Erratum: Metrics of the perception of body movement (Journal of Vision (2008) vol. 8 (9) (1-18) 10.1167/8.9.13);Metrics of the perception of body movement

Journal of Vision

Volumn 8, Issue 9, 2008, Pages

  Giese, Martin A ^a,b   Thornton, Ian ^c,d   Edelman, Shimon ^e  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^c SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^e Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological motion; Distance; MDS; Metric; Motion morphing; Similarity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOVEMENT; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 48249111310     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/8.12.11     Document Type: Erratum

References (90)

1. Aggarwal, J. K., & Cai, Q. (1999). Human motion analysis: A review. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 73, 428-440.
2. Ashby, F. G., & Perrin, N. A. (1988). Toward a unified theory of similarity and recognition. Psychological Review, 95, 124-150.
3. Barclay, C. D., Cutting, J. E., & Kozlowski, L. T. (1978). Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 145-152.
4. Beintema, J. A., & Lappe, M. (2002). Perception of biological motion without local image motion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 5661-5663.
5. Beintema, J. A., Oleksiak, A., & van Wezel, R. J. (2006). The influence of biological motion perception on structure-from-motion interpretations at different speeds. Journal of Vision, 6(7):4, 712-726, http://journalofvision.org/6/7/4/, doi:10.1167/6.7.4.
6. Bertenthal, B. I., & Pinto, J. (1994). Global processing of biological motions. Psychological Science, 5, 221-225.
7. Biess, A., Liebermann, D. G., & Flash, T. (2007). A computational model for redundant human three-dimensional pointing movements: Integration of independent spatial and temporal motor plans simplifies movement dynamics. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 13045-13064.
8. Blake, R., & Shiffrar, M. (2007). Perception of human motion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 47-73.
9. Bobick, A. F. (1997). Movement, activity and action: The role of knowledge in the perception of motion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 352, 1257-1265.
10. Borg, L, & Groenen, P. (1997). Modern multidimensional scaling. New York: Springer-Verlag.
11. Bruderlin, A., & Williams, L. (1995). Motion signal processing. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (pp. 97-104). New York: ACM Press.
12. Bülthoff, I., Bülthoff, H., & Sinha, P. (1998). Top-down influences on stereoscopic depth-perception. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 254-257.
13. Carroll, J. D., & Chang, J. J. (1970). Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via and N-way generalization of the Eckart-Young decomposition. Psychometrika, 35, 283-319.
14. Casile, A., & Giese, M. A. (2005). Critical features for the recognition of biological motion. Journal of Vision, 5(4):6, 348-360, http://journalofvision.org/5/4/6/, doi:10.1167/5.4.6.
15. Chen, Z., & Lee, H.-J. (1992). Knowledge-guided visual perception of 3-D human gait from a single image sequence. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 22, 336-342.
16. Cutzu, F., & Edelman, S. (1996). Faithful representation of similarities among three-dimensional shapes in human vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93, 12046-12050.
17. Cutzu, F., & Edelman, S. (1998). Representation of object similarity in human vision: Psychophysics and a computational model. Vision Research, 38, 2229-2257.
18. Decety, J., & Grèzes, J. (1999). Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 172-178.
19. Dittrich, W. H., Troscianko, T., Lea, S. E., & Morgan, D. (1996). Perception of emotion from dynamic point-light displays represented in dance. Perception, 25, 727-738.
20. Edelman, S. (1999). Representation and recognition in vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1993). An introduction to the Bootstrap. New York, London: Chapman and Hall.
22. Giese, M. A., Knappmeyer, B., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2002). Automatic synthesis of sequences of human movements by linear combination of learned example patterns. In H. H. Bülthoff, S. W. Lee, T. Poggio, & C. Wallraven (Eds.), Biologically motivated computer vision (pp. 538-547). Berlin: Springer.
23. Giese, M. A., & Lappe, M. (2002). Measurement of generalization fields for the recognition of biological motion. Vision Research, 42, 1847-1858.
24. Giese, M. A., & Poggio, T. (2000). Morphable models for the analysis and synthesis of complex motion patterns. International Journal of Computer Vision, 38, 59-73.
25. Giese, M. A., & Poggio, T. (2003). Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements [Abstract]. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 179-192.
26. Giese, M. A., Thornton, I. M., & Edelman, S. E. (2003). Metric category spaces of biological motion. Journal of Vision, 3(9):83, 83a, http://journalofvision.org/3/9/83/, doi:10.1167/3.9.83.
27. Gleicher, M. (2001). Comparing constraint-based motion editing methods. Graphical Models, 63, 107-134.
