Effects of aging on brainstem responses to toneburst auditory stimuli: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study in dogs

Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 937-945

  Ter Haar, G ^a   Venker van Haagen, A J ^a   Van Den Brom, W E ^a   Van Sluijs, F J ^a   Smoorenburg, G F ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Age related hearing loss; Audiogram; Frequency specific evoked responses; Presbycusis

Indexed keywords

AGING; ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN STEM; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DOG; FEMALE; HEARING; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AGING; ANIMALS; BRAIN STEM; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DOGS; FEMALE; HEARING; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE;

ANIMALIA; CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 47849094559     PISSN: 08916640     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2008.0126.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Gates GA, Mills JH. Presbycusis. Lancet 2005;366:1111-1120.
2. Lee FS, Matthews LJ, Dubno JR, et al. Longitudinal study of pure-tone thresholds in older persons. Ear Hear 2005;26:1-11.
3. Sajjadi H, Paparella MM, Canalis RF. Presbycusis. In: Canalis RF, Lambert PR, eds. The Ear: Comprehensive Otology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000: 545-557.
4. Willott JF, Chisolm TH, Lister JJ. Modulation of presbycusis: Current status and future directions. Audiol Neurotol 2001;6:231-249.
5. Nelson EG, Hinojosa R. Presbycusis: A human temporal bone study of individuals with downward sloping audiometric patterns of hearing loss and review of the literature. Laryngoscope 2006;116(Supp 112):1-12.
6. Jennings CR, Jones NS. Presbycusis. J Laryngol Otol 2001; 115:171-178.
7. Ohlemiller KK. Contributions of mouse models to understanding of age- and noise-related hearing loss. Brain Res 2006; 1091:89-102.
8. Toppila E, Pyykkö I, Starck J. Age and noise-induced hearing loss. Scand Audiol 2001;30:236-244.
9. Gates GA, Couropmitree NN, Myers RH. Genetic associations in age-related hearing thresholds. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:654-659.
10. Seidman MD, Ahmad N, Bai U. Molecular mechanisms of age-related hearing loss. Ageing Res Rev 2002;1:331-343.
11. Balaban RS, Nemoto S, Finkel T. Mitochondria, oxidants, and aging. Cell 2005;120:483-495.
12. Krause KH. Aging: A revisited theory based on free radicals generated by NOX family NADPH oxidases. Exp Gerontol 2007;42:256-262.
13. Enrietto JA, Jacobson KM, Baloh RW. Aging effects on auditory and vestibular responses: A longitudinal study. Am J Otolaryngol 1999;20:371-378.
14. Moscicki E, Elkins E, Baum H, et al. Hearing loss in the elderly: An epidemiologic study of the Framingham heart study cohort. Ear Hear 1985;6:184-190.
15. Robinson DW, Sutton GJ. Age effect in hearing - A comparative analysis of published threshold data. Audiology 1979;18:320-334.
16. Pedersen KE, Rosenhall U, Möller MB. Changes in puretone thresholds in individuals aged 70-81: Results from a longitudinal study. Audiology 1989;28:194-204.
17. Brant LJ, Fozard JL. Age changes in pure-tone hearing thresholds in a longitudinal study of normal human aging. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;88:813-820.
18. Gates GA, Schmid P, Kujawa SA, et al. Longitudinal threshold changes in older males with audiometric notches. Hear Res 2000;141:220-228.
19. Knowles KE, Cash WC, Blauch BS. Auditory-evoked responses of dogs with different hearing abilities. Can J Vet Res 1988;52:394-397.
20. Knowles K, Blauch B, Leipold H, et al. Reduction of spiral ganglion neurons in the aging canine with hearing loss. J Vet Med 1989;36:188-199.
21. Shimada A, Ebisu M, Morita T, et al. Age-related changes in the cochlea and cochlear nuclei of dogs. J Vet Med Sci 1998;60:41-48.
22. Poncelet LC, Coppens AG, Deltenre PF. Audiograms estimated from brainstem tone-evoked potentials in dogs from 10 days to 1.5 months of age. J Vet Intern Med 2002;16:674-679.
23. Poncelet L, Deltenre P, Coppens A, et al. Brains stem auditory potentials evoked by clicks in the presence of high-pass filtered noise in dogs. Res Vet Sci 2006;80:167-174.
