National systems of innovation, organizational learning and industrial biotechnology

Technovation

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 219-229

  Senker, Jacqueline ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; INDUSTRY; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC POLICY;

COMMERCIALIZATION; INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS; INDUSTRIAL RESPONSE; INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURE; INNOVATION; ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING;

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0030146777     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0166-4972(95)00069-0     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. ACARD, ABRC and the Royal Society (1980). Biotechnology. Report of a Joint Working Party (the Spinks Report), London, HMSO.
2. Arora, A. and Gambardella, A. (1990). Complementarity and external linkages: the strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. Journal of Industrial Economics, XXXVIII(4), 361-379.
3. Cabinet Office (1990). Annual Review of Government Funded Research and Development. HMSO, London.
4. Chemical and Engineering News (1994), 4 April, 16.
5. Chemistry and Industry (1994), 7 March, 160.
6. Dibner, M. (1991). Biotechnology Guide USA, 2nd ed. Macmillan and Stockton Press, London and New York.
7. Dodgson, M. (1991). The Management of Technological Learning: Lessons from a Biotechnology Company. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
8. Dosi, G. (1983). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy, 11(3), 147-162.
9. Ernst & Young (1994). European Biotech 94. A New Industry Emerges. Ernst & Young European Executive, Brussels.
10. Etzkowitz, H. (1993). Enterprises from science: the origins of science-based regional economic development. Minerva, 31(3), 326-360.
11. Faulkner, W. (1989). Industry-academia linkages in the case of biotechnology in the UK: practice and policy. Workshop of the ECPR Standing Group on Politics and Technology, Como, Italy, 12-14 June. University of Edinburgh.
12. Faulkner, W. and Senker, J. (1995). Policy and management issues in company links with academic and government laboratories: a cross-technology study. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 6(1), 95-112.
13. Faulkner, W. and Senker, J. with Velho, L. (1995). Knowledge Frontiers: Public Sector Research and Industrial Innovation in Biotechnology, Engineering Ceramics and Parallel Computing. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
14. Financial Times (1993), 1 October.
15. Gibbons, M. and Johnston, R. (1974). The roles of science in technological innovation. Research Policy, 3, 220-242.
16. Goodeve, Sir Charles (1967). A 'Route 128' for Britain? New Scientist, 9 February, 346-348.
17. Granstrand, O., Bohlin, E., Oskarsson, C. and Sjöberg, N. (1992). External technology acquisition in large multi-technology corporations. R&D Management, 22(2), 111-133.
18. Hall, S. (1988). Invisible Frontiers. The Race to Synthesize a Human Gene. Sidgwick & Jackson, London.
19. Hedberg, B. (1981). How organizations learn and unlearn. In Nystrom, P. and Starbuck, W. (eds.). Handbook of Organisational Design, 1. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
20. Kenney, M. (1986). Biotechnology: The University-Industrial Complex. Yale University Press.
21. Lundvall, B.-A. (1992). National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter Publishers, London.
22. McGraw-Hill's Biotechnology Newswatch (1983). Biobusiness World Data Base. Draft Report by a US Government Interagency Working Group on Competitive and Transfer Aspects of Biotechnology. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
23. McMullan, E. (1986). The economics of entrepreneurship education. In: Brown, W. and Rothwell, R. (eds.). Entrepreneurship and Technology: World Experiences and Policies. Longman, Harlow, pp. 101-112.
24. Malerba, F. (1992). Learning by firms and incremental technical change. Economic Journal, 102(413), 845-859.
25. Metcalfe, J.S. and Gibbons, M. (1989). Technology, variety and organization: a systematic perspective on the competitive process. In: Rosenbloom, R. and Burgelman, R. (eds.). Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, 4. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT and London, UK, 153-193.
