Student sampling as a theoretical problem

Psychological Inquiry

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 114-126

  Henry, P J ^a,b,c  

^a DEPAUL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c Department of Psychology ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 48249104411     PISSN: 1047840X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10478400802049951     Document Type: Note

References (32)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Alwin, D. F., Cohen, R. L., & Newcomb, T. M. (1991). Political attitudes over the life span. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
3. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.
4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1, 311-320.
6. Blanton, H., & Jaccard, J. (2006). Arbitrary metrics redux. American Psychologist, 61, 62-71.
7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
9. Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., Wittenbrink, B., Sadler, M. S., & Keesee, T. (2007). Across the thin blue line: Police officers and racial bias in the decision to shoot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1006-1023.
10. Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 92, 631-648.
11. Davis, J., & Henry, P. J. (2008, February). The culture of the lab: Influences of the college setting on social psychology's view of the nature of prejudice. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Albuquerque, NM.
12. Fiedler, K. (2007). Information ecology and the explanation of social cognition and behavior. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 176-200). New York: Guilford.
13. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. E (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. R Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 1-34). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
14. Hamilton, W. (1994). The demographics of a movement-Christian Right special report. Campaigns and Elections. 15, 28-29.
15. Henry, P. J., & Davis, J. (2008). Procedural justice preferences as low-status compensation. Manuscript in preparation.
16. Henry, P. J., Sidanius, J., Levin, S., & Pratto, R (2005). Social dominance orientation, authoritarianism, and support for intergroup violence between the Middle East and America. Political Psychology, 26, 569-583.
17. Higgins, E. T. (2006). Theory development as a family affair. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 129-132.
18. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Lowery, B. S., Hardin, C. D., & Sinclair, S. (2001). Social influence effects on automatic racial prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 842-855.
20. McKinnon, J. (2001). The Black population: 2000 (Census 2000 brief). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
21. Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38, 379-387.
22. Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.
23. Mullen, B., & Hu, L.-T. (1989). Perceptions of ingroup and outgroup variability: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 233-252.
24. Ostrom, T. M., & Sedikides, C. (1992). Out-group homogeneity effects in natural and minimal groups. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 536-552.
25. Peterson, R. A. (2001). On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 450-461.
26. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-783.
27. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44, 1276-1284.
29. Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515-530.
30. Sears, D. O, & Henry, P. J. (2005). Over thirty years later: A contemporary look at symbolic racism and its critics. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 95-150.
31. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Sinclair, S., Huntsinger, J., Skorinko, J., & Hardin, C. D. (2005). Social tuning of the self: Consequences for the self-evaluations of stereotype targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 160-175.