Disorganizing biological motion

Journal of Vision

Volumn 8, Issue 9, 2008, Pages

  Hunt, Amelia R ^a   Halper, Fred ^a,b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Essex County College   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Biological motion; Object recognition; Perceptual biological motion

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; GAIT; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; WALKING;

ATTENTION; FORM PERCEPTION; GAIT; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; WALKING;

EID: 48249152943     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/8.9.12     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Barclay, C. D., Cutting, J. E., & Kozlowski, L. T. (1978). Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 145-152.
2. Bertenthal, B. I., & Pinto, J. (1994). Global processing of biological motions. Psychological Science, 5, 221-225.
3. Blake, R., & Shiffrar, M. (2007). Perception of human motion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 47-73.
4. Casile, A., & Giese, M. A. (2005). Critical features for the recognition of biological motion. Journal of Vision, 5(4):6, 348-360, http://journalofvision.org/5/4/6/, doi:10.1167/5.4.6.
5. Cavanagh, P., Labianca, A. T., & Thornton, I. M. (2001). Attention-based visual routines: Sprites. Cognition, 80, 47-60.
6. Clarke, T. J., Bradshaw, M. F., Field, D. T., Hampson, S. E., & Rose, D. (2005). The perception of emotion from body movement in point-light displays of interpersonal dialogue. Perception, 34, 1171-1180.
7. Cutting, J. E. (1978). Generation of synthetic male and female walkers through manipulation of a biomechanical invariant. Perception, 7, 393-405.
8. Dittrich, W. H. (1993). Action categories and the perception of biological motion. Perception, 22, 15-22.
9. Enns, J. T., & Kingstone, A. (1994). Access to global and local properties in visual search for compound stimuli. Psychological Science, 6, 283-291.
10. Epstein, W. (1994). Gunnar Johansson: A practical theorist. In G. Johansson, S. Bergstrom, & W. Epstein (Eds.), Perceiving events and objects (pp. 17-20). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Fox, R., & McDaniel, C. (1982). The perception of biological motion by human infants. Science, 218, 486-487.
12. Giese, M. A., & Poggio, T. (2003). Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nature Reviews, Neuroscience, 4, 179-192.
13. Jacobs, A., Pinto, J & Shiffrar, M. (2004). Experience, context, and the visual perception of human movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 822-835.
14. Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological analysis and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 195-204.
15. Johansson, G. (1976). Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception. An experimental and theoretical analysis of calculus-like functions in visual data processing. Psychological Research, 38, 379-393.
16. Kozlowski, L. T., & Cutting, J. E. (1977). Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Perception & Psychophysics, 21, 575-580.
17. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
18. Pavlova, M., & Sokolov, A. (2000). Orientation specificity in biological motion perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 889-899.
19. Pinto, J. (2006). Developing body representations: A review of infants' responses to biological motion displays. In Knoblich, et al. (Eds.), Human body perception from the inside out (pp. 17-20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Runeson, S., & Frykholm, G. (1983). Kinematic specification of dynamics as an information bias for person-and-action representation: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 582-615.
21. Tadin, D., Lappin, J. S., Blake, R., & Grossman, E. D. (2002). What constitutes an efficient reference frame for vision? Nature Neuroscience, 5, 1010-1015.
22. Thornton, I. M. (2006). Biological motion: Point-light walkers and beyond. In Knoblich, et al. (Ed.), Human body perception from the inside out (pp. 17-20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Thornton, I. M., & Vuong, Q. C. (2004). Incidental processing of biological motion. Current Biology, 14, 1084-1089.
24. Thornton, I. M., Rensink, R. A., & Shiffrar, M. (2002). Active versus passive processing of biological motion. Perception, 31, 837-853.
25. Troje, N. F., & Westhoff, C. (2006). The inversion effect in biological motion perception: Evidence for a "life detector?" Current Biology, 16, 821-824.