On reducing control to movement

Syntax

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 125-143

  Bowers, John ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 47949096929     PISSN: 13680005     EISSN: 14679612     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9612.2008.00103.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Boeckx, C. & Hornstein, N. 2004. Movement under control. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 431-452.
2. Bošković, Ž. 1997. The syntax of nonfinite complementation: An economy approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Boškoviá, Ž. 2002. A-movement and the EPP. Syntax 5: 167-218.
4. Bowers, J. 1973/1986. Grammatical relations. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA. [Published by Garland, New York, 1986.]
5. Bowers, J. 1981. The theory of grammatical relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
6. Bowers, J. 1993. The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 591-656.
7. Bowers, J. 2001a. Predication. In The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, ed. M. Baltin & C. Collins, 299-333. Blackwell, Oxford.
8. Bowers, J. 2001b. Syntactic relations. Ms., Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
9. Bowers, J. 2002. Transitivity. Linguistic Inquiry 33 (2): 183-224.
10. Bowers, J. & Reichenbach, U. K. H. 1979. Montague Grammar and transformational grammar: A review of Formal philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague. Linguistic Analysis 5: 195-246.
11. Chomsky, N. 1955/1975. The logical structure of linguistic theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
13. Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Chomsky, N. 2000. Minimalist inquiries. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka, 89-155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Chomsky, N. 2001a. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. M. Kenstowicz, 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Chomsky, N. 2001b. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 20. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
18. Collins, C. 2003. Eliminating labels. In Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program, ed. Epstein, S. D. & Seely, T. D. 42-61. Oxford: Blackwell.
19. Epstein, S. D. 1994. The derivation of syntactic relations. Ms., Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Paper presented at the Harvard University Linguistics Department Forum in Synchronic Linguistic Theory, December.
20. Epstein, S. D., Groat, E. M., Kawashimae, R. & Kitahara, H. 1998. A derivational approach to syntactic relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Epstein, S. D. & Seely, T. D. 2006. Derivations in minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Hornstein, N. 1999. Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 69-96.
23. Hornstein, N. 2001. Move!A minimalist theory of construal. Oxford: Blackwell.
24. Kayne, R. 1984. Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris.
25. Koizumi, M. 1993. Object agreement phrases and the split VP hypothesis. In MIT working papers in linguistics 18, 99-148. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
26. Koizumi, M. 1995. Phrase structure in minimalist syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
27. Landau, I. 1999. Elements of control. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
28. Landau, I. 2003. Movement out of control. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 471-498.
29. Lasnik, H. 1999. Chains of arguments. In Working minimalism, ed. Epstein, S. D. & Hornstein, N. 189-215. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Martin, R. 1999. Case, the Extended Projection Principle, and minimalism. In Working minimalism, ed. S. D. Epstein & N. Hornstein, 1-26. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Williams, E. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 203-238.