Stem structure and evolution in the earliest pelmatozoan echinoderms

Journal of Paleontology

Volumn 82, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 737-748

  Clausen, Sebastien ^a   Smith, Andrew B ^b  

^a Univ Lille   (France)

^b DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCITE; CAMBRIAN; COLLAGEN; ECHINODERM; EVOLUTION; MORPHOLOGY; SKELETAL REMAINS; TAXONOMY;

AFRICA; MOROCCO; NORTH AFRICA;

ECHINODERMATA; PELMATOZOA;

EID: 47949121224     PISSN: 00223360     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1666/06-067.1     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. ÁLVARO, J. J., O. ELICKI, G. GEYER, AND A. W. A. RUSHTON. 2003. Palaeogeographical controls on the Cambrian trilobite immigration and evolutionary patterns reported in the western Gondwana margin. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 195:5-35.
2. ÁLVARO, J. J. AND S. CLAUSEN. 2005. Major geodynamic and sedimentary constraints on the chronostratigraphic correlation of the Lower-Middle Cambrian transition in the western Mediterranean region. Geosciences Journal, 9:145-160.
3. ÁLVARO, J. J. AND S. CLAUSEN. 2006. Microbial crusts as indicators of stratigraphic diastems in the Cambrian Micmacca Breccia, Moroccan Atlas. Sedimentary Geology, 185:255-265.
4. ÁLVARO, J. J. AND S. CLAUSEN. In press. Paleoenvironmental significance of hiatal shell accumulations in a Cambrian epeirogenic platform. Geological Society of Canada, Special Volume.
5. AUSICH, W. I. 1996. Origin of the Crinoidea, p. 127-132. In R. Mooi and M. Telford (eds.), Echinoderms: San Francisco. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.
6. AUSICH, W. I. 1997. Calyx plate homologies and early evolutionary history of the Crinoidea, p. 289-304. In J. A. Waters and C. G. Maples (eds.), Geobiology of Echinoderms. The Paleontological Society Papers, 3.
7. AUSICH, W. I. 1998a. Origin of crinoids, p. 237-242. In M. D. Candia Carnevali and F Bonasoro (eds.), Echinoderm Research 1998. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.
8. AUSICH, W. I. 1998b. Early phylogeny and subphylum division of the Crinoidea (Phylum Echinodermata). Journal of Paleontology, 72:499-510.
9. AUSICH, W. I. 1998c. Phylogeny of Arenig to Caradoc crinoids (Phylum Echinodermata) and suprageneric classification of the Crinoidea. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, New Series, 9:1-36.
10. AUSICH, W. I. AND L. E. BABCOCK. 1998. The phylogenetic position of Echmatocrinus brachiatus, a probable octacoral from the Burgess Shale. Palaeontology, 41:193-202.
11. AUSICH, W. I. AND L. E. BABCOCK. 2000. Echmatocrinus, a Burgess Shale animal reconsidered. Lethaia, 33:92-94.
12. AUSICH, W. I. AND T. K. BAUMILLER. 1998. Disarticulation patterns in Ordovician crinoids: Implications for the evolutionary history of connective tissue in the Crinoidea. Lethaia, 31:113-123.
13. BATHER, F. A. 1900. The echinoderms, p. 1-216. In E. R. Lankester (ed.), A Treatise On Zoology, pt. 3, Adams and Charles Black, London.
14. BERG-MADSEN, V. 1986. Middle Cambrian cystoid (sensu lato) stem columnals from Bornholm, Denmark. Lethaia, 19:67-80.
15. BOCKELIE, J. F. 1982. Morphology, growth and taxonomy of the Ordovician rhombiferan Caryocystites. Geoloiska Foreningens I Stockholm Forhandlinger, 103:499-513.
16. BOTTJER, D. J., J. W. HAGADORN, AND S. Q. DORNBOS. 2000. The Cambrian substrate revolution. GSA Today, 10(9): 1-7.
17. BREIMER, A. AND G. UBAGHS. 1974. A critical comment on the classification of the pelmatozoam echinoderms I and II. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie voor Wetenschappen, proceedings, series B, 77:398-417.
18. BRETT, C. E. 1981. Terminology and functional morphology of attachment structures in pelmatozoan echinoderms. Lethaia, 14:343-370.
19. BROADHEAD, T. W. 1982. Reappraisal of class Eocrinoidea (Echinodermata), p. 125-131. In J. M. Lawrence (ed.), Echinoderms: Proceedings of the International Conference, Tampa Bay. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.
20. BUCH, C. L. VON. 1846 (1844). Über Cystideen eingeleitet durch die Entwicklung der Eingenthümlickeiten von Cariocrinus ornatus Say. Berichte über die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Königl.-Preuß, Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 14:89-116.
21. CLAUSEN, S. 2004. New Early Cambrian eocrinoids from the Iberian Chains (NE Spain) and their role in nonreefal benthic communities. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 97:371-379
22. CLAUSEN, S. AND A. B. SMITH. 2005. Palaeoanatomy and biological affinities of a Cambrian problematic deuterostome (Stylophora). Nature, 438:351-354.
