Accurate reaching after active but not passive movements of the hand: Evidence for forward modeling

Behavioural Neurology

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 117-125

  Coslett, H Branch ^a,b,e   Buxbaum, Laurel J ^b,c   Schwoebel, John ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b MOSS REHABILITATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d OMEP The World Organization for Early Childhood Education   (United States)

^e HUP   (United States)

Author keywords

Efference copy; Forward model; Parietal; Pointing; Proprioception; Sensory loss

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; BODY POSITION; CASE REPORT; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MODEL; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOTOR PLANNING; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PLANNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; RECOGNITION; SENSORY DYSFUNCTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT;

EID: 47849125947     PISSN: 09534180     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2008/972542     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. C. Bard, Y. Turrell, M. Fleury, N. Teasdale, Y. Lamarre and O. Martin, Deafferentation and pointing with visual doublestep perturbations, Experimental Brain Research 125 (1999), 410-416.
2. S.J. Blakemore, C.D. Frith and D.W. Wolpert, Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11 (1999), 551-559.
3. M. Botvinick and J. Cohen, Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see, Nature 391 (1998), 756.
4. P. Burbaud, C. Doegle, C. Gross and B. Bioulac, Aquantitative study of neuronal discharge in areas 5, 2, and 4 of the monkey during fast arm movements, Journal of Neurophysiology 66 (1991), 429-443.
5. L.J. Buxbaum, T. Veramonti and M.F. Schwartz, Function and manipulation tool knowledge in apraxia: Knowing 'what for' but not 'how', Neurocase 6 (2000), 83-97.
6. M. Desmurget, C.M. Epstein, R.S. Turner, C. Prablanc, G.E. Alexander and S.T. Grafton, Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target, Nature Neuroscience 2 (1999), 563-567.
7. M. Desmurget and S. Grafton, Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000), 423-431.
8. M. Desmurget, H. Grea, J.S. Grethe, C. Prablanc, G.E. Alexander and S.T. Grafton, Functional anatomy of non-visual feedback loops during reaching: A positron emission tomography study, The Journal of Neuroscience 21 (2001), 2919-2928.
9. C. Farrer, N. Franck, J. Paillard and M. Jeannerod, The role of proprioception in action recognition, Consciousness and Cognition 12 (2003), 609-619.
10. P. Fourneret and M. Jeannerod, Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects, Neuropsychologia 36 (1998), 1133-2114.
11. C.D. Frith, S.J. Blakemore and D.M. Wolpert, Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 355 (2000), 1771-1788.
12. M.A. Goodale, A.D. Milner, L.S. Jakobson and D.P. Carey, A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them, Nature 349 (1991), 154-156.
13. H. Goodglass and H. Kaplan, The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders, Lea, Febiger, editors. 2nd ed: Philadelphia. 1983.
14. M.S. Graziano and M.M. Botvinick, How the brain represents the body: Insights from neurophysiology and psychology, in: Attention and Performance XIX, Common Mechanisms in.
15. Perception and Action, W. Prinz AND B. Hommell, editors., Oxford; Oxford University Press, 2002.
16. H. Grea, L. Pisella, Y. Rossetti, M. Desmurget, C. Tilikete, S. Grafton, C. Prablanc and A. Vighetto, A lesion of the posterior parietal cortex disrupts on-line adjustments during aiming movements, Neuropsychologia 40 (2002), 2471-2480.
17. M. Jeannerod, The Neural and Behavioral Organization of Goal-Directed Movements, Motor Control: Concepts and Issues. New York: Wiley, 1988.