28. Grossman, E. D., & Blake, R. (2002). Brain areas active during visual perception of biological motion. Neuron, 35, 1167-1175.
29. Hill, H., & Pollick, F. E. (2000). Exaggerating temporal differences enhances recognition of individuals from point light displays. Psychological Science, 11, 223-228.
30. Hoffman, D. D., & Flinchbaugh, B. E. (1982). The interpretation of biological motion. Biological Cybernetics, 42, 195-204.
31. Hogg, D. (1983). Model-based vision: A program to see a walking person. Image and Vision Computing, 1, 5-20.
32. Hopfield, J. J., & Brody, C. D. (2001). What is a moment? Transient synchrony as a collective mechanism for spatiotemporal integration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 1282-1287.
33. Ilg, W., Bakir, G. H., Mezger, J., & Giese, M. A. (2004). On the representation, learning and transfer of spatio-temporal movement characteristics. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 1, 613-636.
34. Jacobs, A., Pinto, J., & Shiffrar, M. (2004). Experience, context, and the visual perception of human movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 822-835.
35. Jacobs, A., & Shiffrar, M. (2005). Walking perception by walking observers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 157-169.
36. Jastorff, J., Kourtzi, Z., & Giese, M. A. (2006). Learning to discriminate complex movements: Biological versus artificial trajectories. Journal of Vision, 6 (8):3, 791-804, http://journalofvision.org/6/8/3/, doi:10.1167/6.8.3.
37. Jellema, T., & Perrett, D. I. (2006). Neural representations of perceived bodily actions using a categorical frame of reference. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1535-1546.
38. Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 201-211.
39. Jokisch, D., Daum, I., & Troje, N. F. (2006). Self recognition versus recognition of others by biological motion: Viewpoint-dependent effects. Perception, 35, 911-920.
40. Jordan, H., Fallah, M., & Stoner, G. R. (2006). Adaptation of gender derived from biological motion. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 738-739.
41. Kozlowski, L. T., & Cutting, J. E. (1977). Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Perception & Psychophysics, 21, 575-580.
42. Kreyszig, E. (1989). Introductory functional analysis with applications. New York: Wiley.
43. Lange, J., & Lappe, M. (2006). A model of biological motion perception from configural form cues. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 2894-2906.
44. Lee, J., & Shin, S. Y. (1999). A hierarchical approach to interactive motion editing for human-like figures. Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (pp. 39-48). New York: ACM Press.
45. Leopold, D. A., Bondar, I. V., & Giese, M. A. (2006) Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nature, 442, 572-575.
46. Leopold, D. A., O'Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., & Blanz, V. (2001). Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 89-94.
47. Li, S., Ostwald, D., Giese, M., & Kourtzi, Z. (2007). Flexible coding for categorical decisions in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 12321-12330.
48. Little, J. J,, & Boyd, J. E. (1998). Recognizing people by their gait: The shape of motion, Videre, 1, 2-32.
49. Marr, D., & Vaina, L. (1982). Representation and recognition of the movements of shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 214, 501-524.
50. Mather, G., Radford, K., & West, S. (1992). Low-level visual processing of biological motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 249, 149-155.
51. Mezger, J. Ilg, W., & Giese, M. A. (2005). Trajectory synthesis by hierarchical spatio-temporal correspondence: Comparison of different methods. Proceedings of the 2nd symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (pp. 25-32). New York: ACM Press.
52. Nosofsky, R. M. (1992). Similarity scaling and cognitive process models. Annual Review of Psychology, 1992, 25-53.
53. Op de Beeck, H., Wagemans, J., & Vogels, R. (2001). Inferotemporal neurons represent low-dimensional configurations of parameterized shapes. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 1244-1252. [PubMed]
54. O'Rourke, J., & Badler, N. (1980). Model-based image analysis of human motion using constraint propagation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2, 522-536.
55. Pelli, D. G., & Zhang, L. (1991). Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays. Vision Research, 31, 1337-1350. [PubMed]
56. Perrett, D. I., & Oram, M. W. (1998). Visual recognition based on temporal cortex cells: Viewer-centred processing of pattern configuration. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C: Journal of Biosciences, 53, 518-541. [PubMed]
57. Peuskens, H., Vanrie, J., Verfaillie, K., & Orban, G. A. (2005). Specificity of regions processing biological motion. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 2864--2875. [PubMed]
58. Pollick, F. E., Fidopiastis, C., & Braden, V. (2001). Recognising the style of spatially exaggerated tennis serves. Perception, 30, 323-338. [PubMed]