23. CONWAY MORRIS, S. 1993. The fossil record and early evolution of the Metazoa. Nature, 361:219-225.
24. DAVID, B., B. LEFEBVRE, R. MOOI, AND R. PARSLEY. 2000. Are homalozoans echinoderms? An answer from the extraxial-axial theory. Paleobiology, 26: 529-554.
25. DEAN, J. 2005. Skeletal homologies, phylogeny and classification of the earliest asterozoan echinoderms. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 3:29-114.
26. DESTOMBES, J., H. HOLLAND, AND S. WILLEFERT. 1985. Lower Palaeozoic rocks of Morocco, p. 157-184. In C. H. Holland (ed.), Lower Palaeozoic Rocks of the World. Volume 4. Lower Palaeozoic of North-Western and West Central Africa. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
27. DONOVAN, S. K. 1986. Pelmatozoan columnals from the Ordovician of the British Isles, Pt. 1, Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society, 568 (part of volume 138): 1-68.
28. DONOVAN, S. K. 1989. The improbability of a muscular crinoid column. Lethaia, 22:307-315.
29. DONOVAN, S. K. 1990. Functional morphology of synostosial articulations in the crinoid column. Lethaia, 23:291-296.
30. DONOVAN, S. K. 1995. Pelmatozoan columnals from the Ordovician of the British Isles, Pt. 3, Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society, 597 (part of volume 149):115-193.
31. FATKA, O. AND V. KORDULE. 1990. Vyscystic ubaghsi gen. et sp. nov., imbricate eocrinoid from Czechoslovakia (Echinodermata, Middle Cambrian). Vestnik Ustredniho ustavu geologickeho, 65:315-320.
32. GEYER, G. 1989. Late Precambrian to early Middle Cambrian lithostratigraphy of southern Morocco. Beringeria, 1:115-143.
33. GEYER, G. AND E. LANDING. 1995. The Cambrian of the Moroccan Atlas regions. Beringeria, Special Issue, 2:7-46.
34. GRIMMER, J. C., N. D. HOLLAND, AND H. KUBBOIA. 1984a. The fine structure of the stalk of the pentacrinoid larva of a feather star Comanthus japonica (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Acta Zoologica, 65:41-58.
35. GRIMMER, J. C., N. D. HOLLAND, AND C. G. MESSING. 1984b. Fine structure of the stalk of the bourgueticrinid sea lily Democrinus conifer (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Marine Biology, 81:163-176.
36. GRIMMER, J. C., N. D. HOLLAND, AND I. HAYAMI. 1985. Fine structure of the stalk of an isocrinid sea lily (Metacrinus rotundus) (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Zoomorphology, 105:39-50.
37. GUENSBURG, T. E. AND J. SPRINKLE. 1997. Rhombiferans are not the ancestors of crinoids. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 29(6): A341.
38. GUENSBURG, T. E. AND J. SPRINKLE. 2000. Ecological radiation of Cambro-Ordovician echinoderms, p. 428-444. In A. Y. Zhuravlev and R. Riding (eds.), The Ecology of the Cambrian Radiation. Columbia University Press, New York.
39. GUENSBURG, T. E. AND J. SPRINKLE. 2001. Earliest crinoids: New evidence for the origin of the dominant Paleozoic echinoderms. Geology, 29:131-134.
40. GUENSBURG, T. E. AND J. SPRINKLE. 2003. The oldest known crinoids (Early Ordovician, Utah) and a new crinoid plate homology system. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 364:1-43.
41. HOLLAND, N. D., J. C. GRIMMER, AND K. WIEGMANN. 1991. The structure of the sea lily Calamocrinus diomedae, with special reference to the articulations, skeletal microstructure, symbiotic bacteria, axial organs, and stalk tissues (Crinoida, Millericrinida). Zoomorphology, 110:115-132.
42. HYMAN, L. H. 1955. Echinodermata: The Invertebrates, Volume 4. McGraw-Hill, New York, 763 p.
43. JAEKEL, O. 1901. Über Carpoideen, eine neue Klasse von Pelmatozoen. Zeit-schrift der Deutsche Geologisch Gesellschaft, 52:666-677.
44. JAEKEL, O. 1904. Über sogenannte Lobolithen. Deutsche Geologisch Gesellschaft Monatsbereichte, 56:59-63.
45. JELL, P. A., C. F. BURRETT, AND M. R. BANKS. 1985. Cambrian and Ordovician echinoderms from eastern Australia. Alcheringa, 9:183-208.
46. LEFEBVRE, B. AND O. FATKA. 2003. Palaeogeographical and palaeoecological aspects of the Cambro-Ordovician radiation of echinoderms in Gondwanan Africa and peri-Gondwanan Europe. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 195:73-97.
47. LITTLEWOOD, D. T. J., A. B. SMITH, K. A. CLOUGH, AND R. H. EMSON. 1997. The interrelationships of the echinoderm classes: Morphological and molecular evidence. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 61:409-438.
48. MACURDA, D. B. AND D. L. MEYER. 1975. The microstructure of the crinoid endoskeleton. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, 74: 1-22.
