Adaptive worker's arrangement and workload control for project management by genetic algorithm

International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 175-188

  Okuhara, Koji ^a   Shibata, Junko ^b   Ishii, Hiroaki ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KOBE GAKUIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Genetic algorithm; Project management; Worker's arrangement; Workload control

Indexed keywords

EID: 48249098729     PISSN: 13494198     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Turner, J. R., Towards a theory of project management: The functions of project management, International Journal of Project Management, vol.24, no.3, pp.187-189, 2006.
2. Belout, A. and C. Gauvreau, Factors influencing project success: The impact of human resource management, International Journal of Project Management, vol.22, no.l, pp.1-11, 2004.
3. Malcolm, D. G., J. H. Oseboom, C. E. Clark and W. Fazar, Application of a technique for research and development program evaluation, Operations Research, vol.7, pp.646-669, 1959.
4. Kelley, J. E., Critical path planning scheduling Mathematical basis, Operations Research, vol.9, pp.296-320, 1961.
5. Tavares, L. V., A review of the contribution of operational research to project management, European Journal of Operational Research, vol.136, no.l, pp.1-181, 2002.
6. Herroelen, W. and R. Leus, Project scheduling under uncertainty: Survey and research potentials, European Journal of Operational Research, vol.165, no.2, pp.289-306, 2005.
7. Holland, J. H., Adapptation in Natural and Artifical Systems, University of Michigan Press, 1975.
8. Hanne, T. and S. Nickel, A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for scheduling and inspection planning in software development projects, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 167, no.3, pp.663-678, 2005.
9. Belassi, W. and O. I. Tukel, A new framework for determining critical success/failure factors in projects, International Journal of Project Management, vol.14, no.3, pp.141-151, 1996.
10. Anderson, D. K. and T. Merna, Project management strategy? Project management represented as a process based set of management domains and the consequences for project management strategy, International Journal of Project Management, vol.21, no.6, pp.387-393, 2003.
11. Leybourne, S. and E. Sadler-Smith, The role of intuition and improvisation in project management, International Journal of Project Management, vol.24, no.6, pp.483-492, 2006.
12. IEICE (ed.), Information Network Handbook, Ohmsha, 1988.
13. Ikeno, N. and Y. Yokoyama, Computer Communication Network, Kindai Kagakusha, 1983.
14. Tsujimura, Y., M. Gen and S. Ishizaki, Optimal routing in multiple I/O data network using neural network with perturbed energy function, Proc. of the International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering, pp.893-896, 1996.
15. Dijkstra, E. W., A note of two problems in connection with graphs, Numerische Mathematik, vol.l, pp.269-271, 1959.
16. Bertsekas, D. and R. Gallager, Data Networks, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1987.
17. Inagaki, J., M. Haseyama and H. Kitajima, A method of determining various solutions for routing application with a genetic algorithm, IEICE Trans. D-I, vol.J82-D-I, no.8, pp.1102-1111, 1999.
18. Munetomo, M., Y. Takai and Y. Sato, An adaptive routing algorithm with load balancing by genetic algorithm, IPSJ Transactions, vol.39, no.2, pp.219-227, 1998.
19. Sakawa, M. and M. Tanaka, Genetic Algorithm, Asakurashoten, 1995.