59. Pollick, F. E., Lestou, V., Ryu, J., & Cho, S. B. (2002). Estimating the efficiency of recognizing gender and affect from biological motion. Vision Research, 42, 2345-2355. [PubMed]
60. Pollick, F. E., Paterson, H. M., Bruderlin, A., & Sanford, A. J. (2001). Perceiving affect from arm movement. Cognition, 82, B51-B61. [PubMed]
61. Puce, A., & Perrett, D. (2003). Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 358, 435-445. [PubMed] [Article]
62. Rabiner, L., & Juang, B. H. (1993). Fundamentals of speech recognition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PTR Prentice Hall.
63. Rensink, R. A. (1990). Toolbox-based routines for Macintosh timing and display. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 22, 105-117.
64. Rhodes, G., Brennan, S., & Carey, S. (1987). Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 473-497.
65. Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999). Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 1019-1025.
66. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192.
67. Rohr, K. (1994). Towards model-based recognition of human movements in image sequences. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing. Image Understanding, 59, 95-115.
68. Rose, C., Cohen, M. F., & Bodenheimer, B. (1998). Verbs and adverbs: Multidimensional motion interpolation. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 18, 32-40.
69. Sawada, M., Suda, K., & Ishii, M. (2003). Expression of emotions in dance: Relation between arm movement characteristics and emotion. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 97, 697-708.
70. Shepard, R. N. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237, 1317-1323.
71. Shepard, R. N., & Chipman, S. (1970). Second-order isomorphism of internal representations: Shapes of states. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 1-17.
72. Singer, J., & Sheinberg, D. L. (2008). A method for the real-time rendering of formless dot field structure-from-motion stimuli. Journal of Vision, 8(5):8, 1-8, http://journalofvision.org/8/5/8/, doi:10.1167/8.5.8.
73. Steinman, S. B., & Nawrot, M. (1992). Real-time color-frame animation for visual psychophysics on the Macintosh computer. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 24, 439-452.
74. Sugihara, T., Edelman, S., & Tanaka, K. (1998). Representation of objective similarity among three-dimensional shapes in the monkey. Biological Cybernetics, 78, 1-7.
75. Thurman, S. M., & Grossman, E. D. (2008). Temporal "Bubbles" reveal key features in point-light biological motion perception. Journal of Vision, 8(3):28, 1-11,
76. Todd, J. T. (1983). Perception of gait. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 31-42.
77. Troje, N. F. (2002). Decomposing biological motion: A framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. Journal of Vision, 2(5):2, 371-387, http://journalofvision.org/2/5/2/, doi:10.1167/ 2.5.2.
78. Troje, N. F., Sadr, J., Geyer, H., & Nakayama, K. (2006). Adaptation aftereffects in the perception of gender from biological motion. Journal of Vision, 6(8):7, 850-857, http://journalofvision.org/6/ 8/7/, doi:10.1167/6.8.7.
79. Troje, N. F., Westhoff, C., & Lavrov, M. (2005). Person identification from biological motion: Effects of structural and kinematic cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 667-675.
80. Unuma, M., Anjyo, K., & Takeuchi, R. (1995). Fourier principles for emotion-based human figure animation. Motion signal processing. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (pp. 91-96). New York: ACM Press.
81. Vaina, L. M., Solomon, J., Chowdhury, S., Sinha, P., & Belliveau, J. W. (2001). Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 11656-11661.
82. Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 43, 161-204.
83. Vangeneugden, J., Pollick, F., & Vogels, R. (2006). Responses of macaque superior temporal sulcus neurons to a parameterized set of dynamic images of visual actions. Paper presented at the Society for Neuroscience 36th Annual meeting, Atlanta, GA.
84. Veeraraghavan, A., Roy-Chowdhury, A. K., & Chellappa, R. (2005). Matching shape sequences in video with applications in human movement analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 27, 1896-1909.
85. Webb, J. A., & Aggarwal, J. K. (1982). Structure from motion of rigid and jointed objects. Artificial Intelligence, 19, 107-130.
86. Webster, M. A., Kaping, D., Mizokami, Y., & Duhamel, P. (2004). Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature, 428, 557-561.
87. Westhoff, C., & Troje, N. F. (2007). Kinematic cues for person identification from biological motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 241-253.
88. Wiley, D. J., & Hahn, J. K. (1997). Interpolation synthesis of articulated figure motion. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 17, 39-45.
89. Witkin, A., & Popovic, Z. (1995). Motion warping. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (pp. 105-108). New York: ACM Press.
90. Yacoob, Y., & Black, M. J. (1999). Parameterized modeling and recognition of activities. Journal of Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 73, 232-247.