49. MOOI, R. AND B. DAVID. 1997. Skeletal homologies of echinoderms, p. 305-335. In J. A. Waters and C. G. Maples (eds.), Geobiology of Echinoderms. The Paleontological Society Papers, 3.
50. MOORE, R. C., R. M. JEFFORDS, AND T. H. MILLER. 1968. Morphological features of crinoid columns. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Echinodermata, 8:1-30.
51. PAUL, C. R. C. AND A. B. SMITH. 1984. The early radiation and phylogeny of echinoderms. Biological Reviews, 59:443-481.
52. PORTER, S. M. 2004. Halkieriids in Middle Cambrian phosphatic limestones from Australia. Journal of Paleontology, 78:574-590.
53. PROKOP, R. 1962. Akadocrinus nov. gen., nova lilijice z jineckého kambria (Eocrinoidea). Vestnik Ustredniho ustavu geologického, 27:31-39.
54. ROUX, M. 1975. Microstructural analysis of the crinoid stem. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, 75:1-7.
55. SEVASTOPULO, G. D. AND J. B. KEEGAN. 1980. A technique for revealing the stereom microstructure of fossil crinoids. Palaeontology, 23:749-756.
56. SMITH, A. B. 1980. Stereom microstructure of the echinoid test. Special Papers in Palaeontology, 25:1-81.
57. SMITH, A. B. 1984. Classification of the Echinodermata. Palaeontology, 27: 431-459.
58. SMITH, A. B. 1988. Patterns of diversification and extinction in early Palaeozoic echinoderms. Palaeontology, 31:799-828.
59. SMITH, A. B. 1990. Biomineralization in echinoderms, p. 413-443. In J. G. Carter (ed.), Skeletal Biomineralization: Patterns, Processes, and Evolutionary Trends. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
60. SMITH, A. B. AND P. A. JELL. 1990. Cambrian edrioasteroids from Australia and the origin of starfishes. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 28:715-778.
61. SMITH, A. B., K. J. PETERSON, G. WRAY, AND D. T. J. LITTLEWOOD. 2004. From bilateral symmetry to pentaradiality. The phylogeny of hemichordates and echinoderms, p. 365-383. In J. Cracraft and M. J. Donoghue (eds.), Assembling the Tree of Life. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
62. SPRINKLE, J. 1973. Morphology and evolution of blastozoan echinoderms. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Special Publication, 283 p.
63. SPRINKLE, J. 1976. Classification and phylogeny of "pelmatozoan" echinoderms. Systematic Zoology, 25:83-91.
64. SPRINKLE, J. 1995. Do eocrinoids belong to the Cambrian or to the Paleozoic evolutionary fauna?, p. 397-400. In J. D. Cooper, M. L. Droser, and S. C. Finney (eds.), Ordovician Odyssey: Short Papers for the Seventh International Symposium on the Ordovician System. SEPM Pacific Section, Fullerton, California.
65. SPRINKLE, J. AND R. C. MOORE. 1978. Echmatocrinea, p. T405-T407. In R. C. Moore and C. Teichert (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. T, Echinodermata 2. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.
66. SPRINKLEz, J. AND D. COLLINS. 1998. Revision of Echmatocrinus from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale of British Columbia. Lethaia, 31:269-282.
67. THORAL, M. 1935. Contribution à l'étude paléontologique de l'Ordovicien inférieur de la Montagne Noire et révision sommaire de la faune cambrienne de la Montagne Noire. Thèses Présentées a la Faculté des Sciences de l'Université de Paris, série A, 1541, 363 p.
68. UBAGHS, G. 1960. Le genre Lingulocystis Thoral (Echinodermata, Eocrinoidea) avec des remarques critiques sur la position systematique du genre Rhipidocystis Jaekel. Annales de Paleontologie, 46:81-116.
69. UBAGHS, G. 1967. Eocrinoidea, p. S455-S495. In R. C. Moore (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. S, Echinodermata 1. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Boulder.
70. UBAGHS, G. 1978. Skeletal morphology of fossil crinoids, p. T58-T216. In R. C. Moore and C. Teichert (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. T, Echinodermata 2. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Boulder.
71. UBAGHS, G. 1998. Echinodermes nouveaux du Cambrien supérieur de la Montagne Noires (France méridionale). Geobios, 31:809-829.
72. ULRICH, E. O. 1929. Trachelocrinus, a new genus of Upper Cambrian crinoids. Journal of the Washington Academy of Science, 19:63-66.
73. VAN LOOY, J. 1985. Het kaartblad Tazenakht 1/100.000, Anti-Atlas, Marokko. Kartiering, Lithostratigrafie, Biostratigrafie van Precambrium tot Tremadoc. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Katholic University of Leuven, Leuven, 198 p.
74. YAKOVLEV, N. N. 1956. Pervaya Nakhodka morskoy lilii v Kembrii SSSR. Doklady Akademii nauk SSSR, 108:726-727.