Statistical models of transitive and intransitive dominance structures

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 55, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 1489-1498

  Tufto, Jarle ^a   Solberg, Erling Johan ^a   Ringsby, Thor Harald ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOMINANCE; INTRASPECIFIC INTERACTION; MODELLING;

EID: 0032103589     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0755     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Appleby M. C. The probability of linearity in hierarchies. Anim. Behav. 31:1983;600-608.
2. Barrette C., Vandal D. Social rank, dominance, antler size, and access to food in snow-bound wild woodland caribou. Behaviour. 97:1986;118-146.
3. van den Bos R., De Cock Buning T. Social behaviour of domestic cats (Felis lybicacatus. Ethology. 98:1994;14-37.
4. Boyd R., Silk J. B. A method for assigning cardinal dominance ranks. Anim. Behav. 31:1983;45-58.
5. Bradley R. A., Terry M. E. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs. I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika. 39:1952;324-345.
6. Bulger J. B. Dominance rank and access to estrous females in male savanna baboons. Behaviour. 127:1993;67-104.
7. Edwards C. H., Penney D. E. Calculus and Analytic Geometry. 1986;Prentice-Hall. London.
8. Gust D., Gordon T. The absence of a matrilineally based dominance system in sooty mangabeys,Cercocebus torquatus. Anim. Behav. 47:1994;589-594.
9. Haley M. P., Deutsch C. J., Le Boeuf B. J. Size, dominance and copulatory success in male northern elephant seals,Mirounga angustirostris. Anim. Behav. 48:1994;1249-1260.
10. Iverson G. J., Sade D. S. Statistical issues in the analysis of dominance hierarchies in animal societies. J. Quant. Anthropol. 2:1990;61-83.
11. Jenks S., Weldele M., Frank L. G., Glickman S. E. Acquisition of matrilineal rank in captive spotted hyaenas: emergence of a natural social system in peer-reared animals and their offspring. Anim. Behav. 50:1995;893-904.
12. Kendall M., Gibbons J. D. Rank Correlation Methods. 1990;Oxford University Press. New York.
13. Lahti K., Koivula K., Orell M. Is the social hierarchy always linear in tits. J. Avian Biol. 25:1994;347-348.
14. McCullagh P., Nelder J. A. Generalized Linear Models. 1989;Chapman & Hall. London.
15. van der Meer J. Statistical analysis of the dichotomous preference test. Anim. Behav. 44:1992;1101-1106.
16. Møller A. P. Variation in badge size in male house sparrowsPasser domesticus. Anim. Behav. 35:1987;1637-1644.
17. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements Through Release 6.11. 1996;SAS Institute. Cary.
18. Solberg E. J., Ringsby T. H. Does male badge size signal status in small island populations of house sparrowPasser domesticus. Ethology. 103:1997;177-186.
19. Tversky A. Intransitivity of preference. Psychol. Rev. 76:1969;31-48.
20. de Vries H. An improved test of linearity in dominance hierarchies containing unknown or tied relationships. Anim. Behav. 50:1995;1375-1389.