–857. DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00543-8
2. Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Barret E, et al.: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary evaluation after 28 interventions. Presse Med 1998, 27:1570–1574.
3. Vogeli TA, Burchardt M, Fornara P, et al.: Laparoscopic Working Group of the German Urological Association. Current laparoscopic practice patterns in urology: results of a survey among urologists in Germany and Switzerland. Eur Urol 2002, 42:441–446. DOI: 10.1016/S0302-2838(02)00399-8
4. Walsh PC: Anatomic radical prostatectomy. In Campbells Urology, vol 4, edn 8. Edited by Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, Wein AJ. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2002:3107–3129.
5. Raboy A, Ferzli G, Albert P: Initial experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 1997, 50:849–853. DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00485-8
6. Bollens R, Van den Bosche M, Roumeguere T, et al.: Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results after 50 cases. Eur Urol 2001, 40:65–69. DOI: 10.1159/000049750
7. Stolzenburg JU, Do M, Pfeiffer H, et al.: The endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): technique and initial experience. World J Urol 2002, 20:48–55. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-002-0265-4
8. Stolzenburg JU, Do M, Rabenalt R, et al.: Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): initial experience after 70 procedures. J Urol 2002, 169:2066–2071. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000067220.84015.8e
9. Stolzenburg JU, Truss MC: Technique of laparoscopic (endoscopic) radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2003, 91:749–757. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04206.x
10. Stolzenburg JU, Truss MC, Do M, et al.: Evolution of endoscopic Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy (EERPE): technical improvements and development of a nerve-sparing, potency-preserving approach. World J Urol 2003, 21:147–152. The authors describe the original technique of nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-003-0351-2
11. Türk I, Deger IS, Winkelmann B, et al.: Die laparoskopische radikale Prostatektomie: erfahrungen mit 145 eingriffen. Urologe A 2001, 40:199–206. DOI: 10.1007/s001200050463
12. Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, et al.: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases. J Urol 2001, 166:2101–2108. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65514-0
13. Guillonneau B, el-Fettouh H, Baumert H, et al.: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1000 cases at Montsouris Institute. J Urol 2003, 169:1261–1266. The latest update of the largest laparoscopic series worldwide. For the first time, the data match oncological results of similar large series with open prostatectomies. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000055141.36916.be
14. Hoznek A, Antiphon P, Borkowski T, et al.: Assessment of surgical technique and perioperative morbidity associated with extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2003, 61:617–622. The first study comparing the morbidity and surgical technique of the two main variants of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02415-9
15. Hara I, Kawabata G, Miyake H, et al.: Comparison of quality of life following laparoscopic and open prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 2003, 169:2045–2048. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000063961.99940.6c
16. Catalona WJ, Carvalhal GF, Mager DE, Smith DS: Potency, continence, and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 1999, 162:433–438. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68578-3
17. Guillonneau B, Rozet F, Barret E, et al.: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 240 procedures. Urol Clin North Am 2001, 28:189–202.
18. Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Doublet JD, et al.: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 550 procedures. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2002, 43:123–133.
19. Walsh PC: Anatomical radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol 1998, 160:2418–2424. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62202-X
20. Walsh PW, Donker PJ: Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 1982, 128:492–497.
21. Rassweiler J, Seemann O, Schulze M, et al.: Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J Urol 2003, 169:1689–1693. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000062614.56629.41
22. Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Doublet JD, Vallancien G: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the lessons learned. J Endourol 2001, 15:441–445. DOI: 10.1089/089277901300189510
23. Eden CG, Cahill D, Vass JA, et al.: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the initial UK series. BJU Int 2002, 90:876–882. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2002.03049.x
24. Dahl DM, L’Esperance JO, Trainer AF, et al.: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial 70 cases at a US university medical center. Urology 2002, 60:859–863. DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01953-2
25. Bishoff JT, Allaf ME, Kirkels W, et al.: Laparoscopic bowel injury: incidence and clinical presentation. J Urol 1999, 161:887–890. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)61797-X
26. Champault G, Cazacu F, Taffinder N: Serious trocar accidents in laparoscopic surgery: a French survey of 103,853 operations. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1996, 6:367–370. DOI: 10.1097/00019509-199610000-00006
27. Gill IS, Kerbl K, Meraney AM, Clayman RV: Basics of laparoscopic urologic surgery. In Campbells Urology vol 4, edn 8. Edited by Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, Wein AJ. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2002:3455–3505.
28. Pattaras JG, Moore RG, Landman J, et al.: Incidence of postoperative adhesion formation after transperitoneal genitourinary laparoscopic surgery. Urology 2002, 59:37–41. DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01474-1
29. Seifman B, Dunn R, Wolf JS: Transperitoneal laparoscopy in the previously operated abdomen: effect on operation time, length of stay, and complications. J Urol 2003, 169:36–40. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64029-3
30. Weibel MA, Majno G: Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery: a postmortem study. Am J Surg 1973, 126:345–353. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(73)80123-0
31. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris experience. J Urol 2000, 163:418–422. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67890-1
32. Gregori A, Simonato A, Lissiani A, et al.: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative complications in an initial and consecutive series of 80 cases [In process citation]. Eur Urol 2003, 44:190–194. DOI: 10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00261-6
33. Jacob F, Salomon L, Hoznek A, et al.: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary results. Eur Urol 2000, 37:615–620. DOI: 10.1159/000020202
34. Guillonneau B, Rozet F, Cathelineau X, et al.: Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris 3-year experience. J Urol 2002,167:51–56. The largest series of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy showing the possible complications of the technique. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65381-5
35. Guillonneau B, Gupta R, El Fettouh H, et al.: Laparoscopic [correction of laparoscopic] management of rectal injury during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2003, 169:1694–1696. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000059860.00022.07
36. Katz R, Borkowski T, Hoznek A, et al.: Operative management of rectal injuries during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2003, 62:310–313. DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00326-1
37. Augustin H, Hammerer P, Graefen M, et al.: Intraoperative and perioperative morbidity of contemporary radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1243 patients: results of a single center between 1999 and 2002. Eur Urol 2003, 43:113–118. DOI: 10.1016/S0302-2838(02)00495-5
38. Salomon L, Levrel O, de la Taille A, et al.: Radical prostatectomy by the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach: 12 years of experience in one center. Eur Urol 2002, 42:104–110. DOI: 10.1016/S0302-2838(02)00360-3
39. Fornara P, Doehn C, Seyfarth M, Jocham, D: Why is urological laparoscopy minimally invasive? Eur Urol 2000, 37:241–250. DOI: 10.1159/000052351
40. Nadu A, Salomon L, Hoznek A, et al.: Early removal of the catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2001, 166:1662–1664. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65648-0
41. Abreu SC, Gill I, Kaouk JH, et al.: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: comparison of transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal approach. J Urol 2002, 167:A76.
42. Schulman PG, Link RE: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 2000, 18:278–282. DOI: 10.1007/PL00007077