Inching forward on domestic violence: The 'co-ordinated community response' and putting it in practice in Cheshire

Journal of Gender Studies

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 185-199

  Hague, Gill ^a   Bridge, Sue ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b Cheshire Domestic Abuse Partnership   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Activism; Co ordinated community responses; Domestic violence; Empowerment; Multi agency

Indexed keywords

EID: 48349146058     PISSN: 09589236     EISSN: 14653869     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09589230802204134     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Allen, N., 2005. A multi-level analysis of co-ordinated community councils. American journal of community psychology, 35 (1/2), 49-63.
2. Allen, N., 2006. An examination of the effectiveness of domestic violence co-ordinating councils. Violence against women, 12 (1), 46.
3. Allen, N., Bybee, D. and Sullivan, C., 2004. Battered women's multitude of needs: evidence supporting the need for comprehensive advocacy. Violence against women, 10, 1-21.
4. Cheshire County Council, 2005. LPSA target 2005 [online]. Available from: www.cheshire.gov.uk
5. Cheshire Domestic Abuse Partnership (CDAP), 2003. Qualitative survey: consulting women service users [online]. Available from: www.cheshire.gov.uk/domesticabuse
6. Cheshire Domestic Abuse Partnership (CDAP), 2005a. Details of resources for primary and secondary schools [online]. Available from: www.cheshire.gov.uk/domesticabuse.
7. Cheshire Domestic Abuse Partnership (CDAP), 2005b. Making a difference: evaluation review of CDAP/Children Fund initiative [online]. Available from: www.cheshire.gov.uk/domesticabuse
8. Cheshire Domestic Abuse Partnership (CDAP), 2007. CDAP newsletter, February.
9. Clark, S., Burt, M., Schulte, M. and Maguire, K., 1996. Co-ordinating community responses to domestic violence in six communities: beyond the justice system. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, US Department of Health and Human Services.
10. Dobash, R. and Dobash, R., 1992. Women, violence and social change. London: RKP.
11. Douglas, N., Lilley, S., Kooper, L. and Diamond, A., 2004. Safety and justice: sharing personal information in the context of domestic violence - an overview. Home Office Development and Practice Report 30. London: Home Office.
12. Ellis, J., 2004. Preventing violence against women and girls: a study of educational programmes. London: Womankind.
13. Gamache, D. and Asmus, M., 1999. Enhancing networking among service provision. In: E. Pence and M. Shepard, eds. Co-ordinating community responses to domestic violence. London: Sage.
14. Hague, G., 2000. Home Office briefing notes. What works in reducing domestic violence: multi-agency fora. London: Home Office.
15. Hague, G., Kelly, L. and Mullender, A., 2001. Challenging violence against women: the Canadian experience. Bristol: The Policy Press.
16. Hague, G. and Malos, E., 2005. Domestic violence: action for change. 3rd ed. Cheltenham: New Clarion Press.
17. Hague, G., Malos, E. and Dear, W., 1996. Multi-agency work and domestic violence. Bristol: The Policy Press.
18. Hague, G., Mullender, A. and Aris, R., 2003. Is anyone listening? Accountability and women survivors of domestic violence. London: Routledge.
19. Hanmer, J. and Griffiths, S., 2001. Effective policing. In: J. Taylor-Browne, ed. What works in reducing domestic violence: a comprehensive guide for professionals. London: Whiting and Birch.
20. Harwin, N., Hague, G. and Malos, E., eds, 1999. The multi-agency approach to domestic violence: new opportunities, old challenges. London: Whiting and Birch.
21. Hester, M., Hanmer, J., Coulson, S., Morahan, M. and Razak, A., 2003. Domestic violence: making it through the criminal justice system. Sunderland: University of Sunderland and Northern Rock Foundation.
22. Hester, M. and Westmarland, N., 2005. Tackling domestic violence: effective interventions and approaches. Home Office Research Study 290. London: Home Office.
23. HM Government, 2004. Every child matters. London: HM Government. 24 Home Office, 1999. Multi-agency guidance for addressing domestic violence. London: Home Office.
24. Home Office, 2000a. Domestic violence: revised circular to the police, circular /2000. London: HMSO.
25. Home Office, 2000b. Home Office briefing notes. What works in reducing domestic violence. London: Home Office.
26. Home Office, 2003. Safety and justice: the government's proposals on domestic violence. London: Home Office.
27. Home Office, 2005. National delivery action plan [online]. London: Home Office. Available from: www.homeoffice.gov.uk.
28. Humphreys, C. and Holder, R., 2004. Presenting the evidence. Safe, 9, 10-12.
29. Humphreys, C. and Thiara, R., 2002. Routes to safety. Bristol: Women's Aid.
30. Mullender, A., Hague, G., Imam, A., Kelly, L., Malos, E. and Regan, L., 2002. Children's perspectives on domestic violence. London: Sage.
31. NSPCC, 2005. Teen abuse survey of Great Britain. Leicester: NSPCC.
32. Pence, E. and MacMahon, M., 1999. Duluth: a co-ordinated community responses to domestic violence. In: N. Harwin, G. Hague and E. Malos, eds. The multi-agency approach to domestic violence: new opportunities, old challenges. London: Whiting and Birch.
33. Pence, E. and Shepard, M., 1999. Co-ordinating community responses to domestic violence. London: Sage.
34. Robinson, L., 2005. The Cardiff women's safety unit: understanding the costs and consequences of domestic violence. Cardiff: Cardiff University.
35. Roussos, S. and Fawcett, S., 2000. A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for community health. American review of public health, 21, 369-402.
36. Walby, S., 2004. The cost of domestic violence. London: Women's and Equality Unit.