Bone ingrowth into a porous coated implant predicted by a mechano-regulatory tissue differentiation algorithm

Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 335-344

  Liu, Xiangyi ^a   Niebur, Glen L ^a  

^a University of Notre Dame   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone ingrowth; Finite element; Mechanobiology; Porous coating; Tissue differentiation

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BOOLEAN FUNCTIONS; CLADDING (COATING); DIFFERENTIATION (CALCULUS); FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FORECASTING; FRACTURE FIXATION; HEALTH; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); SUGAR (SUCROSE); TISSUE;

BONE ADAPTATION; BONE FILLING; BONE FORMATION; BONE INGROWTH; BONE-IMPLANT INTERFACES; EXPERIMENTAL OBSERVATIONS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; FIBROUS TISSUE (FT); LOADING CONDITIONS; MICRO MOTION; MICROMECHANICAL FINITE ELEMENT MODEL; ORIGINAL ALGORITHMS; ORTHOPAEDIC IMPLANTS; PORE SPACES; POROUS COATINGS; POROUS SCAFFOLDS; POROUS SURFACES; SOFT TISSUES; TISSUE DIFFERENTIATION; TRANSVERSE DISPLACEMENTS;

BONE;

BIOMATERIAL;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE REGENERATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; PHYSIOLOGY; POROSITY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BONE DEVELOPMENT; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OSSEOINTEGRATION; POROSITY; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS;

