Battered women's multitude of needs: Evidence supporting the need for comprehensive advocacy

Violence Against Women

Volumn 10, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 1015-1035

  Allen, Nicole E ^a   Bybee, Deborah I ^b   Sullivan, Cris M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Advocacy; Coordinated community response; Domestic violence; Human service delivery; Intimate partner violence

Indexed keywords

EID: 4243153914     PISSN: 10778012     EISSN: 15528448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077801204267658     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Allen, N. E. (2001). Coordinating councils as a vehicle for achieving a coordinated community response to domestic violence: An examination of context-specific correlates of effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
2. Bell, M. E., & Goodman, L. A. (2001). Supporting battered women involved with the court system: An evaluation of a law school-based advocacy intervention. Violence Against Women, 7, 1377-1404.
3. Bui, H. N. (2003). Help-seeking behavior among battered immigrant women. Violence Against Women, 9, 207-239.
4. Bybee, D. I., & Sullivan, C. M. (2002). The process through which a strengths-based intervention resulted in positive change for battered women over time. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 103-132.
5. Clark, S. J., Burt, M. R., Schulte, M. M., & Maguire, K. (1996). Coordinated community responses to domestic violence in six communities: Beyond the justice system. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
6. Davidson, W. S., & Rappaport, J. (1978). Toward a model for advocacy: Values, roles, and conceptions from community psychology. In G. H. Weber & G. J. McCall (Eds.), Social scientists as advocates: Views from applied disciplines (pp. 67-97). Beverly Hills, CA: Russell Sage.
7. Davies, J. (2001). Building opportunities for battered women's safety and self-sufficiency (Practice paper developed by the National Resource Center on Domestic Violence for TANF and Child Support Enforcement agencies and domestic violence advocates). Retrieved February 17, 2003, from www.vawnet.org/vnl/ library/general/welpracl.htm
8. Davies, J., Lyon, E., & Monti-Catania, D. (1998). Safety planning with battered women: Complex lives/difficult choices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Dunst, C. J., Johanson, C., & Trivette, C. M. (1991). Family-oriented early intervention policies and practices: Family-centered or not. Exceptional Children, 58, 115-126.
10. Dunst, C. J., & Trivette, C. M. (1994). What is effective helping? In C. J. Dunst, C. M. Trivette, & A. G. Deal (Eds.), Supporting and strengthening families, Vol. 1: Methods, strategies and practices (pp. 162-170). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
11. Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Thompson, R. B. (1994). Supporting and strengthening family functioning: Toward a congruence between principle and practice. In C. J. Dunst, C. M. Trivette, & A. G. Deal (Eds.), Supporting and strengthening families, Vol. 1: Methods, strategies and practices (pp. 49-59). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
12. Dutton, M. A. (1992). Empowering and healing the battered woman: A model for assessment and intervention. New York: Springer.
13. Early, T. J., & GlenMaye, L. F. (2000). Valuing families: Social work practice with families from a strengths perspective. Social Work, 45, 118-130.
14. Fraser, M. W., & Galinsky, M. J. (1997). Toward a resilience-based model of practice. In M. W. Fraser (Ed.), Risk and resilience in childhood: An ecological perspective (pp. 265-275). Washington, DC: National Academy of Social Work Press.
15. Friedman, R. M. (1994). Restructuring of systems to emphasize prevention and family support. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 23, 40-47.
16. Gondolf, E. (1988). The survivor theory. In E. W. Gondolf & E. R. Fisher (Eds.), Battered women as survivors (pp. 11-25). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
17. Goodman, L., Bennett, L., & Dutton, M. A. (1999). Legal report: Obstacles to victims' cooperation with the criminal prosecution of their abusers: The role of social support. Violence and Victims, 14, 427-444.
18. Hart, B. J. (1995, March). Coordinated community approaches to domestic violence. Speech delivered at the Strategic Planning Workshop on Violence Against Women, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC. Retrieved February 17, 2003, from www.mincava.umn.edu/hart/nij.htm
19. Hutchison, I., & Hirschel, D. (1998). Abused women: Help-seeking strategies and police utilization. Violence Against Women, 4, 436-456.
20. Knitzer, J. (1982). Unclaimed children: The failure of public responsibility to children and adolescents in need of mental health services. Washington, DC: Children's Defense Fund.
21. Peled, E., & Edleson, J. L. (1994). Advocacy for battered women: A national survey. Journal of Family Violence, 9, 285-296.
22. Pence, E. (1999). Some thoughts on philosophy. In M. F. Shepard, & E. Pence (Eds.), Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: Lessons from Duluth and beyond (pp. 25-40). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Rapkin, B. D., & Luke, D. A. (1993). Cluster analysis in community research: Epistemology and practice. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 247-277.
24. Rhodes, N. R., & McKenzie, E. B. (1998). Why do battered women stay? Three decades of research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 3, 391-406.
25. Saleebey, D. (Ed.). (1997). The strengths perspective in social work practice (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
26. Schechter, S. (1999). New challenges for the battered women's movement: Building collaborations and improving public policy for poor women. Harrisburg, PA: National Resource Center on Domestic Violence.
27. Schneider, E. M. (2000). Battered women and feminist lawmaking. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28. Schorr, L. B. (1988). Within our reach: Breaking the cycle of disadvantage. New York: Doubleday.
29. Shepard, M., & Pence, E. (Eds.). (1999). Coordinated community response to domestic violence: Lessons from the Duluth model. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Sullivan, C. M. (1991a, August). Battered women as active helpseekers. Violence Update, pp. 1, 8.
31. Sullivan, C. M. (1991b). The provision of advocacy services to women leaving abusive partners: An exploratory study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6(1), 41-54.
32. Sullivan, C. M. (2000). A model for effectively advocating for women with abusive partners. In J. P. Vincent & E. N. Jouriles (Eds.), Domestic violence: Guidelines for researchinformed practice (pp. 126-143). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
33. Sullivan, C. M. (2003). Using the ESID model to reduce intimate male violence against women. American Journal of Community Psychology, 32(3-4), 295-303.
34. Sullivan, C. M., & Bybee, D. I. (1999). Reducing violence using community-based advocacy for women with abusive partners. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 43-53.
35. Sullivan, C. M., & Gillum, T. (2001). Shelters and community based services for battered women and their children. In C. M. Renzetti, J. L. Edleson, & R. Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (pp. 247-260). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Sullivan, C. M., & Rumptz, M. H. (1995). The adjustment and needs over time of AfricanAmerican women who have used a domestic violence shelter. Violence and Victims, 9, 275-286.
37. Sullivan, C. M., Tan, C., Basta, J., Rumptz, M., & Davidson, W. S. (1992). An advocacy intervention program for women with abusive partners: Initial evaluation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 309-322.