18. J.F. Kalaska, R. Caminiti and A.P. Georgopoulos, Cortical mechanisms related to the direction of two dimensional arm movements: Relations in parietal area 5 and comparison with motor cortex, Experimental Brain Research 51 (1983), 247-260.
19. A. Karniel, Three creatures named 'forward model'. Neural Networks 15 (2002), 305-307.
20. J.R. Lackner, Some proprioceptive influences on the perceptual representation of body shape and orientation, Brain 111 (1988), 281-297.
21. H.C. Lau, R.D. Rogers, P. Haggard and P.E. Passingham, Attention to intention, Science 303 (2004), 1208-1210.
22. V.B. Mountcastle, J.C. Lynch, A. Georgopoulos, H. Sakata and C. Acuna, Posterior parietal association cortex of the monkey: Command functions for operations within extra-personal space, Journal of Neurophysiology 3 (1975), 871-908.
23. J. Paillard and G.E. Stelmach, Contribution of visual and tactile cues to pointing at proprioceptively encoded body target, in: From Basic Motor Control to Functional Recovery, N. Gantchev and G.N. Gantchev, eds, Academic Publishing House Pro. M. Drinov, Sofia, 1999, pp. 117-120.
24. A. Pick, Storung der Orientierung am Eigenen Korper, Psychologische Forschung 2 (1922), 33-318.
25. L. Pisella, H. Grea, C. Tilikete, A. Vighetto, M. Desmurget, G. Rode, D. Boisson and Y. Rossetti, An 'automatic pilot' for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia, Nature Neuroscience 3 (2000), 729-736.
26. V.S. Ramachandran and W. Hirstein, The perception of phantom limbs: The D.O. Hebb lecture, Brain 121 (1998), 1623-1630.
27. L.J.G. Rothi, A.M. Raymer, C. Ochipa, L.M. Majer, M.L. Greenwald and K.M. Heilman, Florida Apraxia Battery: Experimental Edition, 1991.
28. J. Schwoebel and H.B. Coslett, Evidence for Multiple, Distinct Representations for the Human Body, J Cognitive Neuroscience 17 (2005), 543-553.
29. J. Schwoebel, H.B. Coslett and L.J. Buxbaum, Compensatory coding of body part location in autotopagnosia: Evidence for extrinsic egocentric coding, Cognitive Neuropsychology 18 (2001), 363-381.
30. J. Seal, C.H. Gross and B. Bioulac, Activity of neurons in area 5 during a simple arm movement in monkeys before and after deafferentation of the trained limb, Brain Research 250 (1982), 229-243.
31. A. Sirigu, E. Daprati, P. Pradat-Diehl, N. Franck and M. Jeannerod, Perception of self-generated movement following left parietal lesion, Brain 22 (1999), 1867-1874.
32. A. Sirigu, J. Grafman, K. Bressler and T. Sunderland, Multiple representations contribute to body knowledge, Brain 114 (1991), 629-642.
33. M. Tsakiris and P. Haggard, The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuo tactile integration and self-attribution, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 (2005), 80-91.
34. M. Tsakiris, P. Haggard, N. Franck, N. Mainy and A. Sirigu, A specific role for efferent information in self-recognition, Cognition 96 (2005), 215-231.
35. J.F. van Sonderen, C.C.A.M. Gielen and J.J. Denier van der Gon, Motor programmes for goal-directed movements are continuously adjusted according to changes in target location, Experimental Bain Research 78 (1989), 139-146.
36. B. Wilson, J. Cockburn and P.W. Halligan, Behavioral Inattention Test, Bury St. Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company, 1987.
37. D.M. Wolpert and Z. Ghahramani, Computational principles of movement neuroscience, Nature Neuroscience 3 (2000), 1212-1217.
38. D.M. Wolpert, Computational approaches to motor control, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1 (1997), 209-216.
39. D.M. Wolpert, S.J. Goodbody and M. Husain, Maintaining internal representations: The role of the human superior parietal lobe, Nature Neuroscience 1 (1998), 529-533.
40. D.M. Wolpert, Z. Ghahramani and M.I. Jordan, An internal model for sensorimotor integration, Science 269 (1995), 1880-1882.
41. R.S. Woodworth, The accuracy of voluntary movement, Psychobiological Review (1899), (Monograph Supplement) 1-119.