Built-in user satisfaction - Feature appraisal and prioritization with AMUSE

Proceedings - 15th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 101-110

  Doerr, Joerg ^a   Hartkopf, Susanne ^a   Kerkow, Daniel ^a   Landmann, Dennis ^a   Amthor, Peter ^b  

^a FRAUNHOFER IESE   (Germany)

^b SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER PRODUCTS; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES; GERMANY; INTEGRAL PARTS; MEASUREMENT DEVICES; PRIORITIZATION; PRODUCT MANAGERS; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERS; REQUIREMENTS PHASE; SIEMENS AG; SYSTEM DEVELOPMENTS; SYSTEM ENGINEERINGS; TOOL SUPPORTS; USER EXPECTATIONS; USER SATISFACTIONS;

ENGINEERING;

EID: 47949084741     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/RE.2007.10     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. M.G. Morris and A. Dillon, "How User Perceptions Influence Software Use", IEEE Software, USA (Los Alamitos), vol. 14, no. 4, July/August, 1997, pp. 58-65.
2. B. Kitchenham, S. Linkman, A. Pasquini, and V. Nanni. "The SQUID approach to defining a quality model", Software Quality Control, Nov. 1997, pp. 211-233.
3. J. Boegh, S. Depanfilis, B. Kitchenham, and A. Pasquini. "A method for software quality planning, control, and evaluation", IEEE Software, Mar/Apr 1999, pp. 69-77.
4. H.-W. Jung, S.-G. Kim and C.-S. Chung, "Measuring software product quality: A survey of ISO/IEC 9126", IEEE Software, Sept/Oct 2004, pp. 88-92.
5. J. Doerr, T. Punter, J. Bayer, D. Kerkow, R. Kolb, T. Koenig, and T.Olsson, A. Trendowicz, "Quality Models for Non-functional Requirements", Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering, Kaiserslautern, Germany, IESE-Report 010.04/E, 2004.
6. M. Hassenzahl, et al., AttrakDifF™, available at http://www.attrakdiff.de/ on January 11, 2007.
7. M. Shaw, A. Arora, S. Butler, V. Poladian, and C. Scaffidi, In Search of a Unified Theory for Early Predictive Design Evaluation for Software, School of Computer Science and Institute for Software Research International, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, CMU-CS-05139/CMU-ISRI-05-114, working draft of October 24, 2005, available at http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~Compose/ iso-unif-thy-v11-4a-pub.pdf on February 8, 2007.
8. Y. Akao (Ed.), "Quality Function Deployment. QFD. Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design", Productivity Press, Portland, 1988.
9. G. Herzwurm, S. Schockert, and W. Mellis, "Qualitätssoftware durch Kundenorientierung. Die Methode Quality Function Deployment (QFD): Grundlagen, Praxis und SAP R/3 Fallbeispiel", Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1997 (German).
10. V.R. Basili, G. Caldiera, H.D. Rombach, "Goal question metric paradigm", in J. Marciniak (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, Volume 1, A-O, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2002.
11. B. Hoisl, C. Gresse, J. Wüst, "A Process Model for GQM-Based Measurement", STTI-KL, Kaiserslautern, 1995.
12. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), "ISO/IEC 9126-4:2004(E): Software Engineering-Product Quality-Part 4: Quality in use metrics", Genf, 2004.
13. J.A. McCall, P.K. Richards, G.F. Walters, "Factors in Software Quality", National Technical Information Service (NTIS), Springfield, Final Technical Report, 1977.
14. R.B. Grady, "Practical Software Metrics for Project Management and Process Improvement", Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, USA, 1992.
15. R.B. Grady and D.L. Caswell, "Software Metrics: Establishing a Company-Wide Program", Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, USA, 1987.
16. F.D. Davis, "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology", MIS Quarterly 13(3), 1989, pp. 319-340.
17. Y. Lee, K.A. Kozar, and K.R.T. Larsen, "The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future", Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Volume 12, Article 50, 2003, pp. 752-780.
18. W.J. Doll and G. Torkzadeh, "The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction: theoretical and methodological issues", MIS Quarterly, 15, 1, March, 1991, pp. 5-10.
19. B.W. Boehm, J.R. Brown, H. Kaspar, M. Lipow, G.J. MacLeod, and M.J. Merritt, "Characteristics of Software Quality". North Holland Publishing Company, 1978.
20. Pugh method or decision-matrix method, available at http://mielsvr2.ecs. umass.edu/virtual_econ/module2/pugh_method.htm on February 8, 2007.
21. M. Walmsley, Pugh Matrix: Decisions, Decisions, Decisions..., available at http://www.sixsigmafirst.com/PughMatrix.htm on February 8, 2007.
22. J. McCaffrey, "The Analytic Hierarchy Process", MSDNMagazine, (Vol. 20, No. 6), June 2005, pp. 139-144.
23. A. Toepfer, (ed.), "Kundenzufriedenheit messen und steigern", 2nd edition, Luchterhand, Neuwied, 1999. (German).
24. S.W. Pearson and J.E. Bailey, "Measurement of computer user satisfaction", SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev., 9, 1, Apr., 1980, pp. 59-68.
25. B. Ives, M.H. Olson, and J.J. Baroudi, "The Measurement of User Information Satisfaction," Communications of ACM, Vol. 26, No. 10, 1983, pp. 785-793.
26. J. P. Chin, V.A. Diehl, and K.L. Norman, K. L. "Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface", In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Washington, D.C., United States, May 15 - 19, 1988). J. J. O'Hare, Ed. CHI '88. ACM Press, New York, NY, 213-218.
27. V. Venkatesh, "Creating Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation," MIS Quarterly (23:2), 1999, pp. 239-260.
28. N. Kano, "Attractive quality and must-be quality", The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control, April 1984 pp. 39-48.
29. W.H. DeLone, E.R. McLean, Information systems success revisited, HICSS, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Jan. 2002, pp. 2966- 2976
30. J. Karlsson, K. Ryan, Prioritizing requirements using a cost-value approach, IEEE Software, vol. 14, 1997, pp. 67-74