Vestibular coriolis effect differences modeled with three-dimensional linear-angular interactions

Journal of Vestibular Research: Equilibrium and Orientation

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 443-460

  Holly, Jan E ^a  

^a Health Services and Department of Biology   (United States)

Author keywords

Cross coupling; Motion sickness; Perception; Self motion; Zero g

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ARTICLE; CORIOLIS PHENOMENON; CROSS COUPLING REACTION; DECELERATION; HEAD TILTING; MOTION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VESTIBULAR SYSTEM; VESTIBULOOCULAR REFLEX;

ALGORITHMS; BIOPHYSICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORIOLIS FORCE; GRAVITY PERCEPTION; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOTION SICKNESS; VESTIBULE;

EID: 15244340426     PISSN: 09574271     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. D. Angelaki and B.J.M. Hess, Inertial representation of angular motion in the vestibular system of rhesus monkeys, I. Vestibulo-ocular reflex, J. Neurophysiol. 71 (1994), 1222-1249.
2. D.E. Angelaki, D.M. Merfeld and B.J.M. Hess, Low-frequency otolith and semicircular canal interactions after canal inactivation, Experimental Brain Research 132 (2000), 539-549.
3. D.E. Angelaki, M. Wei and D.M. Merfeld, Vestibular discrimination of gravity and translational acceleration, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 942 (2001), 114-127.
4. J. Baker, J. Goldberg, G. Hermann and B. Peterson, Spatial and temporal response properties of secondary neurons that receive convergent input in vestibular nuclei of alert cats, Brain Research 294 (1984), 138-143.
5. W. Bles, Coriolis effects and motion sickness modelling, Brain Research Bulletin 47 (1998), 543-549.
6. J. Borah, L.R. Young and R.E. Curry, Optimal estimator model for human spatial orientation, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 545 (1988), 51-73.
7. J.E. Bos and W. Bles, Modelling motion sickness and subjective vertical mismatch detailed for vertical motions, Brain Research Bulletin 47 (1998), 537-542.
8. J.E. Bos and W. Bles, Theoretical considerations on canalotolith interaction and an observer model, Biological Cybernetics 86 (2002), 191-207.
9. B. Clark and A. Graybiel, Factors contributing to the delay in the perception of the oculogravic illusion, American Journal of Psychology 79 (1966), 377-388.
10. I.S. Curthoys, The delay of the oculogravic illusion, Brain Research Bulletin 40 (1996), 407-412.
11. I.S. Curthoys and C.H. Markham, Convergence of labyrinthine influences on units in the vestibular nuclei of the cat, I. Natural stimulation, Brain Research 35 (1971), 469-490.
12. J.D. Dickman and D.E. Angelaki, Vestibular convergence patterns in vestibular nuclei neurons of alert primates, J. Neurophysiol. 88 (2002), 3518-3533.
13. P. DiZio, J.R. Lackner and J.N. Evanoff, The influence of gravitoinertial force level on oculomotor and perceptual responses to sudden stop stimulation, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 58 (1987), A224-A230.
14. J. Droulez and C. Darlot, The geometric and dynamic implications of the coherence constraints in three-dimensional sensorimotor interactions, in: Attention and Performance, M. Jeannerod, ed., Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1989, pp. 495-526.
15. S. Glasauer, Interaction of semicircular canals and otoliths in the processing structure of the subjective zenith, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 656 (1992), 847-849.
16. S. Glasauer, Human spatial orientation during centrifuge experiments: Non-linear interaction of semicircular canals and otoliths, in: Proc. XVIIth Barany Society Meeting (Prague 1992), H. Krejcova and J. Jerabek, eds, 1993, pp. 48-52.
17. S. Glasauer and D.M. Merfeld, Modelling three-dimensional vestibular responses during complex motion stimulation, in: Three-Dimensional Kinematics of Eye, Head and Limb Movements, M. Fetter, T. Haslwanter, H. Misslich and D. Tweed, eds, Harwood, Reading, 1997, pp. 387-398.