24. Markessis E, Poncelet L, Colin C, et al. Auditory steady-state evoked potentials (ASSEPs): A study of optimal stimulation parameters for frequency-specific threshold measurement in dogs. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:1760-1771.
25. Ter Haar G, Venker-van Haagen AJ, de Groot HNM, et al. Click and low-, middle, and high-frequency toneburst stimulation of the canine cochlea. J Vet Intern Med 2002;16:274-280.
26. Goldston RT. Introduction and overview of geriatrics. In: Goldston RT, Hoskins JD, eds. Geriatrics & Gerontology of the Dog and Cat. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company; 1995:1-9.
27. Boettcher FA. Presbyacusis and the auditory brainstem response. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002;45:1249-1261.
28. Pawitan Y. In all likelihood: Statistical Modelling and Inference Using Likelihood (Oxford Science Publications). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
29. Sims MH. Electrodiagnostic evaluation of auditory function. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1988;18:913-944.
30. Sims MH, Moore RE. Auditory-evoked response in the clinically normal dog: Early latency components. Am J Vet Res 1984; 45:2019-2027.
31. Venker-van Haagen AJ, Siemelink RJG, Smoorenburg GF. Auditory brainstem responses in the normal beagle. Vet Quart 1989;11:129-137.
32. Kawasaki Y, Inada S. Peaks of brainstem auditory evoked potentials in dogs. Vet Res Commun 1994;18:383-396.
33. Marshall AE. Brain stem auditory-evoked response of the nonanesthetized dog. Am J Vet Res 1985;46:966-973.
34. Ohlemiller KK. Age-related hearing loss: The status of Schuknecht's typology. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;12:439-443.
35. Harman D. The aging process. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1981;78:7124-7128.
36. Heffner HE. Hearing in large and small dogs: Absolute thresholds and size of the tympanic membrane. Behav Neurosci 1983;97:310-318.
37. Purdy SC, Houghton JM, Keith WS, et al. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses: Effective masking levels and relationship to behavioural thresholds in normal-hearing adults. Audiology 1989;28:82-91.
38. Stapells DR, Picton TW, Durieux-Smith A, et al. Thresholds for short-latency auditory-evoked potentials to tones in notched noise in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults. Audiology 1990;29:262-274.
39. Stapells DR, Picton PW, Perez-Abalo M, et al. Frequency specificity in evoked potential audiometry. In: Jacobsen JT, ed. The Auditory Brainstem Response. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Pres; 1985:147-177.
40. Yamada O, Yagi T, Yamane H, et al. Clinical evaluation of the auditory evoked brain stem response. Auris-Nasus-Larynx 1975;2:97-105.
41. Kodera K, Marsh RR, Suzuki M, Suzuki JI. Portions of tone pips contributing to frequency-selective auditory brainstem responses. Audiology 1983;22:209-218.
42. Davis H, Hirsh SK, Turpin LL, Peacock ME. Threshold sensitivity and frequency specificity in auditory brainstem response audiometry. Audiology 1985;24:54-70.
43. Zanten GA, Brocaar MP. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses to clicks masked by notched noise. Audiology 1984;23:253-264.
44. Fausti SA, Rappaport BZ, Frey RH, Henry JA, et al. Reliability of evoked responses to high-frequency (8-14 kHz) tone bursts. J Am Acad Audiol 1991;2:105-114.
45. Gorga MP, Worthington DW. Some issues relevant to the measurement of frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses. Sem Hear 1983;4:353-362.
46. Uzuka Y, Fukaki M, Hara Y, Matsumoto H. Brainstem auditory evoked responses elicited by tone-burst stimuli in clinically normal dogs. J Vet Intern Med 1998;12:22-25.
47. Silman S, Silverman CA. Brainstem auditory-evoked potentials. In: Silman S, Silverman CA, eds. Auditory Diagnosis, Principles and Applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc; 1991:249-297.
48. Pearson JD, Morrell CH, Gordon-Salant S, et al. Gender differences in a longitudinal study of age-associated hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1995;97:1196-1205.
49. Smoorenburg GF. Risk of noise-induced hearing loss following exposure to Chinese firecrackers. Audiology 1993;32:333-343.