Evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss with audiometer and distortion product otoacoustic emissions

Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand

Volumn 91, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1066-1071

  Atchariyasathian, Viraporn ^a,c   Chayarpham, Satit ^a   Saekhow, Suchada ^b  

^a PRINCE OF SONGKLA UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b Department of Otorhinolaryngology   (Thailand)

^c PRINCE OF SONGKLA UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Occupational health; Otoacoustic emissions

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOGRAPHY; AUDIOMETER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; INDUSTRIAL NOISE; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION;

ADULT; AUDIOMETRY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HEARING LOSS, NOISE-INDUCED; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 48249152244     PISSN: 01252208     EISSN: 01252208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Celik O, Yalcin S, Ozturk A. Hearing parameters in noise exposed industrial workers. Auris Nasus Larynx 1998; 25: 369-75.
2. Lapsley Miller JA, Marshall L. Monitoring the effects of noise with otoacoustic emissions. Semin Hear 2001; 22: 393-403.
3. Kemp DT. Otoacoustic emissions, their origin in cochlear function, and use. Br Med Bull 2002; 63: 223-41.
4. Hall JW 3rd, Baer JE, Chase PA, Schwaber MK. Clinical application of otoacoustic emissions: what do we know about factors influencing measurement and analysis? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 110: 22-38.
5. Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 2027-67.
6. Emmerich E, Richter F, Reinhold U, Linss V, Linss W. Effects of industrial noise exposure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and hair cell loss of the cochlea - long term experiments in awake guinea pigs. Hear Res 2000; 148: 9-17.
7. Davis RI, Ahroon WA, Hamernik RP. The relation among hearing loss, sensory cell loss and tuning characteristics in the chinchilla. Hear Res 1989; 41: 1-14.
8. Lucertini M, Moleti A, Sisto R. On the detection of early cochlear damage by otoacoustic emission analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 111: 972-8.
9. Vinck BM, Van Cauwenberge PB, Leroy L, Corthals P. Sensitivity of transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions to the direct effects of noise on the human cochlea. Audiology 1999; 38: 44-52.
10. Eddins AC, Zuskov M, Salvi RJ. Changes in distortion product otoacoustic emissions during prolonged noise exposure. Hear Res 1999; 127: 119-28.
11. Olusanya B. Early detection of hearing impairment in a developing country: what options? Audiology 2001; 40: 141-7.
12. Sliwinska-Kowalska M, Kotylo P. Occupational exposure to noise decreases otoacoustic emission efferent suppression. Int J Audiol 2002; 41: 113-9.
13. Hall AJ, Lutman ME. Methods for early identification of noise-induced hearing loss. Audiology 1999; 38: 277-80.
14. Balatsouras DG. The evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss with distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Med Sci Monit 2004; 10: CR218-22.
15. Plinkert PK, Hemmert W, Wagner W, Just K, Zenner HP. Monitoring noise susceptibility: sensitivity of otoacoustic emissions and subjective audiometry. Br J Audiol 1999; 33: 367-82.
16. Bicciolo G, Ruscito P, Rizzo S, Frenguelli A. Evoked otoacoustic emissions in noise-induced hearing loss. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 1993; 13: 505-15.
17. Xu ZM, Van Cauwenberge P, Vinck B, De Vel E. Sensitive detection of noise-induced damage in human subjects using transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 1998; 52: 19-24.
18. Attias J, Horovitz G, El Hatib N, Nageris B. Detection and Clinical Diagnosis of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss by Otoacoustic Emissions. Noise Health 2001; 3: 19-31.
19. Engdahl B, Tambs K, Borchgrevink HM, Hoffman HJ. Otoacoustic emissions in the general adult population of Nord-Trondelag, Norway: III. Relationships with pure-tone hearing thresholds. Int J Audiol 2005; 44: 15-23.
20. Engdahl B, Tambs K, Borchgrevink HM, Hoffman HJ. Otoacoustic emissions in the general adult population of Nord-Trondelag, Norway: III. Relationship with pure-tone hearing thresholds. Inter J Audiol 2005;44:15-23.
21. Pholchan T, Peeravud S, Chayarpham S, Tuntiseranee P. Noise-induced hearing loss and its determinants among workers in food supply, central supply and maintenance departments at Songklanagarind Hospital. Songklanagarind Med J 2004; 22: 27-36.
22. Sliwinska-Kowalska M, Kotylo P. Is otoacoustic emission useful in the differential diagnosis of occupational noise-induced hearing loss? Med Pr 1997; 48: 613-20.
23. Hofstetter P, Ding D, Powers N, Salvi RJ. Quantitative relationship of carboplatin dose to magnitude of inner and outer hair cell loss and the reduction in distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitude in chinchillas. Hear Res 1997; 112: 199-215.
24. Lonsbury-Martin BL, Whitehead ML, Martin GK. Clinical applications of otoacoustic emissions. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 964-81.