18. A. Graybiel and R.H. Brown, The delay in visual reorientation following exposure to a change in direction of resultant force on a human centrifuge, The Journal of General Psychology 45 (1951), 143-150.
19. A. Graybiel, E.F. Miller II. and J.L. Homick, Individual differences in susceptibility to motion sickness among six Skylab astronauts, Acta Astronautica 2 (1975), 155-174.
20. A. Graybiel, E.F. Miller and J.L. Homick, Experiment M131. Human vestibular function, in: Biomedical Results from Skylab, (Section II), R.S. Johnston and L.F. Dietlein, eds, NASA SP-377, US. Government Printing Office, 1977, pp. 74-103.
21. J.J. Groen, The problems of the spinning top applied to the semi-circular canals, Confin. neurol. 21 (1961), 454-455.
22. F.E. Guedry, Jr., Psychophysics of vestibular sensation, in: Handbook of Sensory Physiology, (Vol. VI), H.H. Kornhuber, ed., Springer, Berlin, 1974, pp. 3-154.
23. F.E. Guedry, Jr. and A.J. Benson, Coriolis cross-coupling effects: disorienting and nauseogenic or not? Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 49 (1978), 29-35.
24. F.E. Guedry, A.H. Rupert, B.J. McGrath and C.M. Oman, The dynamics of spatial orientation during complex and changing linear and angular acceleration, Journal of Vestibular Research 2 (1992), 259-283.
25. F.E. Guedry, Jr., C.W. Stockwell and R.D. Gilson, Comparison of subjective responses to semicircular canal stimulation produced by rotation about different axes, Acta Otolaryng 72 (1971), 101-106.
26. H. Hecht, J. Kavelaars, C.C. Cheung and L.R. Young, Orientation illusions and heart-rate changes during short-radius centrifugation, Journal of Vestibular Research 11 (2001), 115-127.
27. W.C. Hixson, J.I. Niven and M.J. Correia, Kinematics Nomenclature for Physiological Accelerations, Monograph 14, Pensacola, Naval Aerospace Medical Institute, Florida, 1966.
28. J.E. Holly, Subject-coincident coordinate systems and sustained motions, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 35 (1996), 445-473.
29. J.E. Holly, Three-dimensional baselines for perceived self-motion during acceleration and deceleration in a centrifuge, Journal of Vestibular Research 7 (1997), 45-61.
30. J.E. Holly, Baselines for three-dimensional perception of combined linear and angular self-motion with changing rotational axis, Journal of Vestibular Research 10 (2000), 163-178.
31. J.E. Holly, Perceptual disturbances predicted in zero-g through three-dimensional modeling, Journal of Vestibular Research 13 (2003), 173-186.
32. N. Isu, M. Yanagihara, T. Mikuni and J. Koo, Coriolis effects are principally caused by gyroscopic angular acceleration, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 65 (1994), 627-631.
33. N. Isu, M. Yanagihara, S. Yoneda, K. Hattori and J. Koo, The severity of nauseogenic effect of cross-coupled rotation is proportional to gyroscopic angular acceleration, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 67 (1996), 325-332.
34. K. Kushiro, M. Dai, M. Kunin, S.B. Yakushin, B. Cohen and T. Raphan, Compensatory and orienting eye movements induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) in monkeys, Journal of Neurophysiology 88 (2002), 2445-2462.
35. J.R. Lackner and P. DiZio, Multisensory, cognitive, and motor influences on human spatial orientation in weightlessness, Journal of Vestibular Research 3 (1993), 361-372.
36. J.R. Lackner and A. Graybiel, The effective intensity of coriolis, cross-coupling stimulation is gravitoinertial force dependent: implications for space motion sickness, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 57 (1986), 229-235.
37. V.V. Marlinsky, Vestibular and vestibulo-proprioceptive perception of motion in the horizontal plane in blindfolded man - I, Estimations of linear displacement, Neuroscience 90 (1999), 389-394.
