Electronic state of the dimethyl sulfoxide reductase active site

Inorganic Chemistry

Volumn 47, Issue 13, 2008, Pages 5546-5548

  Hofmann, Matthias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIMETHYL SULFOXIDE REDUCTASE; IRON SULFUR PROTEIN; OXIDOREDUCTASE;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHEMISTRY; ELECTRON; THEORETICAL MODEL; THERMODYNAMICS;

BINDING SITES; ELECTRONS; IRON-SULFUR PROTEINS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OXIDOREDUCTASES; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 47949105982     PISSN: 00201669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ic800519d     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Hille, R. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 2757.
2. Li, H.-K.; Schindelin, H. In Handbook of Metalloproteins, 2nd ed.;Messerschmidt, A., Huber, R., Wieghardt, K., Poulos, T. Eds.; Wiley: Chichester, U.K., 2001; Vol. 1048.
3. Lim, B. S.; Sung, K.-K.; Holm, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7410.
4. Lim, B. S.; Donahue, J. P.; Holm, R. H. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 263.
5. Lim, B. S.; Holm, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1920.
6. Enemark, J. H.; Cooney, J. J. A.; Wang, J.-J.; Holm, R. H. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 1175.
7. Webster, C. E.; Hall, M. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5820.
8. Thapper, A.; Deeth, R. J.; Nordlander, E. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 6695.
9. McNamara, J. P.; Hillier, I. H.; Bhachub, T. S.; Garner, C. D. Dalton Trans. 2006, 3572.
10. Kaupp, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 546.
11. McAlpine, A. S.; McEwan, A. G.; Shaw, A. L.; Bailey, S. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 2, 690.
12. McAlpine, A. S.; McEwan, A. G.; Bailey, S. J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 275, 613.
13. Li, H.-K.; Temple, C.; Rajagopalan, K. V.; Schindelin, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7673.
14. Vallee, B. L.; Williams, R. J. P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1968, 59, 498.
15. Williams, R. J. P. Inorg. Chim. Acta, Rev. 1971, 5, 137.
16. Williams, R. J. P. J. Mol. Catal. 1985, 30, 1.
17. Williams, R. J. P. Eur. J. Biochem. 1995, 234, 363.
18. Leopoldini, M.; Russo, N.; Toscano, M.; Dulak, M.; Wesolowski, T. A. Chem. - Eur. J. 2006, 12, 2532.
19. 2 values between 2.010 and 2.034 resulted for the latter, indicating pure triplet states without significant spin contaminations. See the Supporting Information for a more detailed description of the computational methods and for additional benchmark calculations.
20. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.; Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.; Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.; Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 03, revision B.03; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 2003.
21. 4.
22. B3LYP was observed before to favor triplet states too much as compared to ab initio methods. For example, see: Graham, D. C.; Beran, G. J. O.; Head-Gordon, M.; Christian, G.; Stranger, R.; Yates, B. F. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 6762-6772.
23. Hofmann, M. THEOCHEM 2006, 773, 59-70.
24. Unfortunately, there are no good quality structural data available for the active site in the enzyme, on which additional computations could be based. Crystals that were used for X-ray structure determinations are now believed to have contained mixtures of active and inactive enzyme but were interpreted for a single species (see ref 10). Resonance Raman and EXAFS spectroscopies provide evidence that the X-ray bond differences are incorrect, (a) George, G. N.; Hilton, J.; Rajagopalan, K. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1113-1117.
25. (b) George, G. N.; Hilton, J.; Temple, C.; Prince, R. C.; Rajagopalan, K. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1256-1266.
26. (c) Baugh, P. E.; Garner, C. D.; Charnock, J. M.; Collison, D.; Davies, E. S.; McAlpine, A. S.; Bailey, S.; Lane, I.; Hanson, G. R.; McEwan, A. G. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 2, 634-643.
27. The ligand twist significantly reduces singlet-triplet splittings (see Scheme 2), and further distortions might be supportive.
28. Schröder, D.; Shaik, S.; Schwarz, H. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 139.