Effect of radius versus rotation speed in artificial gravity

Journal of Vestibular Research: Equilibrium and Orientation

Volumn 17, Issue 5-6, 2007, Pages 333-346

  Holly, Jan E ^a  

^a Health Services and Department of Biology   (United States)

Author keywords

Model; Perception; Self motion; Vestibular

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION DISTURBANCE; CONFERENCE PAPER; DISORIENTATION; GRAVITY; HEAD MOVEMENT; HUMAN; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIUS; ROTATION;

CENTRIFUGATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GRAVITY, ALTERED; HEAD MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; PERCEPTION; ROTATION;

EID: 47949098212     PISSN: 09574271     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. W. Bles, Coriolis effects and motion sickness modelling, Brain Research Bulletin 47 (1998), 543-549.
2. J. Borah, L.R. Young and R.E. Curry, Optimal estimator model for human spatial orientation, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 545 (1988), 51-73.
3. J.E. Bos and W. Bles, Modelling motion sickness and subjective vertical mismatch detailed for vertical motions, Brain Research Bulletin 47 (1998), 537-542.
4. J.E. Bos and W. Bles, Theoretical considerations on canalotolith interaction and an observer model, Biological Cybernetics 86 (2002), 191-207.
5. G. Clément, S.T. Moore, T. Raphan and B. Cohen, Perception of tilt (somatogravic illusion) in response to sustained linear acceleration during space flight, Experimental Brain Research 138 (2001), 410-418.
6. I.S. Curthoys, The delay of the oculogravic illusion, Brain Research Bulletin 40 (1996), 407-412.
7. P. DiZio, J.R. Lackner and J.N. Evanoff, The influence of gravitoinertial force level on oculomotor and perceptual responses to coriolis, cross-coupling stimulation, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 58 (1987), A218-A223.
8. J. Droulez and C. Darlot, The geometric and dynamic implications of the coherence constraints in three-dimensional sensorimotor interactions, in: Attention and Performance, M. Jeannerod, ed., Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1989, pp. 495-526.
9. S. Glasauer and D.M. Merfeld, Modelling three-dimensional vestibular responses during complex motion stimulation, in: Three-dimensional Kinematics of Eye, Head and Limb Movements, M. Fetter, T. Haslwanter, H. Misslich and D. Tweed, eds, Harwood, Reading, 1997, pp. 387-398.
10. A. Graybiel and R.H. Brown, The delay in visual reorientation following exposure to a change in direction of resultant force on a human centrifuge, The Journal of General Psychology 45 (1951), 143-150.
11. A. Graybiel, E.F. Miller II and J.L. Homick, Individual differences in susceptibility to motion sickness among six Skylab astronauts, Acta Astronautica 2 (1975), 155-174.
12. A. Graybiel, E.F. Miller and J.L. Homick, Experiment M131. Human vestibular function, in: Biomedical Results from Skylab, (Section II), R.S. Johnston and L.F. Dietlein, eds, NASA SP-377, US Government Printing Office, 1977, pp. 74-103.
13. J.J. Groen, The problems of the spinning top applied to the semi-circular canals, Confin Neurol 21 (1961), 454-455.
14. F.E. Guedry, Jr., Psychophysics of vestibular sensation, in: Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Volume VI, H.H. Kornhuber, ed., Springer, Berlin, 1974, pp. 3-154.
15. F.E. Guedry Jr. and A.J. Benson, Coriolis cross-coupling effects: disorienting and nauseogenic or not? Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 49 (1978), 29-35.
16. F.E. Guedry, A.H. Rupert, B.J. McGrath and C.M. Oman, The dynamics of spatial orientation during complex and changing linear and angular acceleration, Journal of Vestibular Research 2 (1992), 259-283.
17. T. Haslwanter, R. Jaeger, S. Mayr and M. Fetter, Three-dimensional eye-movement responses to off-vertical axis rotations in humans, Experimental Brain Research 134 (2000), 96-106.
18. H. Hecht, J. Kavelaars, C.C. Cheung and L.R. Young, Orientation illusions and heart-rate changes during short-radius centrifugation, Journal of Vestibular Research 11 (2001), 115-127.