EID: 47849115820     PISSN: 16177959     EISSN: 16822978     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10237-007-0100-3     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Andreykiv A, Prendergast PJ, van Keulen F, Swieszkowski W, Rozing PM (2005) Bone ingrowth simulation for a concept glenoid component design. J Biomech 38:1023-1033
2. Beaupre GS, Orr TE, Carter DR (1990) An approach for time- dependent bone modeling and remodeling-theoretical development. J Orthop Res 8:651-661
3. Beck JD, Canfield BL, Haddock SM, Chen TJH, Kothari M, Keaveny TM (1997) Three-dimensional imaging of trabecular bone using the Computer Numerically Controlled Milling technique. Bone 21:281-287
4. Burke DW, Bragdon CR, O'Connor DO, Jasty M, Harris WH (1993) Dynamic measurement of interface mechanics in-vivo and the effect of micromotions on bone in-growth into a porous surface device under controlled loads in-vivo. In: 39th Orthop Res Soc, Chicago
5. Carter DR, Hayes WC (1976) Bone compressive strength: the influence of density and strain rate. Science 194:1174-1176
6. Carter DR, Blenman PR, Beaupre GS (1988) Correlations between mechanical stress history and tissue differentiation in initial fracture healing. J Orthop Res 6:736-748
7. Claes LE, Heigele CA (1999) Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing. J Biomech 32:255-266
8. Claes LE, Heigele CA, Neidlinger-Wilke C, Kaspar D, Seidl W, Margevicius KJ, Augat P (1998) Effects of mechanical factors on the fracture healing process. Clin Orthop Relat Res S132-S147
9. Fischer KJ, Jacobs CR, Levenston ME, Carter DR (1996) Different loads can produce similar bone density distributions. Bone 19:127-135
10. Frost HM (1987) Bone "mass" and the "mechanostat": a proposal. Anat Rec 219:1-9
11. Gardner TN, Stoll T, Marks L, Mishra S, Knothe Tate M (2000) The influence of mechanical stimulus on the pattern of tissue differentiation in a long bone fracture-an FEM study. J Biomech 33:415-425
12. Hernandez CJ, Beaupre GS, Keller TS, Carter DR (2001) The influence of bone volume fraction and ash fraction on bone strength and modulus. Bone 29:74-78
13. Huiskes R, Weinans H, Grootenboer HJ, Dalstra M, Fudala B, Slooff TJ (1987) Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. J Biomech 20:1135-1150
14. Huiskes R, Weinans H, Dalstra M (1989) Adaptive bone remodeling and biomechanical design considerations for noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 12:1255-1267
15. Huiskes R, Weinans H, van Rietbergen B (1992) The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin Orthop 274:124-134
16. Huiskes R, Driel WD, Prendergast PJ, SOballe K (1997) A biomechanical regulatory model for periprosthetic fibrous-tissue differentiation. J Mater Sci Mater Med 8:785-788
17. Isaksson H, van Donkelaar CC, Huiskes R, Ito K (2006a) Corroboration of mechanoregulatory algorithms for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: Comparison with in vivo results. J Orthop Res 24:898-907
18. Isaksson H, Wilson W, van Donkelaar CC, Huiskes R, Ito K (2006b) Comparison of biophysical stimuli for mechano-regulation of tissue differentiation during fracture healing. J Biomech 39:1507-1516
19. Keaveny TM, Bartel DL (1994) Fundamental load transfer patterns for press-fit, surface-treated intramedullary fixation stems. J Biomech 27:1147-1157
20. Kelly DJ, Prendergast PJ (2004) Effect of a degraded core on the mechanical behaviour of tissue-engineered cartilage constructs: a poro-elastic finite element analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput 42:9-13
21. Kelly DJ, Prendergast PJ (2005) Mechano-regulation of stem cell differentiation and tissue regeneration in osteochondral defects. J Biomech 38:1413-1422
22. Kienapfel H, Sprey C, Wilke A, Griss P (1999) Implant fixation by bone ingrowth. J Arthroplasty 14:355-368
23. Lacroix D, Prendergast PJ (2002) A mechano-regulation model for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: analysis of gap size and loading. J Biomech 35:1163-1171
24. Lacroix D, Prendergast PJ, Li G, Marsh D (2002) Biomechanical model to simulate tissue differentiation and bone regeneration: application to fracture healing. Med Biol Eng Comput 40:14-21
25. Loboa EG, Wren TAL, Beaupre GS, Carter DR (2003) Mechanobiology of soft skeletal tissue differentiation-a computational approach of a fiber-reinforced poroelastic model based on homogeneous and isotropic simplifications. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2:83-96
26. Prendergast PJ, Huiskes R, Soballe K (1997) Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces. J Biomech 30:539-548
27. Qin YX, McLeod KJ, Guilak F, Chiang FP, Rubin CT (1996) Correlation of bony ingrowth to the distribution of stress and strain parameters surrounding a porous-coated implant. J Orthop Res 14:862-870
28. Ramamurti BS, Orr TE, Bragdon CR, Lowenstein JD, Jasty M, Harris WH (1997) Factors influencing stability at the interface between a porous surface and cancellous bone: a finite element analysis of a canine in vivo micromotion experiment. J Biomed Mater Res 36:274-280
29. Ryd L, Albrektsson BE, Carlsson L, Dansgard F, Herberts P, Lindstrand A, Regner L, Toksvig-Larsen S (1995) Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg BR 77:377-383
30. Spears IR, Pfleiderer M, Schneider E, Hille E, Bergmann G, Morlock MM (2000) Interfacial conditions between a press-fit acetabular cup and bone during daily activities: implications for achieving bone in-growth. J Biomech 33:1471-1477
31. Spector M (1982) Bone ingrowth into porous polymers. In: Williams DF (ed) Biocompatibility of orthopedic implants. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton
32. Sumner DR, Turner TM, Urban RM, Galante JO (1992) Remodeling and ingrowth of bone at two years in a canine cementless total hip-arthroplasty model. J Bone Joint Surg AM 74:239-250
33. Szmukler-Moncler S, Salama H, Reingewirtz Y, Dubruille JH (1998) Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature. J Biomed Mater Res 43:192-203
34. Tuan RS (2004) Biology of developmental and regenerative skeletogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res (427 Suppl):S105-117
35. Weinans H, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ (1992) Effects of material properties of femoral hip components on bone remodeling. J Orthop Res 10:845-853
36. Wren TA, Beaupre GS, Carter DR (2000) Mechanobiology of tendon adaptation to compressive loading through fibrocartilaginous metaplasia. J Rehabil R D 37:135-143