Direct Informed Assessment: Frequency of Use in Preservice Teacher Education Programs within a Five-State Region

Action in Teacher Education

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 30-38

  Briggs, Connie ^a   Tully, Beverley ^b   Stiefer, Toni ^b  

^a EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SOUTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 47949107500     PISSN: 01626620     EISSN: 21586098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01626620.1998.10462923     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Brown, C. S., and Lytle, S. L., 1988. “ Merging assessment and instruction: Protocols in the classroom ”. In Reexamining reading diagnosis: New trends and procedures, Edited by: Glazer, S. M., Searfoss, L. W., and Gentile, L. M., 94–102. Newark, Del.: International Reading Association.
2. Calfee, R., and Hiebert, E., 1991. “ Classroom assessment of reading ”. In Handbook of reading research, Edited by: Barr, R., Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P., and Pearson, P. D., vol. 2, 281–309. White Plains, NY: Longman Publishers.
3. Cannell, J. J., 1987. National norm-referenced elementary achievement testing in America's public schools: How all fifty state are above the national average, Charleston, W.V.: Friends of Education.
4. Carbo, M., 1988. What reading tests should measure to increase literacy in the U.S. Phi Delta Kappan Research Bulletin, 7: 8–9. 11
5. Darling-Hammond, L., and Wise, A. E., 1985. Beyond standardization: State standards and school improvement. The Elementary School Journal, 85: 315–336.
6. Farr, R., 1992. Putting it all together: Solving the reading assessment puzzle. The Reading Teacher, 46: 26–37.
7. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Phillips, N. B., and Bentz, J., 1994. Classwide curriculum-based measurement: Helping general educators meet the challenge of student diversity. Exceptional Children, 60: 518–537.
8. Goodman, Y. M., 1989. “ Evaluation of students: Srehcaet fo noitaulave ”. In The whole language evaluation book, Edited by: Goodman, K. S., Goodman, Y. M., and Hood, W. J., 3–14. Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.
9. Haertel, E., 1990. “ Student achievement tests as tools of educational policy: Practices and consequences ”. In Test policy and performance: Education, language, and culture, Edited by: Gifford, B. R., 13–14. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
10. Harker, W. J., 1990. “ Testing reading: We need a new perspective ”. In Reading Horizons, Summer 309–319.
11. Henk, W. A., 1987. Reading assessments of the future: Toward precision diagnosis. The Reading Teacher, 40: 860–973.
12. Henk, W. A., and Rickelman, R. J., 1992. Trends in statewide reading assessments: A closer look. Reading Horizons, 33: 67–82.
13. Hodges, C. A., 1997. How valid and useful are alternative assessments for decision-making in primary grade classrooms?. Reading Research & Instruction, 36: 157–173.
14. Johnston, P., 1992. Nontechnical assessment. The Reading Teacher, 46: 60–62.
15. Kapinus, B. A., Collier, G. V., and Kruglanski, H., 1994. “ The Maryland School performance assessment program: A new view of assessment ”. In Authentic reading assessment: Practices and possibilities, Edited by: Valencia, S. W., Hiebert, E. H., and Afflerbach, P. P., 255–276. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
16. Marzano, R. J., 1994. Lessons from the field about outcome-based performance assessments. Educational Leadership, 51 (6): 44–50.
17. McNeil, L. M., 1988. Contradictions of control. Phi Delta Kappan, 69: 478–485.
18. Perrone, V., 1991. “ Introduction ”. In Expanding student assessment, Edited by: Perrone, V., viiiAlexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
19. Shepard, L. A., 1989. Why we need better assessments. Educational Leadership, 46 (7): 4–9.
20. Smith, J. K., 1994. “ Standardized testing verses authentic assessment: Godzilla meets Winnie-the-Pooh ”. In Integrated language arts: Controversy to consensus, Edited by: Morrow, L. M., Smith, J. K., and Wilkinson, L. C., 215–229. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
21. Sugarman, J., Allen, J., and Keller-Cogan, M., 1993. Make authentic assessment work for you. Instructor, 103: 66–68.
22. Teale, W. H., 1988. Developmentally appropriate assessment of reading and writing in the early childhood classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 89: 173–183.
23. Tompkins, G. E., 1997. Literacy for the 21st century: A balanced approach, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
24. Valencia, S. W., and Pearson, P. D., 1987. Reading assessment: Time for a change. The Reading Teacher, 40: 726–732.
25. Walker, B. J., 1996. Diagnostic teaching of reading: Techniques for instruction and assessment, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
26. Weaver, C., 1994. Reading process and practice: From socio-psycholinguistics to whole language, Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.
27. Wiggins, G., 1990. The case for authentic assessment, Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse. (ED328611)
28. Winograd, P., Paris, S., and Bridge, C., 1991. Improving the assessment of literacy. The Reading Teacher, 45: 108–116.
29. Wolf, P. K., 1993. From informal to informed assessment: Recognizing the role of the classroom teacher. Journal of Reading, 36: 518–523.