19. W.C. Hixson, J.I. Niven and M.J. Correia, Kinematics Nomenclature for Physiological Accelerations, Monograph 14. Pensacola, Naval Aerospace Medical Institute, Florida, 1966.
20. J.E. Holly, Subject-coincident coordinate systems and sustained motions, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 35 (1996), 445-473.
21. J.E. Holly, Three-dimensional baselines for perceived self-motion during acceleration and deceleration in a centrifuge, Journal of Vestibular Research 7 (1997), 45-61.
22. J.E. Holly, Baselines for three-dimensional perception of combined linear and angular self-motion with changing rotational axis, Journal of Vestibular Research 10 (2000), 163-178.
23. J.E. Holly, Perceptual disturbances predicted in zero-g through three-dimensional modeling, Journal of Vestibular Research 13 (2003), 173-186.
24. J.E. Holly, Vestibular coriolis effect differences modeled with three-dimensional linear-angular interactions, Journal of Vestibular Research 14 (2004), 443-460.
25. N. Isu, M. Yanagihara, T. Mikuni and J. Koo, Coriolis effects are principally caused by gyroscopic angular acceleration, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 65 (1994), 627-631.
26. N. Isu, M. Yanagihara, S. Yoneda, K. Hattori and J. Koo, The severity of nauseogenic effect of cross-coupled rotation is proportional to gyroscopic angular acceleration, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 67 (1996), 325-332.
27. K. Kushiro, M. Dai, M. Kunin, S.B. Yakushin, B. Cohen and T. Raphan, Compensatory and orienting eye movements induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) in monkeys, Journal of Neurophysiology 88 (2002), 2445-2462.
28. J.R. Lackner and A. Graybiel, The effective intensity of coriolis, cross-coupling stimulation is gravitoinertial force dependent: implications for space motion sickness, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 57 (1986), 229-235.
29. G. Melvill Jones, Origin significance and amelioration of coriolis illusions from the semicircular canals: a non-mathematical appraisal, Aerospace Medicine 41 (1970), 483-490.
30. D.M. Merfeld, Modeling human vestibular responses during eccentric rotation and off vertical axis rotation, Acta Oto-Laryngologica, S520 (1995), 354-359.
31. D.M. Merfeld, Modeling the vestibulo-ocular reflex of the squirrel monkey during eccentric rotation and roll tilt, Experimental Brain Research 106 (1995), 123-134.
32. D.M. Merfeld, L.R. Young, C.M. Oman and M.J. Shelhamer, A multidimensional model of the effect of gravity on the spatial orientation of the monkey, Journal of Vestibular Research 3 (1993), 141-161.
33. T. Mergner and S. Glasauer, A simple model of vestibular canal-otolith signal fusion, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 871 (1999), 430-434.
34. H. Mittelstaedt, Somatic graviception, Biological Psychology 42 (1996), 53-74.
35. S.T. Moore, G. Clément, M. Dai, T. Raphan, D. Solomon and B. Cohen, Ocular and perceptual responses to linear acceleration in microgravity: Alterations in otolith function on the COSMOS and Neurolab flights, Journal of Vestibular Research 13 (2003), 377-393.
36. C.M. Oman, A heuristic mathematical model for the dynamics of sensory conflict and motion sickness, Acta Oto-Laryngologica S392 (1982), 1-44.
37. C.C. Ormsby and L.R. Young, Integration of semicircular canal and otolith information for multisensory orientation stimuli, Mathematical Biosciences 34 (1977), 1-21.
38. G. Reymond, J. Droulez and A. Kemeny, Visuovestibular perception of self-motion modeled as a dynamic optimization process, Biological Cybernetics 87 (2002), 301-314.
39. P.D. Woodman and M.J. Griffin, Effect of direction of head movement on motion sickness caused by coriolis stimulation, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 68 (1997), 93-98.
40. L.H. Zupan, D.M. Merfeld and C. Darlot, Using sensory weighting to model the influence of canal, otolith and visual cues on spatial orientation and eye movements, Biological Cybernetics 86 (2002), 209-230.