Testing reciprocity in social interactions: A comparison between the directional consistency and skew-symmetry statistics

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 626-634

  Leiva, David ^a   Solanas, Antonio ^a   Salafranca, Lluís ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; METHODOLOGY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 48149115388     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BRM.40.2.626     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. ADAMS, E. S. (2005). Bayesian analysis of linear dominance hierarchies. Animal Behaviour, 69, 1191-1201.
2. APPLEBY, M. C. (1983). The probability of linearity in hierarchies. Animal Behaviour, 31, 600-608.
3. BAUER, E. B., & SMUTS, B. B. (2007). Cooperation and competition during dyadic play in domestic dogs, Canis jamiliaris. Animal Behaviour, 73, 489-499.
4. BOYD, R., & SILK, J. B. (1983). A method for assigning cardinal dominance ranks. Animal Behaviour, 31, 45-58.
5. CONSTANTINE, A. G., & GOWER, J. C. (1978). Graphical representation of asymmetric matrices. Applied Statistics, 27, 297-304.
6. CÔTÉ, S. D. (2000). Determining social rank in ungulates: A comparison of aggressive interactions recorded at a bait site and under natural conditions. Ethology, 106, 945-955.
7. DE VRIES, H. (1995). An improved test of linearity in dominance hierarchies containing unknown or tied relationships. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1375-1389.
8. DE VRIES, H. (1998). Finding a dominance order most consistent with a linear hierarchy: A new procedure and review. Animal Behaviour, 55, 827-843.
9. HEMELRIJK, C. K. (1990a). A matrix partial correlation test used in investigations of reciprocity and other social interaction patterns at group level. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 143, 405-420.
10. HEMELRIJK, C. K. (1990b). Models of, and tests for, reciprocity, unidirectionality and other social interaction patterns at a group level. Animal Behaviour, 39, 1013-1029.
11. KENNY, D. A. ( 1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford.
12. KENNY, D. A., KASHY, D. A., & COOK, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford.
13. KENNY, D. A., & LA VOIE, L. J. (1984). The social relations model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 142-182). San Diego: Academic Press.
14. KOENIG, A., LARNEY, E., LU, A., & BORRIES, C. (2004). Agonistic behavior and dominance relationships in female Phayre's leaf monkeys - preliminary results. American Journal ofPrimatology, 64, 351-357.
15. LANDAU, H. G. (1951). On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies: I. Effect of inherent characteristics. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 13, 1-19.
16. MANLY, B. F. J. (2007). Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
17. NOREEN, E. W. (1989). Computer-intensive methods for testing hypotheses: An introduction. New York: Wiley.
18. ONGHENA, P., & MAY, R. B. (199S). Pitfalls in computing and interpreting randomization test p values: A commentary on Chen and Dunlap. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments. & Computers, 27, 408-411.
19. PELLETIER, F., & FESTA-BIANCHET, M. (2006). Sexual selection and social rank in bighorn rams. Animal Behaviour, 71, 649-655.
20. PERES-NETO, P. R., & OLDEN, J. D. (2001). Assessing the robustness of randomization tests: Examples from behavioural studies. Animal Behaviour, 61, 79-86.
21. RAPOPORT, A. ( 1949). Outline of a probabilistic approach to animal sociology: I. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 11, 183-191.
22. SOLANAS, A., SALAFRANCA, L., RIBA, C., SIERRA, V., & LEIVA, D. (2006). Quantifying social asymmetric structures. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 390-399.
23. STEVENS, J. M. G., VERVAECKE, H., DE VRIES, H., & VAN ELSACKER, L. (2005). Peering is not a formal indicator of subordination in bonobos (Pan paniscus). American Journal of Primatology, 65, 255-267.
24. TUFTO, J., SOLBERG, E. J., & RINGSBY, T.-H. (1998). Statistical models of transitive and intransitive dominance structures. Animal Behaviour, 55, 1489-1498.
25. VAN HOOFF, J. A. R. A. M., & WENSING, J. A. B. (1987). Dominance and its behavioral measures in a captive wolf pack. In H. W. Frank (Ed.), Man and wolf (pp. 219-252). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Junk Publishers.
26. VERVAECKE, H., DE VRIES, H., & VAN ELSACKER, L. (1999). An experimental evaluation of the consistency of competitive ability and agonistic dominance in different social contexts in captive bonobos. Behaviour, 136, 423-442.
27. VOGEL, E. R. (2005). Rank differences in energy intake rates in white-faced capuchin monkeys, Cebus capucinus: The effects of contest competition. Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology, 58, 333-344.
28. WARNER, R. M., KENNY, D. A., & STOTO, M. (1979). A new round robin analysis of variance for social interaction data. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 37, 1742-1757.