Legitimation and strategic maneuvering in the political field

Argumentation

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 399-417

  Ieţcu Fairclough, Isabela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BUCHAREST   (Romania)

Author keywords

Adjudication; Bourdieu; Legitimacy; Legitimation; Political field; Pragma dialectics; Public justification; Strategic maneuvering; Traian B sescu

Indexed keywords

EID: 48349134559     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-008-9088-9     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Beetham, D. (1991). The legitimation of power. London: MacMillan.
2. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
3. Christiano, T. (2004). Authority. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2004 edition), ed. E.N. Zalta. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2004/entries/authority/.
4. D'Agostino, F. (2007). Public Justification. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2007 edition), ed. E.N. Zalta. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2007/entries/justification-public/.
5. Habermas, J. (1976). Legitimation crisis. London: Heinemann.
6. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Volume one. Reason and the rationalization of society. London: Heinemann.
7. Habermas, J. (1996). Legitimation problems in the modern state. In The Habermas reader, ed. W. Outhwaite, Cambridge: Polity Press.
8. Ieţcu, I. (2006). Discourse analysis and argumentation theory: Analytical framework and applications. Bucureşti: Editura Universitǎţii din Bucureşti.
9. Ieţcu-Fairclough, I. (2007). Populism and the Romanian orange revolution: A discourse-analytical perspective on the presidential election of December 2004. Studies in Language and Capitalism 2(1): 31-74.
10. Ieţcu-Fairclough, I. (in press). Branding and strategic maneuvering in the Romanian presidential election of 2004. A critical discourse-analytical and pragma-dialectical perspective. Journal of Language and Politics.
11. Jacobs, S. (2002). Messages, functional contexts, and categories of fallacy: Some dialectical and rhetorical considerations. In Dialectic and rhetoric. The warp and woof of argumentation analysis, ed. F.H. van Eemeren and P. Houtlosser, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. (1992). Argumentation, communication and fallacies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. van Eemeren, F.H., and P. Houtlosser. (2002). Strategic maneuvering: Maintaining a delicate balance. In Dialectic and rhetoric. The warp and woof of argumentation analysis, ed. F.H. van Eemeren and P. Houtlosser, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15. van Eemeren, F.H., and P. Houtlosser. (2005). Theoretical construction and argumentative reality. An analytic model of critical discussion and conventionalized types of argumentative activity. In The uses of argument. Proceedings of a conference at Mcmaster university, ed. D. Hitchcock and D. Farr, 18-21, Hamilton, Ontario: OSSA.
16. van Eemeren, F.H., and P. Houtlosser. (2007). Coming to grips with argumentative discourse. In Reason reclaimed, ed. H.V. Hansen and R.C. Pinto, Newport News, VA: Vale Press.