Towards a strategy for implementing e-governance applications: A case study of integrated fertilisers management information system based on SAP-LAP framework

Electronic Government

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 420-444

  Suri, P K ^a   Sushil, ^b  

^a National Informatics Centre   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI   (India)

Author keywords

E governance; E government; Fertilisers informatics; SAP LAP; Situation actor process learning action performance; Stakeholders; Strategy

Indexed keywords

EID: 48049117063     PISSN: 17407494     EISSN: 17407508     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/EG.2008.019527     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aicholzer, G., and Schmutzer, R. (2000) 'Organizational challenges to the development of electronic government', retrieved from ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/7035/18943/00875054.pdf.
2. Backus, M. (2001) 'E-governance in developing countries', IICD Research Brief-No1, retrieved from http://www.ftpiicd.org/files/ research/briefs/briefl.doc.
3. Bhatnagar, S. (2004) E-government - From Vision to Implementation: A Practical Guide to Implementation, Sage Publications, New Delhi, pp.61-62.
4. Chakrabarty, S. (2003) 'Redefining strategies in the new business environment', Seminar Papers, The Fertiliser Association of India, December, SIV-2/3.
5. Chand, R. (2005) 'India's national agricultural policy: A critique', in Chand, R. (Ed.): India's Agricultural Challenges, Centad, New Delhi, pp.23-28.
6. Checkland, P. (198 1) Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, John Willey & Sons, New York, NY.
7. Department of Agriculture and Cooperation (2005-06, 2006-07) Annual Reports, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India.
8. Department of Fertilisers (DoF) (2002-2007) Information Technology Plan, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilisers Government of India.
9. Department of Fertilisers (DoF) (2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07) Annual Reports, Ministry of Chemicals & Fertilisers, Government of India.
10. Department of Fertilisers, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilisers, Government of India (1998) Information Technology Plan for the Fertiliser Sector, December.
11. Fertilisers Informatics Division, National Informatics Centre, Integrated Fertilisers Management Information System Project Documents
12. Freeman, R.E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Pitman, Boston.
13. Gupta, M.P., Kumar, P., and Jaijit, B. (2004) Government Online: Opportunities and Challenges, Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi, pp. 124-125.
14. Heeks,R. (2003) 'Most e-government - for development projects fail: How can risks be reduced?', i-Government Working Paper Series Paper No. 14, retrieved from http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/idpm/research/ publications/wp/igovernment/documents/igov_wp14.pdf
15. Hill, J.D., and Warfield, J.N. (1972) 'Unified program planning', IEEE Transactions : System, Man and Cybernatics', Vol.2, No.5, pp.610-621.
16. Jeanne, W.R., and Peter, W. (2002) 'Six IT decisions your IT people shouldn't make', Harvard Business Review, November, pp.84-91.
17. Kawalek, P., and Wastall, D. (2005) 'Pursuing radical transformation in information age government: Case studies using the sprint methodology', Journal of Global Information Management, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp.79-1 0 1.
18. Kumar, P., Sushil and Gupta, M.P. (2004) 'Effectiveness and change management in e-governance', in Gupta, M.P. (Ed.): Towards E-Government - Management Challenges, Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi, pp.256-264.
19. Layne, K. and Lee, J. (2001) 'Developing fully functional e-government: a four stage model', Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp.122-136.
20. National Informatics Centre (2005) Good Governance Through ICT, pp.22.
21. Pande, A.S. (2004) 'An emergent complex systems perspective on e-governance', in Gupta, M.P. (Ed.): Towards E-Government - Management Challenges, Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi pp.237-246.
22. Pardo, T.A., Scholl, H.J., Cook, M.E., Connelly, D.R., and Dawes, S.S. (2000) 'New York State central accounting system stakeholder needs analysis', Albany/SUNY, NY: Centre for Technology in Government, retrieved from http://www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/reports/ nys_central_acctng.
23. Planning Commission (2002), Tenth Five Year Plan Document (2002-07 Planning Commission, Government of India, retrieved from http://www.planningcommission.nic.in/plans/planrel/fiveyr/lOtli/ volume2/v2_ch7_4.pdf
24. Planning Commission (2006), Towards Faster and More Inclusive Growth, An Approach to the 11th Five Year Plan, retrieved from http://planningcommission.nic.in/plans/planrel/app11_16jan.pdf
25. Scholl, H.J. (2005) 'Interoperability in e-government: More than just smart middleware', Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/9518/30166/ 01385487.pdf?tp-&arnumber=1385487&isnumber=30166.
26. Scott, M., Golden, W. and Hughes, M. (2004) 'Implementing strategies for e-government: A stakeholder analysis approach', retrieved from www.is2.lse.ac.uk/asp/aspecis/20040151.pdf.
27. Sushil (1997) 'Flexible systems management: An evolving paradigm', Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp.259-275.
28. Sushil (2000) 'SAP-LAP models of inquiry', Management Decision, Vol. 38, No. 5/6, pp.347-353.
29. Tan, C.W., Shan L. Pan, S.L. and Lim, E.T.K. (2005) 'Managing stakeholder interests in e-government implementation: Lessons learned from a Singapore e-government project', Journal of Global Information Management, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 1-30.
30. Themistocleous, M., Irani Z. and Love, P.E.D. (2005) 'Developing e-government integrated infrastructures: A case study', Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/9518/30166/ 01385706.pdf?tp=&arnumber=1385706&isnumber=30166.
31. Wescott, C. (2002) E-government in the Asia Pacific Region, retrieved from http://www.adb.org/Documents/Papers/E_Government/default.asp