Quantitative developmental analysis of homeotic changes in the inflorescence of Philodendron (Araceae)

Annals of Botany

Volumn 101, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1027-1034

  Barabé, Denis ^a   Lacroix, Christian ^b   Jeune, Bernard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND   (Canada)

Author keywords

Developmental constraint; Flower; Gradient; Homeosis; Philodendron; Positional information

Indexed keywords

FLOWER; HERB; HERMAPHRODITE; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; MODELING; MORPHOLOGY; MUTATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

ARACEAE; PHILODENDRON; PHILODENDRON BILLIETIAE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; FLOWER; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PHILODENDRON; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FLOWERS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PHILODENDRON; REPRODUCTION;

EID: 48249150293     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcn031     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adam H, Jouannic S, Escoute J, Duval Y, Verdeil J-L, Tregear JW. 2005. Reproductive developmental complexity in the african oil palm (Elaeis guinensis, Arecaceae). American Journal of Botany 92: 1836-1852.
2. Ambrose BA, Lerner DR, Ciceri P, Padilla CM, Yanofsky MF, Schmidt RJ. 2000. Molecular and genetic analyses of the Silky1 gene reveal conservation in floral organ specification between eudicots and monocots. Molecular Cell 5: 569-579.
3. Barabé D, Lacroix C. 2001. Aspects of floral development in Philodendron grandifolium and P. megalophyllum (Araceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 47-57.
4. Barabé D, Lacroix C. 2008. Hierarchical developmental morphology: the case of the inflorescence of Philodendron ornatum (Araceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 169. In press.
5. Barabé D, Lacroix C, Jeune B. 2000. Development of the inflorescence and flower of Philodendron fragrantissimum (Araceae): a qualitative and quantitative study. Canadian Journal of Botany 78: 557-576.
6. Barabé D, Lacroix C, Jeune B. 2002. Developmental morphology of normal and atypical flowers of Philodendron insigne (Araceae): a new case of homeosis. Canadian Journal of Botany 80: 1160-1172.
7. Barabé D, Lacroix C, Jeune B. 2004. The game of numbers in homeotic flowers of Philodendron (Araceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 82: 1459-1467.
8. Becker A, Winter K-U, Meyer B, Saedler H, Theißen G. 2000. MADS-box gene diversity in seed plants 300 million years ago. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17: 1425-1434.
9. Bossinger G, Smyth DR. 1996. Initiation patterns of flower and floral organ development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 122: 1093-1102.
10. Boubes C, Barabé D. 1996. Développement des inflorescences et des fleurs du Philodendron acutatum (Araceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 74: 909-918.
11. Coen ES, Meyerowitz EM. 1991. The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353: 31-37.
12. Croat TB. 1997. A revision of Philodendron subgenus Philodendron iAraceae) for Mexico and Central America. Annals of Missouri Botanical Garden 84: 311-704.
13. Engler A, Krause K. 1912. Araceae-Philodendroideae-Philodendreae. In: Engler A, ed. Das Planzenreich. Regni vegetabilis conspectus, 1-134. IV. 23Da. Heft 55. Leipzig: Engelmann. Reprinted 1966 (J. Cramer).
14. Frohlich MW, Meyerowitz EM. 1997. The search for flower homeotic gene homologs in basal angiosperms and Gnetales: a potential new source of data on the evolutionary origin of flowers. International Journal of Plant Sciences 158 (6 Suppl.): S131-S142.
15. Huang H, Ma H. 1997. FON1, an Arabidopsis gene that terminates floral meristem activity and controls flower organ number. Plant Cell 9: 115-134.
16. Kramer EM, Irish VF. 2000. Evolution of the petal and stamen developmental programs: evidence from comparative studies of the lower eudicots and basal angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 (6 Suppl.): S29-S40.
17. Lee S, Jeon J-S, An K, Moon Y-H, Lee S, Chung Y-Y, An G. 2003. Alteration of floral identity in rice through ectopic expression of OsMADS16. Planta 217: 904-911.
18. Lehmann N, Sattler R 1992. Irregular floral development in Calla palustris (Araceae) and the concept of homeosis. American Journal of Botany 79: 1145-1157.
19. Mayo SJ. 1986. Systematics of Philodendron Schott (Araceae) with special reference to inflorescences characters. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Reading, UK.
20. Mayo SJ. 1989. Observations of gynoecial structure in Philodendron (Araceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 100: 139-172
21. Mayo SJ, Bogner J, Boyce PC. 1997. The genera of Araceae. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
22. Mouradov A, Glassick TV, Hamdorf BA, Murphy LC, Marla SS, Yang Y, Teasdale RD. 1998. Family of MADS-box genes expressed early in male and female reproductive structures of Montery Pine. Plant Physiology 117: 55-61.
23. Nagasawa N, Miyoshi M, Sano Y, Satoh H, Hirano H, Sakai H, Nagato Y. 2003. SUPERWOMAN1 and DROOPING LEAF genes control floral organ identity in rice. Development 130: 705-718.
24. Purugganan MD. 1998. The molecular evolution of development. BioEssays 20: 700-711.
25. Ronse de Craene PL. 2003. The evolutionary significance of homeosis in flowers: a morphological perspective. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164 (5 Suppl.): S225-S235.
26. Running MP, Fletcher JC., Meyerowitz EM. 1998. The WIGGUM gene is required for proper regulation of floral meristem size in Arabidopsis. Development 125: 2545-2553.
27. Sattler R 1988. Homeosis in plants. American Journal of Botany 75: 1606-1617.
28. Sattler R. 1994. Homology, homeosis and process morphology in plants. In: Hall BK. ed. Homology: the hierarchical basis of comparative biology. London: Academic Press, 423-475.
29. Theißen G. 2001. Development of floral organ identity: stories from MADS house. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 4: 75-85.
30. Vergara-Silva F. 2003. Plants and the conceptual articulation of evolutionary developmental biology. Biological Philosophy 18: 249-284.
31. Vogel S. 1977. Nektarien und ihre ökologische Bedeutung. Apidologie 8: 321-335.
32. Winter K-U, Becker A, Münster T, Kim JT, Saedlerand H, Theißen G. 1999. MADS-box genes reveal that gnetophytes are more closely related to conifers than to flowering plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96: 7342-7347.
33. Yamaguchi T, Nagasawa N, Kawasaki S, Matsuoka M, Nagato Y, Hirano H-Y. 2004. The YABBY gene DROOPING LEAF regulates carpel specification and midrib development in Oryza satival. Plant Cel 16: 500-509.