U.S. national innovation system for biotechnology: From the Korean perspectives

Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 369-381

  Kim, Kidong ^a   Hyun, Byunghwan ^b   Chung, Sunyang ^a  

^a Sejong University   (South Korea)

^b Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLOW INTERACTIONS; INNOVATION; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; TECHNOLOGY; THEOREM PROVING;

21ST CENTURY; BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIES; CONVERGING TECHNOLOGIES; EFFECTIVE ANALYSIS; GENERIC TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION SYSTEMS; INTERNATIONAL (CO); NATIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS; PORTLAND; PUBLIC RESEARCH; READERS (USER EXPERIENCE); START-UP COMPANIES; SYSTEMATIC (CO);

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

EID: 47849104034     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/PICMET.2007.4349351     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), "Based on OMB data for R&D for FY 2008, agency budget", World Wide Web, http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd/prel08tb.htm#tb2.
2. Bartholomew, S.; "National systems of biotechnology innovation: Complex interdependence in the global system," Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 28, issue. 2, pp. 241-266, 1997.
3. Battelle Technology Partnership Practice and SSTI.; Growing the Nation's Bioscience Sector: State Bioscience Initiatives, 2006.
4. Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO), "Ernst & Young's annual biotechnology industry reports (1995-2004), Compiled by the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO)", World Wide Web, http://www.bio.org.
5. Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO).; The BIO Report, 2004.
6. Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO), World Wide Web, http://www.bio.org.
7. Chaturvedi, S.; "Evolving a national system of biotechnology innovation: some evidence from Singapore, " Science, Technology & Society, vol. 10, no.1, 2005.
8. Chung, S.; "Building a national innovation system through regional innovation systems," Technovation, vol. 22, issue. 8, pp. 485-491, 2002.
9. Chung, S.; "Korean System of Innovations for Biotechnology," International Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 3, nos. 3/4, pp. 299-322, 2002.
10. Cooke, P.; "Biotechnology clusters as regional, sectoral innovation systems," International Regional Science Review, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 8-37, 2002.
11. Ernst. & Young LLP.; Americas Biotechnology Report: Resurgence, 2004.
12. Ernst & Young.; Product Success and Strong Financials Drive Biotech Industry's Maturation According to Ernst & Young's Global Biotechnology Report, 2005.
13. European Commission, Life Science and Biotechnology-A Strategy for Europe, COM (2002) 17 Final, Brussels: European Commission, 2002.
14. Federal Coordinating Council for Science, Engineering and Technology (FCCSET) Committee, Biotechnology for the Twenty-First Century: A Report by the FCCEST Committee on life Science and Health, Washington, D.C, FCCSET Committee, 1992.
15. Freeman, C.; "Formal scientific and technical institutions in the national system of innovation," in National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, B-Å. Lundavall, Ed. London: Pinter Publishers, 1992.
16. Freeman, C.; "Japan a new national system of innovation?," in Technical Change and Economic Theory, G. Dosi, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete, Eds. London/New York: Pinter Publishers, 1988.
17. Freeman, C.; Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, London/New York: Pinter Publishers, 1987.
18. Freeman, C.; "The learning economy and international inequality," in The Globalizing Learning Economy, D. Archibugi and B-Å. Lundvall, Eds. Oxford, 2001.
19. Global Industry Analysts, Inc. (GIA).; Biochips, 2006.
20. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA).; Global Status of Commercialized Transgenic Crops, 2002, 2003. (Worldwide Web, http://www.isaaa.org.)
21. Kline, S.; The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, N. Rosenberg and R. Landau, Eds. Washington: National Academy Press, 1986.
22. Kogut, B.; "Country capabilities and the permeability of borders," Strategic Management Journal, vol. 12, issue. (Summer/Special), pp. 33-47, 1991.
23. Korea Institute of Patent Information (KIPI).; Patent 21, vol. 66, Seoul: In Korean, 2006.
24. Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB).; Biotechnology White Paper, In Korean, 2005.
25. Lundvall, B-Å., B. Johnson, E. S. .Anderson and B. Dalum; "National systems of production, innovation and competence building," Research Policy, vol. 31, issue. 2, pp. 213-231, 2002.
26. Lundvall, B-Å., Ed.; National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London: Pinter Publishers, 1992.
27. Mowery, D. C. and N. Rosenberg; "The U.S. national innovation system," in National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Nelson, R. R., Ed. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
28. National Science Foundation (NSF), World Wide Web, http://www.nsf gov.
29. Nelson, R. R. and N. Rosenberg; "Technical innovation and national systems," in National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Nelson, R. R., Ed. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
30. Nelson, R. R., Ed.; National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
31. Office of Management, and Budget (OMB), World Wide Web, http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb.
32. Ohmae, K.; The Borderless World, New York: Harper Business, 1990.
33. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Innovation in Pharmaceutical Biotechnology: Comparing National Innovation Systems at Sectoral Level, Paris, 2006.
34. Porter, M.; The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: The Free Press, 1990.
35. Senker, J.; "National systems of innovation, organizational learning and industrial biotechnology," Technovation, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 219-229, 1996.
36. Zang, J.; The Dynamics of California's Biotechnology Industry, N. Patel, Eds. San Francisco/California: Public Policy Institute of California, 2005.