38. G. Melvill Jones, Origin significance and amelioration of coriolis illusions from the semicircular canals: a non-mathematical appraisal, Aerospace Medicine 41 (1970), 483-490.
39. D.M. Merfeld, Modeling human vestibular responses during eccentric rotation and off vertical axis rotation, Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Supplement 520 (1995), 354-359.
40. D.M. Merfeld, Modeling the vestibulo-ocular reflex of the squirrel monkey during eccentric rotation and roll tilt, Experimental Brain Research 106 (1995), 123-134.
41. D.M. Merfeld, L.R. Young, C.M. Oman and M.J. Shelhamer, A multidimensional model of the effect of gravity on the spatial orientation of the monkey, Journal of Vestibular Research 3 (1993), 141-161.
42. D.M. Merfeld, L. Young, G. Paige and D. Tomko, Three dimensional eye movements of squirrel monkeys following postrotatory tilt, Journal of Vestibular Research 3 (1993), 123-139.
43. D.M. Merfeld and L.H. Zupan, Neural processing of gravitoinertial cues in humans, III. Modeling tilt and translation responses, Journal of Neurophysiology 87 (2002), 819-833.
44. D.M. Merfeld, L. Zupan and R.J. Peterka, Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration, Nature 398 (1999), 615-618.
45. T. Mergner and S. Glasauer, A simple model of vestibular canal-otolith signal fusion, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 871 (1999), 430-434.
46. M-L. Mittelstaedt and H. Mittelstaedt, The influence of otoliths and somatic graviceptors on angular velocity estimation, Journal of Vestibular Research 6 (1996), 355-366.
47. C.M. Oman, A heuristic mathematical model for the dynamics of sensory conflict and motion sickness, Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Supplement 392 (1982), 1-44.
48. C.C. Ormsby and L.R. Young, Integration of semicircular canal and otolith information for multisensory orientation stimuli, Mathematical Biosciences 34 (1977), 1-21.
49. A.A. Perachio, G.A. Bush and D.E. Angelaki, A model of responses of horizontal-canal-related vestibular nuclei neurons that respond to linear head acceleration, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 656 (1992), 795-801.
50. T. Raphan and B. Cohen, The vestibulo-ocular reflex in three dimensions. Experimental Brain Research 145 (2002), 1-27.
51. T. Raphan and D. Sturm, Modeling the spatiotemporal organization of velocity storage in the vestibuloocular reflex by optokinetic studies, Journal of Neurophysiology 66 (1991), 1410-1421.
52. G. Reymond, J. Droulez and A. Kemeny, Visuovestibular perception of self-motion modeled as a dynamic optimization process, Biological Cybernetics 87 (2002), 301-314.
53. E.J. Searles and C.D. Barnes, Ipsilateral utricular and semicircular canal interactions from electrical stimulation of individual vestibular nerve branches recorded in the descending medial longitudinal fasciculus, Brain Research 125 (1977), 23-36.
54. S.H. Seidman, G. Bush, G.D. Paige and D.L. Tomko, Perception of translational motion in the absence of non-otolith cues, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 24(Part 1) (1998), 416.
55. S.H. Seidman, L. Telford and G.D. Paige, Tilt perception during dynamic linear acceleration, Experimental Brain Research 119 (1998), 307-314.
56. S. Wearne, T. Raphan and B. Cohen, Effects of tilt of the gravito-inertial acceleration vector on the angular vestibuloocular reflex during centrifugation, Journal of Neurophysiology 81 (1999), 2175-2190.
57. L.R. Young, Perception of the body in space: mechanisms, in: Handbook of Physiology, (Vol. III) (Sensory Processes, Part 2), I. Darian-Smith, ed., American Physiological Society, Bethesda, Maryland, 1984, pp. 1023-1066.
58. L.R. Young and J.L. Meiry, A revised dynamic otolith model, Aerospace Medicine 39 (1968), 606-608.
59. L.H. Zupan, D.M. Merfeld and C. Darlot, Using sensory weighting to model the influence of canal, otolith and visual cues on spatial orientation and eye movements, Biological Cybernetics 86 (2002), 209-230.