26. Monck, C., Quintas, P., Port, R., Storey, D. and Wynarczyk, P. (1988). Science Parks and the Growth of High Technology Firms. Croom Helm, London.
27. Mowery, D. (1983). The relationship between intrafirm and contractual forms of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1900-1940. Explorations in Economic History, 20(4), 351-374.
28. Oakey, R., Faulkner, W., Cooper, S. and Walsh, V. (1990). New Firms in the Biotechnology Industry: Their Contribution to Innovation and Growth. Pinter, London.
29. OECD (1975). Changing Priorities for Government R&D. OECD, Paris.
30. Orsenigo, L. (1989). The Emergence of Biotechnology. Pinter, London.
31. Pavitt, K. (1987). The objectives of technology policy. Science and Public Policy, 14(4), 182-188.
32. Piatier, A. (1984). Barriers to Innovation. Frances Pinter, London. Quoted in: Malecki, E. (1991). Technology and Economic Development. Longman, Harlow, p. 341.
33. Piatier, A. (1984). Barriers to Innovation. Frances Pinter, London. Quoted in: Malecki, E. (1991). Technology and Economic Development. Longman, Harlow, p. 341.
34. Ratner, M. (1989). Dealing with large companies. Biotechnology, 7(10), 1013.
35. Rogers, E. (1986). High-technology companies that are university spin-offs. In: Brown, W. and Rothwell, R. (eds.). Entrepreneurship and Technology: World Experiences and Policies. Longman, Harlow, pp. 134-143.
36. Rothwell, R. (1977). The characteristics of successful innovators and technically progressive firms. R&D Management, 7(3), 191-206.
37. Rothwell, R. and Zegveld, W. (1982). Innovation and the Small and Medium Sized Firm. Frances Pinter, London.
38. Sapienza, A. (1989). R&D collaboration as a global competitive tactic - biotechnology and the ethical pharmaceutical industry. R&D Management, 19(4), 285-295.
39. Segal, N. (1986). Universities and technological entrepreneurship in Britain: some implications of the Cambridge phenomenon. In: Brown, W. and Rothwell, R. (eds.). Entrepreneurship and Technology: World Experiences and Policies. Longman, Harlow, 113-126.
40. Senker, J. (1991). Evaluating the funding of strategic science - some lessons from British experience. Research Policy, 20(1), 29-43.
41. Senker, J. (1993). Barriers to technology transfer in small British biotechnology firms. International Journal of Technology Management, Special Publication on Small Firms and Innovation: The External Influences, pp. 152-160.
42. Senker, J. and Sharp, M. (1988). The Biotechnology Directorate of the SERC, Report and Evaluation of its Achievements - 1981-87. Report to the Management Committee of the Biotechnology Directorate. SPRU, University of Sussex, Brighton.
43. Sharp, M. (1985). Biotechnology: watching and waiting. In: Sharp, M. (ed.). Europe and the New Technologies. Pinter, London.
44. Sharp, M. (1989). Biotechnology in the UK. OTA Conference, Biotechnology in a Global Environment, Washington, DC, 6-7 July 1989. SPRU, University of Sussex, Brighton.
45. Sharp, M., Thomas, S. and Martin, P. (1993). Technology Transfers and Innovation Policy: Chemicals and Biotechnology. STEEP Discussion Paper No. 6. SPRU, University of Sussex, Brighton.
46. Smith, J.G. and Fleck, V. (1988). Strategies of new biotechnology firms. Long Range Planning, 21(3), 51-57.
47. Teitelman, R. (1989). Gene Dreams. Basic Books, New York.
48. Tiler, C. and Gibbons, M. (1991). A case study of organizational learning: the UK teaching company scheme. Industry & Higher Education, March, 47-54.
49. US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (1988). New Developments in Biotechnology: US Investments in Biotechnology-Special Report. OTA-BA-360, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
50. US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (1991). Biotechnology in a Global Economy. Congress of the United States, Washington, Table 4.6.
51. Walsh, V. (1993). Demand, public markets and innovation in biotechnology. Science and Public Policy, 20(3), 138-156.
52. Webster, A. (1994). University-corporate ties and the construction of research agendas. Sociology, 28(1), 123-142.
53. Wiener, M.J. (1980). English Culture and the Decline of the Industrial Spirit, 1850-1980. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.